Originally posted by abhilegend
Why so touchy moron? Did your boyfriend steal your hammer too?And Juggernaut vs Unworthy Thor? Why not.
Bring it on bitch.
😂
Okay, so Thor (Without Mjolnir but with his axe) vs. Current Juggernaut? No problem.
And you're not going to try and weasel your way of this are you? Try and say Thor can't use any past feats or whatever nonsense?
Originally posted by Prof. T.C McAbe
The only prayer of a chance Thor has is his Axe, wonder if it will work against Juggs. Else he gets stomped here, by classic Juggs that is.
The only way classic Juggernaut would win is if he had his force field. And even then, Unworthy Thor could bfr him. Thor has used lightning for teleportation.
And the axe would definitely work on him. Much less has.
Originally posted by Rage.Of.Olympus
😂Okay, so Thor (Without Mjolnir but with his axe) vs. Current Juggernaut? No problem.
And you're not going to try and weasel your way of this are you? Try and say Thor can't use any past feats or whatever nonsense?
Your claim was that unworthy Thor has better feats than Juggernaut in general. Are you backing down from that?
Originally posted by quanchi112
Set a time you can begin. You already have judges I believe.
Open to judging? I can't wait to use these awesome arguments:
Originally posted by abhilegend
Juggernaut.LMAO, has any character looked as bad as he does for so much power?
Also Iceman tossing him koed him as explained this issue.
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-wyUTONTsN0E/WgMoqYUPkYI/AAAAAAAAC-A/ixPWD6gb2EwtuaNEt7c_er6nQaMTf8JDwCHMYCw/s1600/RCO003_w.jpg
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-a0Y8-HXDXLY/WgMoq1MCJwI/AAAAAAAAC-I/ry3wLdOGxG83mx_wxB4-A5bTF3nMdsyNwCHMYCw/s1600/RCO004.jpg
Originally posted by abhilegend
He is sealed inside in his own armor isn't bad?That's silver age hokeyness.
Originally posted by abhilegend
Never change Juggernaut. Still the biggest loser in the comics.
I have the best arguments ever. The best arguments in the world.
- India Trump
Originally posted by abhilegend
Are we using unworthy Thor or Thor in general with an axe?Your claim was that unworthy Thor has better feats than Juggernaut in general. Are you backing down from that?
Lol, somehow I predicted this. Thor vs. Juggernaut, why is that complicated? You're so gun-ho! Let's do it!
What exactly is your stance? First differentiate between whether you were referring to Unworthy Thor or Thor without Mjolnir (Even though it's the same character, separated only by mindset). Next, whether you were battle zoning Juggernaut having superior feats OR that he'd beat Thor in a fight. There is a distinction between that. I didn't think I had to make that clear.
Let me make my position clear so that you have clarity when we do this: Yes Thor from JUST the unworthy period has superior feats to anything Juggernaut has done recently. Yes, Unworthy Thor would beat Juggernaut in a fight, in part because he is not magically limited to feats from the last handful of years. I wouldn't do that for either character.
Because from what I gather, you're limiting Thor to just the Unworthy period in feats, aka from the moment he dropped his hammer, while using Juggernaut since his inception? 🙂
I will never judge any debates but the judges have already come forward and he was joking. If Abhi is going to try to weasel out of this by arguing over his stance I'll definitely say I called it.
Originally posted by PhilosophíaThere's a reason so many posters call Abhi out to battlezone him. They are supremely confident they'll win.
The day has come when rage is so scared of abhi, he wants to use quanchi as a judge.
Originally posted by Rage.Of.Olympus
Lol, somehow I predicted this. Thor vs. Juggernaut, why is that complicated? You're so gun-ho! Let's do it!
I have no issues of Juggernaut vs Thor minus mjolnir. You tried arguing that Unworthy Thor has better feats than Juggernaut and then bitched out with every Thor showing without mjolnir.
What exactly is your stance? First differentiate between whether you were referring to Unworthy Thor or Thor without Mjolnir (Even though it's the same character, separated only by mindset). Next, whether you were battle zoning Juggernaut having superior feats OR that he'd beat Thor in a fight. There is a distinction between that. I didn't think I had to make that clear.
I just put a laughing smilie and you started foaming at the mouth.
It's about Unworthy Thor having better feats in general. I have no issues with either Thor without mjolnir or Thor with an axe. It's your claim and if you want to back away, who am I to stop you?
Toughen up snowflake, you're in big leagues now.
Let me make my position clear so that you have clarity when we do this: Yes Thor from JUST the unworthy period has superior feats to anything Juggernaut has done recently. Yes, Unworthy Thor would beat Juggernaut in a fight, in part because he is not magically limited to feats from the last handful of years. I wouldn't do that for either character.
So you want your cake and eat it too?
Unworthy Thor is Thor after Original Sin. Anything before is invalid for this form of character as he wasn't unworthy before.
Juggernaut isn't limited by this. I can do Thor vs Juggernaut for the whole history but then you have to forfeit the claim that Unworthy Thor has better feats than Juggernaut.
Originally posted by Rage.Of.Olympus
[B]Unworthy Thor has better feats than anything Juggernaut has done.
This was your claim. Not that we are limiting Juggernaut's feats to last few years.
What's it going to be buttercup?
Because from what I gather, you're limiting Thor to just the Unworthy period in feats, aka from the moment he dropped his hammer, while using Juggernaut since his inception? 🙂
That's what you claimed. Why wouldn't I do so then?
Better watch what you say sweetheart.
Originally posted by Rage.Of.Olympus
Open to judging? I can't wait to use these awesome arguments:I have the best arguments ever. The best arguments in the world.
- India Trump
Originally posted by Rage.Of.Olympus
Except his loss to Ulik where he was depressed he's been a beast.
Lost to Ulik, huh?
