Because it wasn't contradicted anywhere in the comic. Cap having an advantage was where he couldn't KO a weakened and drained Superman with a cheapshot but Superman knocked him out.
But Superman admitting that he couldnt beat Cap in a fist fight and actually doing something to prevent him from facing Cap face to face (switching partners with Batman) is contradicting? No. If youre going to accept one statement, accept ALL, especially if the statements take place in the same comic. We don't pick and choose ABHI.
He didn't admit he couldn't beat Cap, he admitted Cap had an advantage. Big shit, he has said that to ****ing Kryptonite Man. Also he didn't switch partners because he couldn't deal with him, it was all a game to need time as he said here.
I'm accepting both statements, Cap was stated to have "an" advantage. He wasn't strong enough to knock superman out even with Superman being weakened and drained after cheapshotting him while going ALL OUT, Superman however KTFO him with a cheapshot. Superman while weakened>>Captain Marvel.
Superman was also handicapped, by being unable to solar charge.
And Eclipsed characters have been defeated, including Wonder Woman, so it's doubtful the "amp" is worth more then the power drain.
__________________ What CDTM believes;
Never let anyone else define you. Don't be a jerk just to be a jerk, but if you are expressing your true inner feelings and beliefs, or at least trying to express that inner child, and everyone gets pissed off about it, never NEVER apologize for it. Let them think what they want, let them define you in their narrow little minds while they suppress every last piece of them just to keep a friend that never liked them for themselves in the first place.
I get what you're trying to say, but that's some horrible logic right there.
Plus, being wrong in parts doesn't help either.
Shut up. You're worse than most of the people on this forum, and you're barely allowed on this forum as it is. Stirring up trouble is only going to see you get banned sooner rather than later.
I did questioned the feat before any of you did, the difference is that I'm mature enough to allow his reply which seems within reason. It's called debating without an agenda, learn to do it my friend.
That was quite a mediocre showing for Billy, considering the stuff he has done
I try to actively debate with him. I see it differently. I have also seen Marvel ko him easily with Cheapshots and with Superman at full power.
I am basing my reasoning on this one fight, nope. The two have a rich history of being close to equal in terms of strength and power. I feel basing their entire history on the one interaction of an Eclipso possession square off is spinning things. Do you disagree with my wisdom in that assessment ?
__________________
Last edited by quanchi112 on Mar 12th, 2014 at 01:54 PM
KMC Community Forums
@ just hanging on a single statement.
Mar 11th, 2014 03:25 PM
