Prove it Sexy! Bane was as good as able to defeat Kas'im. Kas'im = Saber God. Exar Kun beat Vodo, while Vodo was holding back. Vodo = staff wielding jackass. Hmm...
Registered: Jun 2005
Location: Lifting weights and lifting ass.
Account Restricted
since when vodo was holding back, and i thought bane killed kasim when he pummeled the temple, i havnt read the book yet, i was counting on what sexy and zephiel said
Vodo states in Jedi Academy that he was holding back, read the books before coming out with pointless questions, Kadesh.
And we're talking sabers here, Bane as good as defeated him in round one (with a few advantages on his side), got destroyed in round 2 (when completely disadvantaged).
Bane NEVER defeated Kas'im Captain Planet. Stop embarassing yourself by making shit up. Exar Kun was a saber prodigy, beat Vodo as a padawan, and developed his own saber and style. Bane was NOT a saber prodigy or anything of the sort. You lose once again.
Stop twisting my words, I said 'as good as' defeated him.
Proof? Not denying it, but the fact that you seem to find it impossible to believe that Bane was, I want to see your proof for Kun being one.
The reason behind your choice of the word padawan is to emphasize how young and how little training Kun had, correct? Well Bane had less than three years of training when he virtually defeated Kas'im, logic points to Kun having trained for far longer.
And? This hardly speaks for his actual dueling ability, and considering he spent less than a year creating the saber and style, it most likely sucked bad.
The whole prodigy concept must have completely flown right over your head for you not to consider Bane one. It's funny how you consider Kun a prodigy, when he displayed less skill with far more training time, yet you don't consider Bane one. Nice logic...
No, he wasn't, your opinion is irrelevant if it's contradictory to facts.
It was stated that Kun was a lightsaber prodigy. He had no equal during his life. Bane was NOT a lightsaber prodigy nor was the best with it, it was his force abilities he was known for.
You are too easy. A padawan is someone who is not yet a Jedi Knight or whatever. So when I say padawan I mean Padawan. Bane never nearly defeated Kas'im, and your logic fails when you realize that Bane knew all of Kas'im's moves, and still couldn't defeat him.
Your stupidity has gone over your head completely, so I won't bother remedying it. One more thing..
You seem to be confused here, the correct wording would be 'No, he didn't'.
This is the end of part 1 of the duel:
'The Blademaster became desperate. Leaping, spinning, ducking, rolling: he was wild and reckless in his retreat, seeking now only to escape with his life. But he didn't know the temple like Bane did. bane kept the routes to the outside cut off, slowly herding his opponent into a dead-end hallway.
Recognising what was happening, Kas'im blew open the heavy door of a side room with the force and dived inside. Bane knew there was no other exit, and he paused at the threshold of the room to savor his victory.
The Twi'lek stood in the center of the empty chamber, panting heavily, stooped ever so slightly, his head bowed. He looked up when Bane stepped through the doorway. But when his gaze met Bane's, there was no hint of defeat in his eyes.
"You should have finished me when you had the chance," he said.'
You were saying?
Where? This is a lie, spawned from IKC no doubt. Prove me wrong, if you can.
There was no Kas'im during his time. And prove that he was the best? Ulic was arguably better.
O RLY?
He was exceptional with both. It's also hinted that he was #2 of the BoD.
You're an idiot. Your choice of the word padawan was to emphasize how young and/or how little training he had when he 'beat' Vodo (I seem to recall him getting pwned first time round, and getting lucky the second time), I was just saying that Bane clearly had even less training than Kun did when he did as good as he did against Kas'im (and possibly younger, though there's no proof for this), so these feats point to Bane being more prodigious than Kun was.
Yes, he did.
1. His ability to understand the saber, and memorise the moves and sequences so quickly only speaks for his dueling ability, stop acting like it's some unfair advantage.
2. You're twisting the events. It was only in the first part of the duel, when Kas'im used his saberstaff that Bane had this luxury, and he did virtually defeat him, he definitely showed signs of superiority in that scenario at least.
3. Bane only actually lost when faced with a weapon he had hardly ever been up against, this was an unfair advantage, a huge one if we go by Kas'im's lectures earlier in the book.
Just one more thing to add to your embarassment. It's funny how I constantly tell you how you're copying EOD, and your rebuttal includes telling me the exact same thing. Wonderful, you have resorted to the moronic "I know you are but what am I" defense. Bravo child.
It's funny, there do seem to be a few haters out there; they're either dumb, envious, or have based their judgements off of what the dumb/envious people have said, methinks this is partly due to Escape's status on this forum, and not many people knowing how much of a snake he is.
Nobody is envious of you. The general consensus is that you're a prepubescent, unintelligent, obnoxious child who lacks any kind of debating skill. But I hear denial works for social outcasts.
Dec 11th, 2006 11:13 AM
