Classic NES
Balloooooooooooooon
Gender: Male Location: The sewers of the Big City!
quote: (post ) Originally posted by masterbruce
however, once you're not omnipotent, you can no longer become omnipotent.
Whwere are these extra conditions coming from?
__________________
Sep 9th, 2007 02:42 AM
Starscream M
Senior Member
Gender: Unspecified Location: Cybertron
quote: (post ) Originally posted by Sandai Kitetsu
Whwere are these extra conditions coming from?
it's not an extra condition, it's logic
an inomnipotent (limited) being can not make himself omnipotent (limitless)
however, an omnipotent being can make himself inomnipotent
its common sense really
__________________
Defacto Leader of the KMC VS Resistance Movement
Sep 9th, 2007 02:44 AM
Classic NES
Balloooooooooooooon
Gender: Male Location: The sewers of the Big City!
quote: (post ) Originally posted by masterbruce
it's not an extra condition, it's logic
Omnipotentence is a supra logical concept, my friend.
__________________
Sep 9th, 2007 02:45 AM
Starscream M
Senior Member
Gender: Unspecified Location: Cybertron
quote: (post ) Originally posted by Sandai Kitetsu
Omnipotentence is a supra logical concept, my friend.
accepting that, I still don't see any flaws with my reasoning of how god can create an unliftable rock just by losing his omnipotence
__________________
Defacto Leader of the KMC VS Resistance Movement
Sep 9th, 2007 02:46 AM
Smurph
tu quoqumber
Gender: Male Location:
quote: (post ) Originally posted by masterbruce
omnipotent = can do anything
therefore, an omnipotent being can become not omnipotent.
however, once you're not omnipotent, you can no longer become omnipotent.
Are you seriously making the implication that someone who can do anything would have to make a sacrifice to overcome a simple paradox?
Supra logical... it's ineffable.
Sep 9th, 2007 02:50 AM
Starscream M
Senior Member
Gender: Unspecified Location: Cybertron
quote: (post ) Originally posted by SnazzySmurph
Are you seriously making the implication that someone who can do anything would have to make a sacrifice to overcome a simple paradox?
so what if he has to make a sacrifice...he still succeeds at creating a rock that he can't lift right? that's all the question poses...never said anything about not making any sacrifices, which is the trick part because no one thinks that way.
__________________
Defacto Leader of the KMC VS Resistance Movement
Sep 9th, 2007 02:54 AM
Smurph
tu quoqumber
Gender: Male Location:
quote: (post ) Originally posted by masterbruce
so what if he has to make a sacrifice...he still succeeds at creating a rock that he can't lift right? that's all the question poses...never said anything about not making any sacrifices, which is the trick part because no one thinks that way.
If you can do ANYTHING, you don't have to make a sacrifice, or trade anything, in order to defeat a simple little paradox.
It's INEFFABLE.
Sep 9th, 2007 03:00 AM
Classic NES
Balloooooooooooooon
Gender: Male Location: The sewers of the Big City!
Is this really that hard to get?
__________________
Sep 9th, 2007 03:03 AM
Starscream M
Senior Member
Gender: Unspecified Location: Cybertron
quote: (post ) Originally posted by masterbruce
1. God is omnipotent.
2. By asking him to create a rock he can't lift, basically all he has to do is give up his omnipotence.
3. He creates a rock and then removes his omnipotence.
4. Now, he can no longer lift the rock and is no longer omnipotent.
Therefore, God, an omnipotent being, has succeeded at creating a rock he can't lift
this is called thinking outside the box for a solution
__________________
Defacto Leader of the KMC VS Resistance Movement
Sep 9th, 2007 03:06 AM
Soljer
Beware my Power
Gender: Unspecified Location:
quote: (post ) Originally posted by masterbruce
this is called thinking outside the box for a solution
No, it's called an invalid argument, and repetition of a falsehood does not change it's truth value.
You keep trying to pass it off as a 'solution' when it is not one.
You've solved nothing. You're incorrect. Try to wrap your head around it.
__________________
[IMG][/IMG]
Sep 9th, 2007 03:41 AM
Starscream M
Senior Member
Gender: Unspecified Location: Cybertron
quote: (post ) Originally posted by Soljer
No, it's called an invalid argument, and repetition of a falsehood does not change it's truth value.
You keep trying to pass it off as a 'solution' when it is not one.
You've solved nothing. You're incorrect. Try to wrap your head around it.
you calling it incorrect doesn't make it incorrect. you have to say WHY it is incorrect.
as far as I know, my solution does not violate any conditions set by the paradoxical question
__________________
Defacto Leader of the KMC VS Resistance Movement
Sep 9th, 2007 03:45 AM
Soljer
Beware my Power
Gender: Unspecified Location:
quote: (post ) Originally posted by masterbruce
you calling it incorrect doesn't make it incorrect. you have to say WHY it is incorrect.
as far as I know, my solution does not violate any conditions set by the paradoxical question
Sure it does.
You're implying that an omnipotent being could ONLY accomplish something by stripping away his omnipotence.
Hence, he wasn't an omnipotent being to begin with.
__________________
[IMG][/IMG]
Sep 9th, 2007 03:51 AM
Starscream M
Senior Member
Gender: Unspecified Location: Cybertron
quote: (post ) Originally posted by Soljer
Sure it does.
You're implying that an omnipotent being could ONLY accomplish something by stripping away his omnipotence.
Hence, he wasn't an omnipotent being to begin with.
no, I never said it was the ONLY way to accomplish it.
is there another way to do it without defying logic, perhaps, but I don't know it.
or maybe as you and others have suggested, there is no other LOGICAL way, hence ineffable.
however, I am saying the solution I offered is ONE feasible solution within the bounds of logic for God to accomplish the task, at least that's my opinion.
__________________
Defacto Leader of the KMC VS Resistance Movement
Sep 9th, 2007 03:56 AM
Supermanluv
Restricted
Gender: Location: United Kingdom
Account Restricted
I bet evryone on here agrees its a paradox though ?
Sep 9th, 2007 03:59 AM
nvrbeenwthagirl
Restricted
Gender: Male Location: Anti-Forum Elitist. I put Elitist i
Account Restricted
quote: (post ) Originally posted by masterbruce
basically, with this rock thingy, you're asking if a being with no limits can set a limit for himself
then the answer would be no, so I change my original answer
Then the being wouldn't be unlimited. A being with no limits could limit themself. But an Omnicient being would do such a thing. this was why the beyonder was an idiot.
__________________
Sep 9th, 2007 04:00 AM
batdude123
Fellow Tu Quoqumber
Gender: Male Location: Drifting aimlessly.
quote: (post ) Originally posted by Supermanluv
I bet evryone on here agrees its a paradox though ?
This is the definition of a paradox.
__________________
Poppa's comin home to sling some dick.
Sep 9th, 2007 04:01 AM
Merlyn
Order Of...
Gender: Unspecified Location:
Argh..
These type of threads are ridiculous.
Am I the only one who realizes that an omnipotent being can do anything ?
Such a being has the power to literally write/change ANY conceptual "laws" he wishes...
Such a being is beyond logic and explination.
Making a thread like this is to belittle said being's power down to "human standards", thus no longer making the being in question, omnipotent.
Sep 9th, 2007 06:10 AM
Smurph
tu quoqumber
Gender: Male Location:
quote: (post ) Originally posted by SnazzySmurph
Anyways one last time for this thread, say it with me everybody...
IT'S F*CKING INEFFABLE , DIPSHITS!
Sep 9th, 2007 06:25 AM
Air Legend
Moderat0r
Gender: Male Location: United States
quote: (post ) Originally posted by SnazzySmurph
It's ineffable to me dipshits
Fixed
Sep 9th, 2007 06:53 AM
Smurph
tu quoqumber
Gender: Male Location:
quote: (post ) Originally posted by Air Legend
Fixed Your solution is the same as Masterbruce's, and therefore failure.
You don't get it at all. The problem or the paradox...
Sep 9th, 2007 06:54 AM
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is OFF
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
Text-only version