For one:
Because in coping it your saying he can copy gods power. Where as in Siphoning it your just taking it from a person weaker then God that is was given to.
The writer's intentions were very clear, he copied the power of the Lt. Sure,he doesnt have the feats and was quickly stopped right afterwards by Scathan. You can disagree with me if you want but my interpretation is obviously different than yours. Again he doesnt copy character's forms but their powers.
Did you read the quote where I said to prove this? I meant prove everything he claimed. Not my fault you missed that.
__________________
Last edited by quanchi112 on Aug 27th, 2008 at 09:25 PM
Yes,due to Nabu letting him kill him. Spectre's actions when this reprehensible were stopped but this actually proves my point. BA could steal the Spectre's power and this had nothing to do with god allowing it. god only stepped in when he needed to. Nabu knew this.
Imo, Spectre would have lost to Captain Marvel if Enchantress hadnt gone evil.
no, he copies *powers/abilities that he observes* which is EXACTLY wat he did.....and ALL that he did.
so, unless ya wanna put forward that Scathan was MORE POWERFUL than the LT then this is the only way to interpret wat happend.
I supported the statement made in the post that U replied to with "Prove it."; its not my fault U want me to prove something else for an argument that Im NOT supporting nor can realize it yet.
perhaps U should read wat a person is saying instead of wat U want them to say??
god shoved him in because he was being a very bad spectre. do you think god wanted him to destroy magic? I mean the Spectre didnt even understand that he wasnt even destroying it. Spectre needs a host because on his own he can get talked into things,ex:Eclipso.
your exact statement was, "god didn't stop Spectre's power in dov." i merely responded with scans proving the inaccuracy of said statement. nothing more.
__________________
Last edited by Galan007 on Aug 27th, 2008 at 09:34 PM
Yes but that as well as past events show the level of control God has over the Spectre and his power. He wouldn't allow him to use the power against Libra.
God stop him when he wants, it's not easy to understand due to that whole "working in mysterious ways" thing.
By Siphoning gods power it would indicate that its powers can be manipulated in one form or another, so I don’t see why copying would be any different than siphoning.
If a weaker person has gods power and that power can be taken from him would make it that the person does not have gods power but merely a fraction of it , just by the fact it was siphoned.
I don’t see why you can’t copy fraction of god’s power
In a since everything is God’s power unless shown somewhere in comics it’s not illogical for it to be steeling
But will copying spectre make pro = God I think not
Siphoning is not the same as copying. What is hard to get about that?
Siphoning God's power from someone less powerful then God is different then trying to copy that power itself. Besides has it ever been shown that Protege can copy power someone has that is given to them from another source?
Yes but your still not Siphoning the power from God, your Siphoning it from the Spectre.
In copying it you would be copying the power of God's wrath. Nothing on panel shows Protege can do that nor none that I know of that shows he can copy a power that is not naturally that persons power.
Well you copy Spectre's power than again your assuming that Spectre power = God full power if not I don't see a problem he will copy a fraction of the power spectre has , just cause it's God's power does not mean it can't be copied unless you can prove otherwise. I understand perfect what you are saying and I disagree unless I see some evidence.
Not claiming he will copy Spectre
up to god but i don't think you can copy god's full power.
KMC Community Forums
Aug 27th, 2008 09:06 PM
again your assuming that Spectre power = God full power if not I don't see a problem he will copy a fraction of the power spectre has , just cause it's God's power does not mean it can't be copied unless you can prove otherwise. I understand perfect what you are saying and I disagree unless I see some evidence. 
