The belt of strength didn't amp the blast but reinforced Mjolnir by the way. The same writer who wrote this issue (DeFalco.) had Mjolnir absorb energies like that of a Null Bomb without a problem just so you know.
I'm not exaggerating anything.
And I don't see how this changes shit for Galactus. This was still the era that Celestials were at the top of the food chain as I recall. Above beings such as Galactus and Exitar was one of the most powerful Celestial introduced at the time.
are you f^ckin serious? you want to tell me superman freakin 1 million who got higher feats then god himself will die from the godblast? allow me to Lol all night long at you
Superman 1 million has higher feats than God himself? I suggest you actually read the arc. Kal Kent is powerful, but he isn't surviving a God Blast of this magnitude.
The God Blast has defeated beings like Galactus, and the leader of the Dark Gods (Who was a Cosmic Entity at that level I reckon.). This one will be a great deal more powerful.
Go ahead. I'll lol at the level of stupidity that so me KMC posters posses.
everybody by now already know that you are nothing but a thor fanboy but sometimes you need to shut up because your f^ckin godblast only effected a hungry galactus and as was stated it didnt effect exiter , superman 1 million has way too many crazy feats like creating force fields powerful enough to contain beings that could destroy the planet, he can punch the freakin time Lol superman 1 million is way too crazy for the godblast that was able to hurt a hungry weak galactus now f^ck off
Last edited by battleclub on May 24th, 2010 at 07:48 PM
No This shows that Thor can't even hurt a celestial from the inside while it is ignore his it. Galactus now is possibly > Celestial
You using a weaker Galactus to claim it will kill Galactus is laughable. When even Thor's Mjolnir throw was hurting him and he was fighting ego at that time while weakened.
We have seen Thor's attack to nothing to Galactus in recent time it doesn't do anything. So yes I find it funny that you would use a Galactus that was having problem with Ego and was hurt my Mjolnir.
Yes if it can't even hurt a Celestial from the inside out I find it hard that it will Kill the guys I have listed.
dude galactus was weakened in that fight he was hurted by mjolnir so now if we go by your logic mjolnir can kill anyone who is under galactus power level? he was also hurt by ego he was hungry and weaken those are facts
superman 1 million while not my favorite character is for sure a crazy beast give the guy his credit he did crazy stuff
Galactus being hurt by a Mjolnir throw doesn't mean he was weakened or hungry. A Mjolnir throw has toppled both Surtur and Ymir, taken down Hela in her realm, A Mjolnir throw has hurt Argus when he had most of the power of the Crucible of life itself.
Lol, how on Earth is believing that anyone below Galactus would be killed by a Mjolnir throw using my logic?
He was defeating Ego. When did Ego hurt him in that fight pray tell?
so now you are trying to defend that mjolnir hurting galactus feat? you know sometimes there is some crap called PIS you know like wolverine claws hurting thanos and stuff like that? because i can show you 10000 showings of mjolnir doing crap to juggernaut who laugh it off or the fact mjolnir couldnt even ko beings like hulk and namor dont even try to say that mjolnir is that powerful
facts are if mjolnir attack was able to hurt thanos then its a PIS which also means the god blast was the same since it never proved its strength like that
and its a fact that galactus was hungry and weak it was stated its a fact
Again, at that time Celestials were the top dogs. Above beings like Galactus and almost everyone else so I fail to see how this proves anything.
Galactus was no further down the food chain then than he is now. He definitely was shaped out as a character a good bit more though.
Even if Galactus had gotten noticeably more powerful, this God Blast would be a great deal more superior than the God Blast that he used against Galactus back then.
If you think since then his attacks have not done anything to Galactus period, you should read Fantastic Four #242. By the way, Thor has never used the Godblast against him again.
Why not? Despite what you might want to believe, there was an era where the Celestials were above Galactus.
That wasn't a low showing for the Godblast but a high showing for the Celestials. That Godblast must have been packing far more energy than needed to destroy an entire Galaxy.
I suggest you should read Thor #160 and #161. Find me where it states Galactus was hungry, or weakened, and then I will concede.
I'm supposed to take the word of a random page of an annual that goes directly against what happened in the actual comic we're discussing? That same page stated that the Destroyer armor was on the level of Galactus and could destroy him. I guess you take that as %100 fact as well right?
Again with narrations. Next you'll be posting captions.
The writers considered Celestials as the most powerful entities at the time.
(please log in to view the image)
I got this off an issue after the death of the Destroyer. I want to say #304 or #305 but I'm not sure. I'd say look at the first 10 issues after the Destroyer/Fourth Host battle and you'd find it pretty quickly.
__________________
Last edited by Rage.Of.Olympus on May 24th, 2010 at 08:24 PM
I have read it and in fact own both. As you point out it was a recton of sorts and you admitted this to be the case. Whether you like it or not is irrelevant
No, it was just the ignorance of the writer (Peter Sanderson as I recall. Never even heard of that guy.) who I doubt actually read the issues in question.
It makes no sense for Galactus to weakened by hunger and exhausted. That same little box of text said Thor defeated Galactus only by calling on the power of Odin. Plain and simple ignorance is all.
You must also think the Destroyer is powerful enough to destroy Galactus right?
That's not proof that's like me posting scans of bio that say Galactus is the strongest in the Universe.
Celestial were never the most powerful entities and there power has decreased you just think so because they owned your Asgard.
Also like I mentioned before Thor's hammer hurting Galactus shows he was weakend considering Thor and the rest of earth amping couldn't hurt a weakened Galactus recently.
? It shows you the mentality of how writers viewed the Celestials at the time.
They were the top dogs at that time. The Asgardians suffered by being the first to face the Celestials after they were integrated into the mainstream MU. When something debuts, it is always more impressive than it becomes over time. I never understand why people used Thor #300 as some kind of evidence against Odin. Galactus would have had his ass beat down just as thoroughly if he had been there.
No, it really doesn't. A charged Mjolnir throw hurting him does not prove that Galactus was weakened at all. The energy Mjolnir packs plus the force of the blow has always been devastating and has had other impressive feats other than damaging the almighty Galactus. Shit, look at the time Masterson and Dargo attacked each other.
KMC Community Forums
May 24th, 2010 07:34 PM
