^ Galan007 is not immune to making retarded statements. Given that the alternate multiversal versions of the Justice League were vaporized but the actual Justice League weren't vaporized suggests that there was some macguffin that allowed that to happen, i.e., the cosmic anvil.
Let me know when you want to argue with me directly instead of hiding behind your teacher's skirt. Given that I've had multiple IP addresses but wouldn't know a poster's decade old username, I'd do nothing but stay with the same conclusion. But go ahead, ask a mod if your IP address matches any past poster. You're not even addressing what I posted. Moreover, you're pretending to have posted something different. Are you trying to rewrite the course of our discussion again?
Is that your go-to approach when you can't continue arguing in a constructive manner?
Am I supposed to utterly deconstruct this WF punch feat as opposed to simply point out the feckin obvious?
Because you just need one click and *anyone* can see your previous username?
(please log in to view the image)
Sure, we can ask Galan or Pr to do that. But I want you to (at least) give me an apology for denigrating me
Again, what is your point that worth addressing, when there is no evidence?
Like holding a (even one of mods said that) hilarious stance to dismiss that feat?
Edit for your edit:
Or because it's a trope that we saw it happen all the time in comics? For example: Flashes race destroying the Multiverse but the Earth didn't get destroyed in the process
Last edited by qwertyuiop1998 on Dec 31st, 2022 at 08:56 PM
^ Page-breaking nub. How ironic this is the same excuse that other socks have used.
Is it supposed to be less embarrassing that you're so resentful you researched my profile in the hopes of finding something useful to insult me than just being a sock? Trying to pretend the shoe is on the other foot isn't a winning strategy, son.
But I understand that's all you're reduced to. Consider yourself informed.
If some random poster started insulting Philosophia in a thread by making fun of his old Erik Lensherr username, I'd think he was a sock. Because seriously... why would any random poster be desperate enough to resort to researching a profile for innocuous ammo to insult them with? But you do you.
Because Superman annihilating a multiverse w/ a punch shockwave, along with the alternate multiversal Justice League, but only leaving a crater in a planet and the actual Justice League intact who were right next to them is speculation? That's what happened on-panel.
Ain't no way to read comics, boy. Not unless you have some crudely immature agenda over fictional characters.
But.....plot armour exists in comics, right? The Beyonder fired off a blast that would have destroyed a billion million multiverses or whatever - but it didn't even singe the curtains, as an example; the Frost King fired off blasts that GLs needed shields against, but Batman just turns his back on ; Superman and Doomsday throw punches that blow windows out and register on seismographs around the world, but Lois and Jimmy are next to them etc etc
Probably shit examples, but my point is still there
Because you first accusing me for lying and mocking my English?
And ironically, you also don't like it, but when the positions switched, you accuse me a sock account, ok
So collateral damage, ok
Plus, You literally get a scene that depicted Superman and Doomsday's shockwaves were destroying their surroundings, Which should be able to kill lois and others by your logic https://ibb.co/MCQK1v8
If there were random characters who were as durable as the Avengers standing around completely unaffected by that Mjolnir clash and some random cosmic cube attuned to a multiverse that were destroyed, you'd have something similar to the WF scene.
As it stands, you don't. The desperation is palpable. The presence of collateral damage is meaningful. It's absence isn't.
But if you're trying to argue collateral damage was responsible for a feat whilst ignoring that collateral damage selectively did not affect other things, you've got a problem, son.
At the impact of Superman's punch, we saw the alternate multiversal Justice League be destroyed. They were in direct H2H combat and proximity with the actual Justice League. We're supposed to believe Superman's punch's collateral damage obliterated them, didn't touch the Justice League and then went on to obliterate an entire multiverse? Selective plot armor + an inconceivably exponentially greater scope of punching power is more realistic to explain that stark contrast than the simply convenient plot device of the crisis anvil being destroyed?
Let's not be stupid about this. Feat-fishing is one thing. Ignoring the glaringly obvious is just insulting.
Hmm, such anally strict demands...it almost like saying "this Superman's feat is definitely not the way it was stated in the comics, although I don't have any explicit evidence to disprove it"
You want to argue shockwaves should kill others. We have Day of Doom where we saw Superman and Doomsday' fight were creating explosions and destroying its surroundings, yet, Lois and others stand right around them( as shown in DoS) wasn't affected
You want ot argue scope, Flashes' race were destroying the Multiverse, yet the Earth remains largely unaffected etc
Edit:
Also here, Superman and Jaxon generated enough energy to restore infinite timelines, yet didn't kill anyone there
I actually did disprove it given the alternate multiversal Justice League were obliterated but not the actual Justice League who were standing right next to them, unless they alla sudden have multiversal durability...
... whatever is necessary to aggrandize a Superman feat, eh? If there were some alternate Perry White and Cat Grant standing next them who were vaporized while Lois Lane and Jimmy Olsen were unharmed, I'd think there were some plot device responsible. As it stands, we had the crisis anvil in the scene we're speaking of. But ignore the convenient plot device, sure...
... whatever is necessary to inflate a Superman feat, eh? How tiresomely quick Superfanboys are to reach to Flash as if that somehow reverse-inflated Superman's own feats. Jebus, if it weren't such a consistent trait amongst ya'll, it'd be a caricature.
Superman... the other Speedforce-user that never actually used the Speedforce.
Well...yeah. Superman and Doomsday punched each other hard enough to blow windows out, cause seismograph readings...but completely unaffected Lois. Selective collateral damage.
And if an alternate Perry White and Cat Grant were shredded to pieces whilst Lois Lane and Jimmy Olsen were completely unharmed, I'd think there were some plot device at play.
I appreciate you not breaking the page anymore (too late), but I can't actually read these scans that appear to be pre-Crisis from the tiny images I see. Ignoring the dispositive evidence isn't going to make it go away. Let's not actually read the comic. Let's gloss over it to distort the plain presentation of the scene. But go ahead and hide your head in the sand.
(please log in to view the image) (please log in to view the image) (please log in to view the image) (please log in to view the image) (please log in to view the image) (please log in to view the image) (please log in to view the image)
And ignoring you have literally no actual evidence to prove your speculations also doesn't make it go away, much like you accusing me for sock account despite you absolutely have no evidence of it
Especially your "dispositive evidence" can be easily explained by plot armor
Or 6th dimension works differently
Or Superman directed his force to WF and his Multiverse, like SBP did in Death Metal Secret Origin or some DB style
etcetcetc
Do I have a explicit evidence to prove it?No, but in the same way you also can't provide a definite evidence to prove what you claimed
Edit:
IOW, we have on-panel statements that *directly* support Superman what Superman did