So basically it's turned to another Superman vs Thor debate.
"If Superman makes a smudge..then Thor makes a scratch!"
Thor has his nice feats..nobody is denying that...but so do Superman, DD, and Darkseid..all who failed to damage the armor in any way at all.
__________________
Humans are afraid of the dark.
And yet… At the same time, we’re fascinated and bewitched by it.
Maybe that’s why humans drink the darkness that is coffee.
I do think the Godblast, his ultimate attack would do more damage than most anything Superman or DD could put out, not gonna say Darky tho.
And the only reason why this started, was because i thought i remembered Superman doing minimal damage to the Aegis, to which you said you don't see any such thing, but if it did, it's no low feat.
And then you basically implied Thor couldn't replicate even a minimal amount of damage, even if Superman did.
And i don't defend Sentry.
My stance on Sentry is that his implied power from his conception suggests that he's on a level above the conventional top tier(of which Superman is included, even if he is at the pinnacle), and his absence of low feats don't hurt his standing either.
Debunked.
And Entropic Energy is Entropic Energy..........
Unless Superman takes Entropy eyebeams to the face and only goes "arghh", amirite?
It's the ultimate energy null unless Superman takes multiple blasts and doesn't rip his costume.........
bioauras>entropy?
And i maintain that energy blast absorbtion is something Thor does extremely well.
He doesn't need to worry about durability if the magical plot device absorbs it.
Gender: Male Location: Hiding from The Doctor, shhhh.....
I have actual credibility most of the time. You on the other hand, are proving you are an idiot. Superman gets the nod from DC's writers alot, but even he could barely damage the armor. 2nd, the hammer CAN'T absorb Entropy, and Thor would get ass-raped if he tried to fight that thing. Godblast might do damage, (which I doubt), but it won't do anything major and it definitely won't stop the armor.
and Superman>>>Sentry.
__________________ Wanted: New sig. Something crazy, zany, and slightly evil. Will give sig credit to whoever's I sport.
The only thing said is that when it comes too straight up damage few if any in the top-tier can match him which includes Superman or Doomsday which people are bringing up.
The point is just because those two failed doesn't mean Thor would because he has a higher damage output then them.
As for DS well his ability to do damage is kind off some times. Sometimes it looks like he can destroy anything while other times he gets punked.
Gender: Male Location: Anti-Forum Elitist. I put Elitist i
Account Restricted
Thor has higher dmg output than who? He may be more versatile. But THor's Dmg Output is not nearly as high as Doomsday's, who was able to stalemate a guardian. It's not as high as Orion's. Who is able to fight DS hand to hand for week's on end and blast away galaxies. And it sure ain't as high as Superman's. Superman's splits planets with his fist. Thor would have to call upon every ounce of Godly power to do that. And he's slow on the uptake. Where as Superman just hits something in anger and flies away not tired at all. Try again.
No, he just punched Imperiex into pieces instead. I believe invisible woman chased off Galactus once too, are you going to make a case for her having higher damage output than Superman? Part of the problem with Galactus is that he has these high end showings blowing up a solar system or something, and then a team of guys that couldn't even get decent numbers against Wonder Woman chase him off. Hardly seems credible.
__________________
I am God's mighty fist. I am God's strength made manifest.
Sig by: Skeets, S.S, thesilverspider, Sir SKEETS Alot
KMC Community Forums
Jun 13th, 2007 04:41 AM
