it was after that issue iirc. the elan and watchers were first, then the big ass celestial mother ship of the forth host showed up and the watcher theorized that they either came to watch or came to do something but recognized the futility as the watchers did.
that issue was when maelstrom was showing off that he was going to do something cosmic up in that bit(h
Gender: Male Location: Drinking gasoline. Pissing napalm.
Yeah, #25 I think. Or possibly #30, which involved Quasar going to an alt universe at the request of Uatu where Maelstrom duels IG-Thanos for control of the universe...But, I have neither of those issues on my computer.
Meh, omniverse wasn't mentioned, so only universal power(and he wasn't even going to destroy the universe the good old fashioned way).
Average Galactus is the weakest of all the abstracts, so I fail to see how talking smack to him is anything to be mentioned to people in Abraxas' league.
Multi-Eternity had to cry out for help against big A.
BTW if Abraxas appeared in the same comic as Mael(the date) he would have already destroyed the universe, seeing that Galactus couldn't recall the UN to himself.
i could be of some help cause i keep all my cosmic stuff in a box.....which i'm looking at in the distance..... but too lazy right now to do anything about.
Gender: Male Location: Drinking gasoline. Pissing napalm.
He says 'cosmos' multiple times, which sometimes means that universe and sometimes the omniverse. Secondary keyword is that it was eating "Infinity's Body"...IE, all there is...IE, the omniverse.
"omniverse" implies he will be erasing the cartoons and movies as well as every single universe down to the microverse, negative zone, liefield turd, etc (which is the multiverse).
Multiple cosmoes could mean a few universes, not even a multi-verse. So we need better info for that. But what we are sure is that Abraxas was eventually going to destroy the multi-verse.
TRUE Infinity is only multi-versal, not omniversal. and the Infinity that appeared in the Infinity saga wasn't "true Infinity". Unless you mean that since 616 is the prime reality, destroying it would cause a chain reaction and thus destroy the omniverse?
I was happy that we had gotten away from these kinds of threads about abstracts... sigh..
@big colossus C. do you actually own comics.. or do you just steal pics from others. I've seen a history of you asking for scans.. then later posting them.. i 'm not sure you have any idea where the issues come from... makes me think you just take other peoples work and try to pass it off as your own...
@galactischere... you immediately tried to turn this into a un vs ig argument. if thats what you really wanted, theres already threads for that. how do i know? the first page and 2nd reply... stop trying to create a bait thread just so you have your own thread... you could just as easily gone and written in one of the others...
when it comes to cosmic stories you'll end up in these... cyliccal loops...
ie... just read strange issue 4... and see what it mentions about eternity... my head hurts trying to remember all the little vague references to the universe over the past 30 years.
one could make the argument that abraxas collapses the universe with the ig in it... winning the match...
someone else could say... that ig defeated un which defeated abraxas therefore thanos should win...
yay me?
__________________ Quotes from Hia8:
"I claimed that the science is sometimes faulty."
"You don't understand. This is fiction. That means none of this stuff really happened."
"There is no writer to purposely ignore a character's natural ability just because it suits the story."
"in some cases because the writer knows that Character A will dominate Character B easily and refuses to allow this to happen for the sake of the story."
KMC Community Forums
Feb 15th, 2010 03:03 AM
