But you dont have any proof that it was the same Godblast. Your "evidence" is a personal theory about authors intetion. Is hard to we debate if you best argument is your ideas about authors mind.
We should debate about we see in the comics. And the comics show to us the two Godblast were not the same. The attack against Celestials was far stronger.
Mjolnir was with durability amped in the first Godblast, and still was destroyed. Thor was not weakead in that story. And it was a much more extreme situation than the fight against Juggernaut.
In the second one, he was weakened. Thor weakened = weaker Godblast. There is no room for debate in this point, is a fact. In the second one, the Mjolnir didnt exploded.
Galactus has the feats obviously, although it's not insane when people assume Juggs might be more durable by default, it's not always about overall power, everybody knows Galactus is billion times more powerful and can amp his durability to an unknown level. It's just Jugg's default and main super power is to be immune to physical damage, that's what he's mostly known for. Then there are guys like Butterball who is completely useless power-wise compared to low level metas even yet can laugh off a nuclear blast.
__________________
Azula: My mommy didn't love me so I'm going to burn down your village.
There something you need to know. This stuff is fantasy. It never happened. There is no such thing as any of this stuff. We know something because it is in the mind of the writer that is revealed through his writing, not that it actually occurred (because it didn't)).
The Godblast was the same because the writer WANTED IT TO BE as said through the narration. That is all folks.
Actually it is, considering that the method they use for making such an assumption is to take Juggernaut's highest feats and compare them to Galactus' lowest feats. And Juggernaut isn't completely invulnerable to harm either, as his various comic book appearances have shown us.
If we take averages, it's obvious that Galactus is much more durable than Juggernaut.
What are you talking about. When Juggs has his forcefield then nothing in comics has been shown to harm him. In other words, he doesn't even have 1 showing that shows him getting hurt or damaged when he is written with a forcefield. So his average with the forcefield is the highest feat he has achieved.
P.S. All the instances of Juggs getting hurt was without his forcefield.
Except Onslaught owning him like a b1tch and ripping the Crimson gem out of his supposedly indestructible body.
Juggernaut's best durability feats are dwarfed by Galactus' best feats. Galactus' lowest is nowhere near as bad as Juggernaut's lowest feats. This much is indisputable fact not up for debate.
Im not sure why this required 4 pages of debating.
I remember in those early X-Men issues (in the 60s) some wind machine taking out Juggernaut's force field for a while when he crashed into one (yeah, seems like Galactus-level). And well, without his force field, i could mention several characters way below Galactus who have hurt him . Not to mention that Juggernaut doesn't even use his force field all that much. Even if the writer has him activate it in the same issue, he just turns it off after a while despite being in a dangerous situations. Happened several times in comics.
Galactus should win rather easily, no argument about it.
KMC Community Forums
May 30th, 2014 01:06 PM
but sadly you're wasting your time saying this to h1
