I like how thedkeffect's argument is basically, my biased opinion trumps your valid evidence source.
__________________ posted by Badabing
I don't know why some of you are going on about being right and winning. Rob and Impediment were in on this gag because I PMed them. Silent and Rao PMed me and figured I changed the post. I highly doubt anybody thought Quan made the post, but simply played along just for the lulz.
Anyhow, I supported (page 1,2 and 3) my claim that McClane (who has both hands free) could use/fire the Boolean gun, all you've done is make unsupported claims and danced/dodged when asked to provide proof, as per the trolling MO you're well known for in KMC.
So McClane uses the vastly superior firepower and range the boolean gun provides him over Khan's stun-gun and shoots Khan dead. Now do your thing again.
Not with the accuracy or strength of Khan. You didn't support the gun is light and easy to use since Khan is the only one to use it and since he has super strength.
You cited wiki which is another person's take on the film as evidence this proving you can't debate for shit on your own.
Anyhow, my claim was: "McClane can use the Boolean gun, he even has both hands free here"
I used Wiki to support that, Wiki is allowed in here as per the MVF rules (read them). So once again you lost, have nothing and are trolling as per your usual MO. Now do your thing again.
I never said he can't use the gun I said he can't use it with the same skill and ease that Khan did.
Khan is faster and your article supports only Khan using it since he's the only one who wielded it. Another person edited the wiki and I'd rather talk to him as he can clearly form an argument but you can't.
Someone else edited it but that does t change the fact the only guy who wielded it had super strength. John isn't anywhere near as strong as Khan and isn't as accurate either. Khan wins, easily.
KMC Community Forums
Aug 5th, 2015 01:38 AM
