Easy. AOS showed even an Asgardian farmer is completely knife and bullet proof. We've also seen Thor's physical inferior (Loki) brush of bullets.
So quit being ridiculous.
Lol writer's intent is just your excuse to believe whatever you like. We go by on screen feats, and Thor's durability feats are massively above bullets. Unless you think a bullet can crush a Leviathan
LMAO @ no where to run. He was in an open space. Quit trolling me.
You've lost as per YOUR OWN LOGIC.
It was YOUR Logic that if he can take it he wouldn't avoid it, and if he can't then he would.
He didn't avoid it the SECOND time, Ergo, he knows now he can take it AS PER YOUR OWN LOGIC.
He toppled the thing over, What the heck?
Let's not forget the same guy also toppled Surtur. So again quit trolling, trying your best to lowball all Marvel feats.
Thor took a Leviathan crushing punch and Surtur toppling punch straight to the nose (he basically allowed Hulk to hit him talking him down).
Onus is on you to prove Zod has taken a hit like that straight to the nose whilst standing there and being hit (remember he took multiple hits from Hulk in Ragnarok before bleeding).
You made no real rebuttal to the exploding ship. It doesn't matter which direction you think it exploded Thor was in the centre of the damn ship. So quit your trolling and show me where Zod has taken such a hit.
He looked sick AF. And was in a coma. So he didn't take it well at all. You're not proving anything here, and as already mentioned Zod didn't take the nuke.
Why are you avoiding my point? I posted that to prove that no force on Earth compares to the full force of our Sun. Way to miss the point.
Except it was explained that the beam was emitting the full force of the star. So Quit downplaying feats you dont like.
So he was going to figuratively die as well ?
Quit this nonesense. Either show an extract from the writers/directors that it was figurative, or kindly quit your lies.
Shows how strong Thor is.
I have already proved to you that's not true.
Except that beam produced the full force of a star, as noted on screen.
He didn't need cover. Just needed to move out of it's path.
You lose as per your own logic.
You're a self defeating debater.
There was no force or shrapnel in the centre of an exploding ship? Wow.
Btw even Valkyrie was caught in an explosion with literally no harm at all. Not to mention Thor survived Sokovia exploding FFS.
Are you getting tried of your ridiculous Marvel lowballing yet? Because we all sure are.
Last edited by Darth Thor on Jun 23rd, 2021 at 11:19 AM
Farmer wasn't knife proof. He bent the knife from the side.
Being bullet proof isn't enough. You have to be bulletproof of the highest level (aircraft bullets).
Superman is Thor's physical superior. Should Superman get his durability feats too? Hulk punch did almost nothing to the Leviathan. I went over that already. If you disagree then address what I said about the feat. Also, even if the feat was legit, it still has no bearing on the force we actually see Hulk hit Thor with.
Thor is not a speedster. Where the phuck was he going to go? The fire didn't last long. Those bullets were less powerful than the other ones.
He didn't topple shit with the punch. Hulk didn't slow it down enen 5% with the punch. More than 95% of the slow down was Hulk pushing and holding back the Leviathan AFTER THE PUNCH.
I don't have to prove things that you can see. The walls of the ship were charged with energy. The walls exploded outward. Thor was relatively safe by being in the center. You see little to no shrapnel pass through the center. You are confusing that feat with an explosion that originates in front of Thor and towards him.
Zod has taken hits that knocked him almost a mile through the air. Taken hits that created large craters as a side effect.
Taken hits that launched him through skyscrapers.
All of those are far more powerful than the hits we actually see Thor get hit with. You argued hypothetically if both can survive a nuke then it still is less than the star feat.
If you disagree with the reasoning "since Zod is a near equal to Clark in the physical department then he gets his durability feats" then the same can be applied to Thor. Thor gets no one's feats .
But his skin wasn't melted was all I was addressing. Superman didn't die. Thor would have.
The article didn't mention force, it mentioned energy output. Then mentioned we have the sun beat in temperature. What does more damage? :
1. Getting hit with a hose of 30 degree Celsius water for 5 minutes (more energy)?
or
2. from a quick splash of 3000 degree liquid? Use common sense.
"Force force of the Sun" has no meaning just as the "full force of a crayon" doesn't. That's the common sense reason why it was figurative talk. It makes no sense to be literal (has no meaning).
Forces push and pull (by definition).
Stars only forces are gravity and magnetism. Thor wasn't getting hit by gravity or magnetism was he? Lol. It was a pure beam of radiation used to heat and melt the metal.
Wrong terminology. You mean a character stated, "full force of a star" as figurative language to mean full temperature.
It was figurative because it makes no sense to be literal. Isn't that how we can tell the difference between figurative language and literal language?
Incorrect. Thor was being pushed through space with a certain acceleration. Only Mass (not durability or strength) resists acceleration in free moving objects.
There was some force. I didn't see any shrapnel pass through the center.
Sokovia wasn't a good feat either.
Since you are lazy.
I stated that Thor could possibly take more heat than Zod (which is in the thread) assuming Zod =/= Superman.
Darth then stated Thor can take more heat than Superman (both of them). That's where I disagreed and argued from there.
So me assuming Zod =/= Superman is not a correct one?
I somehow derailed the thread.
Darth equating Thor to feats of other characters not in the thread is ok though? You didn't address him on that. Pick and choose for your bias.
Stop lying, you were the first person in this thread to mention Superman
__________________ posted by Badabing
I don't know why some of you are going on about being right and winning. Rob and Impediment were in on this gag because I PMed them. Silent and Rao PMed me and figured I changed the post. I highly doubt anybody thought Quan made the post, but simply played along just for the lulz.
If one part of a multifaceted statement is incorrect then the whole statement is incorrect. My reply "incorrect" wasn't referring to who mentioned Superman first, it referred to another part of the statement.
With that said
I stated assuming Superman =/= Zod.
Was that a wrong statement?
What about Darth mentioning feats by Loki for Thor to share or him mentioning characters not in the thread (Hulk, etc)?
IIRC, in materials outside of the film (maybe one of the official fim comics), it was stated that Zod was not as powerful as Superman since his exposure to a yellow sun and Earth's atmosphere was very short compared to Kal's lifelong exposure. But Zod's superior fighting ability and genetic-warrior makeup allowed him to contend. Zod specifically brags about the later.
You're the one that brought him up, thus FrothByte's statement was correct. no need for you to continue lying about it
__________________ posted by Badabing
I don't know why some of you are going on about being right and winning. Rob and Impediment were in on this gag because I PMed them. Silent and Rao PMed me and figured I changed the post. I highly doubt anybody thought Quan made the post, but simply played along just for the lulz.
It's really the only explanation that would have made sense considering Kal'el was a farm boy who's never been in a decent fight his entire life whereas Zod is a bred and trained warrior who's the head of the kryptonian military.
I don't think Kal had ever been in a fight before Zod and crew showed up, he was strong enough to crush steel as a 12yo, he'd have accidentally murdered any human he fought.
Ill talking to an illiterate fool. Multifaceted is the key. Focusing on one part of a statement and not all the parts shows your level of intelligence. FrothByte said multiple things in the statement i replied incorrect to. Use your common sense to find out which part he said was incorrect.
A human can snap another humans neck. Vultrimites can gore other stronger vultrimites.
Snapping someones neck doesn't prove stronger.
I replied to your lengthy post before you commented here. Did you miss it?
I disagree. Zod was hitting Clark with more force than the other way around. No where in the film do we get a sense where Clark is stronger. Both rammed with pure force (not skill) into each and canceled each OTHER out AS EQUALS. What is shown by movie >>> interviews.
Zod proven that he is a close peer to Superman in MOS. Actually Zod hit Superman harder than Superman hit him. Anyone unbiased will tell you that. Its clear as day the two were close as hell physically in MOS.
Also you are now equating different durabilities (heat, cut, blunt, etc) when at first you were separating them.
Tbh I have no problem giving Thor Loki's durability feats. But i have a problem when the same isnt done for other characters when they are clearly about equal. Clark wasn't shown stronger than Zod. Actually maybe slightly weaker imo.
Zod is more durable than Thor against blunt force.
Zod is more durable than Thor against high temperatures assuming Superman is more than Zod but less than 2x Zod.
Blunt force is the most important aspect of durability, then cutting, then energy.
My rankings
Zod
Silver Samurai
Mjolnir
Ultron
Thor (Thor has Ultron beat in temperature though)
Wonder Woman
Aquaman
Iron man.
His entire statement was correct, thus even with your backtracking, you're still wrong.
BTW, it's "I'm" not "Ill", a literate person would know that.
__________________ posted by Badabing
I don't know why some of you are going on about being right and winning. Rob and Impediment were in on this gag because I PMed them. Silent and Rao PMed me and figured I changed the post. I highly doubt anybody thought Quan made the post, but simply played along just for the lulz.
__________________ posted by Badabing
I don't know why some of you are going on about being right and winning. Rob and Impediment were in on this gag because I PMed them. Silent and Rao PMed me and figured I changed the post. I highly doubt anybody thought Quan made the post, but simply played along just for the lulz.
KMC Community Forums
Jun 23rd, 2021 05:49 AM
