That was prior to him being unkillable and able to come back. He also wasn't oneshotted he was nearly defeated with one blast but it depleted vital energuies from gaalctus with just one shield.
When did Galactus say he died? And he obviously doesn't feat the UN. He pwned Abraxas with it and proved that the UN is a part of him. Recent comic > older comic.
Scan(s).
And that wasn't FP Galactus. Sorry.
Post it.
And why isn't it? I mean that Galactus was 616 Galactus at his best and like the OP said, we're supposed to discuss the most powerful version of him.
Also, Galactus is as powerful as Mistress Death. I don't see how you can think Mistress Death's avatar can challenge her equal.
Last edited by TheTyrant on Dec 16th, 2010 at 11:10 PM
This is Andy schmidt answering questions regarding annihilation.
He explained it point blank and him being described as the only one with the killing blow in him should be enough proof anyways.
It's pretty simple, really. Drax has other powers that precent Thanos' natural Eternal-atom-control thing from working when he's around. Remember, Drax was created to kill Thanos. He probably couldn't beat Thor in a fight, heck, he'd have a tough time beating Wolverine perhaps, but Thanos he can kill.
this thread is hypothetical for a 616 Galactus. Omega at full power is a lot more powerful than Galactus and Thanos withstood his blasts also.
Yes, and he knew he probably would have died but don't forget he was attacked by minions of Galactus as well which he doesn't have here.
Yes, one shield. His 3 best against Omega who was a lot more powerful than Galactus shows at his best with his new power to come back an dupgrade this is a wrap for him.
Thanos wasn't ko'd there either he stated killed so I don't see the chances of him just being ko'd if anything death then he comes back again whereas Galactus is a lot weaker.
He was turned back into Galactus by Valerie and Frankie. He never died. He turned into a sun with infinite energy.
I meant the shields. How did Drax get past them? The dude said nothing about Drax's powers negating Thanos's shields, so how come a guy who he believed would have a hard time with Wolverine get past through Thanos's shields so easily?
He explained it point blank and him being described as the only one with the killing blow in him should be enough proof anyways.
When have Quasar or Genis-Vell (can't remember which one it was) seen a fed Galactus? They compared him to the Galactus they had seen which happens to be a weakened Galactus.
Galactus > his retarded clone (Thanos even said the thing was retarded).
FF, Thor, Iron Man went a few years into the future of their own universe (616). There, they saw an alt time-line Tiamut (still in 616) controlling an alt time-line Galactus (still in 616). This all means that the Galactus shown in that story was from universe 616.
They warranted his attention for Galactus to be right over top of him with him distracted.
Yes, it formed into one shield not three. In the Omega showing he has 3.
Thanos Imperative. Unkillable, power to kill the unkillables in the cancerverse, gamora's blade broke on his skin, tossing around mar-vell like he was the surfer or something.
Oneshotted means defeated in one shot. It would have taken two to beat him.
The comic made it clear he was probably going to die with another shot and he wans't ko'd so you make the call. Arguing my points isn't trolling.
They did nothing to him. Galactus would have blasted him anyway.
All defensive shielding means all defensive shielding.
That's not an upgrade relevant to offensive or even defensive powers. That's just more powers and two new showings.
He got hit once and gave up. That equals one shotted.
He gave up after getting hit once. One shotted. He gets hit again, and he'd be out... without even the chance of giving up = win.
It is when you're trolling.
Meh just ignoring Quan and the stuff he's typing at this point. He keeps making the same points over and over again and they are being refuted with several different arguments... Continuing on how far does Galactus go. I say 7-8
They caused his attention to be on them and not Galactus for the moment which gave Galactus the upper hand in that situation.
Yes, all doesn't mean 4,5,12, it looked like one shield whereas he used 3 against Omega and the number is irrelevant to the issue at hand. He's used far more powerful shields against a more powerful character than Galactus, Omega.
Killing unkillable beings means are you powerful enough to do so. If Lt can do so that doesn't mean he has a new ability it means he is powerful enough to do so. You sound like blackbolt here.
Oneshotted to me means ko'd or killed. Thanos was being intelligent and only wanted to talk anyways.
We disagree on the definition of oneshotted and I have backed my case. You can disagree with it all you want but when I back up my case it isn't trolling it's debating.
What would have changed? Would Thanos' shields have magically withstood?
It means all the defensive shielding at his disposal. Which I'm guessing is more than just 3 shields. Unless you're arguing that all of Thanos' defensive shielding is less than what was shown before.
No, it means he has the ability to kill unkillable beings. It has nothing to do with raw power. He would have destroyed the beings anyway with raw power, they just would have came back if he didn't gain that ability. He has to be powerful enough to destroy them in the first place. He's not going to suddenly kill a Celestial just because of this ability (please don't answer this).
One shotted to me means the fight is over forcibly in one shot. Which it was, because Thanos gave up after being hit once.
You have no case. You've used nothing to prove anything... at all. You're just arguing about Thanos vs Galactus with no substance to it at all. You could argue LT vs Immortal Man with the logic you're employing. You're trolling, you know you are. You've ruined a seemingly good thread with your Thanos drivel, yet again.
He could survive minutes with someone who is much more powerful than Galactus so you decide it's a lot more than two blasts though that's for sure.
Thanos used whatever he had near him in the form of one shield or however many is irrelevant because it wasn't as powerful as the Omega shield.
So if Lt can do so does it mean he has the special ability or the power to do so ?
I disagree entirely and it has to do with raw power not special abilities.
I think oneshot means ko'd or killed not giving up since you just wanted his attention anyways and never wanted to fight him.
I do have a case. Thanos has the power on panel to level Galactus. Galactus weakens with every blast he implores due to losing vital energies. These are facts not like I am hiding from their battle itself I am using that along with Thanos' unkillable nature and logically concluding he wins.
I don't know what you're talking about. Re-word that or something.
What are you talking about? Making up things yet again?
Thanos used ALL his shielding. That is more powerful than 3 shields he put up in the nick of time.
It means LT has the ability to override Death. I hope you're not trying to compare LT to Thanos though...
That makes no sense. So, if it's raw power, would this mean that Thanos has more raw power than Galactus? Never seen Galactus kill an unkillable being off the top of my head... that must mean Thanos can not only beat Galactus, but he also has more power! Do you agree with this?
A special power is exactly what it is. He can override death because Lady Death allows this.
Thanos landed the first hit. Got hit once, and gave up. One shotted. I'd point out that you argue that Thanos didn't give up against Odin and that's why he didn't lose... but you don't care at all about your hypocrisy so that would be fruitless.
Leveling doesn't mean a lot. Galactus doesn't weaken with every blast, except in that issue... but even going with this, Galactus was still unleashing a lot of power against against the universal parasite, and was readying another blast against Thanos, etc.
He's unkillable, not indestructible, not unKO'able. He just can't be killed. And getting knocked out, and getting charred to a skeleton would be a win.
Logic would be implying that it's reasonable. Considering how no one at all agrees with you, I wouldn't call that reasonable. You're not using logic at all, just some fanboy shit you use in every thread.
I will comment on a few things. By no means do I feel Thanos would beat Galactus.
That being said.. as we've seen Thanos shields vary in size, shape and power levels. Some are more powerful than others. In the Omega incident he prepped and planned for that encounter. Those shields withstood a concentrated blast for minutes before breaking. Against Galactus.. he wasn't going there looking for a fight or prepping with his best equipment. Which makes sense, since it took a much shorter concentrated blast for Galactus to pierce his "mere" forcefield. So I think those are some differences that should be noted.