Are you going to debate this time or just keep the lulz coming ?
Based on the relative ease in which Thor defeated Loki, the Destroyer, and all his foes. The guy was a beast powerless while Superman isn't skilled at all minus his powers. He got worked by a local diner bully.
Watch the movie the ease in which the Destroyer was so far beyond any threats save Thor and how much stronger regular asgardians were than humans.
Destroying cars and getting knocked into them didn't really damage asgardians that much. A manhole cover tossed at Superman obviously affected him it didn't break against his skin.
Thor defeated his enemies with relative ease while Superman struggled against opponents without impressive feats either.
I think you need to stop with the manhole cover Superman obviously has feats that change plus what is the context? Did other Kprtonians hit him with the manhole cover? Cause then it's not a low feat.
Besides Superman's feats from 1-4 pretty much make him better than anything Thor showed.
Thor's best showing that we can kind of quantify and understand is that landscape srushing attack he used.
Everything else doesn't matter.
The movie didn't focus on how much stronger the Asgardians are compared to humans, or in a way we can say they are in the same tier as Superman is based on feats. They really didn't have anything like that.
The destroyer suffers from the same thing. Implied power does not equate to real power. You can only go by feats.
The Destroyer was quite pathetic in the movie, the whole fight between it and Thor (and the warriors three) was barely causing any damage to the street it was taking place on.
Superman was poisoned with kryptonite and still lifted an island into space, he lifted an oceanliner too, before that.
There's no conceivable reason for arguing this. MOVIES versions are limited to what feats they demonstrate IN THE MOVIES. Superman has had far more showings and he generally is shown at levels of power not too far removed from the comics. Thor has yet to show anything above IronMan stuff... including hammering a 'silver knight' who couldn't even contend with a tornado.
Maybe Thor has some impressive feats in the '80s Hulk movie, but then he looked like Fabio so maybe not .
Nope, you wouldn't survive my debating with you.
So, lulz.
What did loki, destroyer and cannon fodder frost giants do that was so impressive? Who needs skill when you can just bash faces in at superspeed? This isn't powerless superman vs thor. Lulz at you quan.
You aren't getting the point he should be durable enough for the manhole cover to break off against him since since he isn't things such as this can obviously affect him.
Feats are feats but Thor's hammer and his strength are obviously enough to injure/defeat Superman based off the movies.
He didn't even blink at a point blank gun shot and the bullet flattened. That manhole was able to hurt superman because it was thrown by a kryptonian.
Again lulz.
Yes, a bullet didn't phase his eye but a manhole cover which was thrown far slower than a bullet hurt him. You can't dismiss certain feats and only use others.
Thor is far more skilled than Superman and ios powerful enough to hurt/destroy him.
They battled and defeated superman who has the feats, do you argue that captain marvel is a peer of superman on feats?
No, it wouldn't. Other than zoners, there isn't an instance in other canon movies where he was hurt by anything besides kryptonite.
thats because in movie 1 and returns, his villain is...gasp! lex luthor!
actually if you take the movies individually, In superman 2, superman or the kryptonian criminals didn't do anything impressive that i recall.
movies 1 and returns on the other hand have him at stupidly powerful levels.
if we go by movies
1 - Superman solos
2 - Thor could probably take superman, not too sure, been a while since i watched superman 2, come to think of it, i have a copy lying around somewhere, might as well go watch some superman 2 for the lols.
3 - Superman solos
He didn't easily evade a manhole or attacks from 3 slow knians who never used superspeed. In fact they were much slower in combat than Thor was on screen. Be objective.
It wasn't thrown faster than a bullet I suggest you rewatch the scene. Yes, but they didn't use superspeed one time. The manhole was thrown far slower than a bullet. The k-nians on screen fought with slower reaction time than Thor displayed.
Zoners didn't throw the manhole anywhere near as fast as a bullet. What other supernatural beings did Superman go up against which failed to hurt him ?
KMC Community Forums
Feb 16th, 2012 02:39 PM
.
