Gender: Male Location: +40° 36' 5.70", -73° 57' 49.46
I remember you making a joke at my expense when i was using an interview with the writer of the hulk in another thread, you are just so transparent....its sad...if you can determine when and where interviews can be used why cant others?
I can understand telling someone..to stop misleading, when opinions are used as fact, or when a poster puts his own words in brackets around on panel descriptions to mislead people, or when posters out right lie
Telling people who they have to vote for in a vesus match is based on a personel level...which you have no buisness dictating, we have rules and that enough, when your a mod i will take your words with some weight...untill then your another debator who uses his own methods to determine any outcome...simple
What thread and what joke? I have no clue can you send me a link to the thread on a pm so I can look at it myself.
I know everyone is free to their own decision but you cannot ignore a writers interview and on panel confirmation that supports what the writer said himself. These are facts you cannot argue with and if you do you can dispute anything which makes debating impossible. I am free to my own opinion and I think most are using their own preconeived notions no how powerful god is and forgetting this is comic and there has to be a struggle and it doesnt have to be logical or fit their personal descriptions of what god is to them.
In the end its just a comic book. Anyone catch the pun?
__________________
Last edited by quanchi112 on May 28th, 2008 at 03:26 PM
Gender: Male Location: +40° 36' 5.70", -73° 57' 49.46
I think it was a WWH vs ? and the interview was based on the fact that the writewr stated that thor would have been beat at the end of wwh when hulk went worldbreaker? it also said somthing to the effect that even superman would have been defeated, i made a point that in that comic the writer would have made it so wwh would win...and you made a remark about me including an interview....i will check around...but its not that important....the point is...
Posters will include website info and swear its good info...unlike wiki....then when the info does not jive with them...its not ok....but then its ok when the website and bio are the same,but its not ok if on panel does not jive
Posters will also include interviews then say that they are no good....but they are good with on panel verification, then we have on panel verification, but the bio's disagree etc .etc .etc
We all have our own way of debating and how we come to our own conclusions....but we cant start dictating those terms to others
Show me the rule where its stated on panel>bios
Show me the rules that say bio's>on panel
Show me the rules that state supreme=supreme=stalemate
These are a posters way of trying to say, i know more than you and my way is better...it might make sense in some cases and even the way most people think, but its not a rule we must follow
I think WW Hulk could beat Thor so I cant imagine myself saying that.
As far as Superman and WW Hulk I give it to WW Hulk handily but here is the difference as I see it. That writer had no control over Superman and in his mind he was above Superman but Superman is a dc character and thus he has no control whatsoever of Superman.
Starlin had control over marvel here and Thanos,he had it stated on panel that Thanos was god,supreme,etc. and also backs it up with an interview. There is no guesswork involved here.
On panel goes along with the interview here so there imo is no counter. Its a fact.
Gender: Male Location: +40° 36' 5.70", -73° 57' 49.46
Is that in this thread or any thread ever...cause i can meet every challenge...i just might need to show other threads from you....ok...now i dont want to see you getting angry if i do...so just let me know