KMC Forums - Full Power Galactus versus......

quote: (post)
Originally posted by quanchi112
Genis has cosmic awareness and used it to back up Thanos' statement on his own creation which he verified. The writer made his point clear you are just trolling at this point in denying the obvious.

The Galactus shields were used in the heat of the moment he didn't come there to war with Galactus he came there to stop him but since he didn't listen he called all defensive shielding to his side. Your argument is terrible. You assume a prepped Thanos has worse shielding than an unprepped Thanos. That's just silly.

Thanos has enough power to kill those who can't die as Lt has. I mean seriously connect the dots you are better than this special ability illogical part of your debate.

You need to be powerful enough to defeat beings who can't die which both Thanos and Lt have the ability to. It's quite simple.

Do you feel galactus can or can't kill the unkillables here ?

Thanos didn't want to fight Galactus so the first chance he got he was going to try and talk to him. He wasn't defeated so he wasn't oneshotted. Giving up when your point was never to fight anyways isn't the same thing as being oneshotted. Oneshotted means ko'd or killed.

He has three that he used against a more powerful opponent which would survive minutes not seconds meaning he'd be drastically weakened. My arguments make perfect sense. But then again you think Thanos brings better shields when he doesn't plan on fighting than when he does.........

That was a clever way of saying the best forcefield he ever busted through. Wow, I can't believe how far that blew over your head.

The comic states it. I guess you have a problem with marvel now. They meant his form in which he comes back atom by atom so you can't destroy him which makes once again perfect sense.

Drax's powers negated Thanos' so the anti matter bomb could kill a weakened Thanos.

I read about each character I give him the nod over. I stand by my logic which is sound.

Seriously, you're going to use the "Writer made his point clear" when all you do is argue about what the writer makes clear?
Also, Genis stated he's seen Galactus' power before... when he never has.

lol at you twisting things. Is this what you're drawn to do when you have no arguments?
No, I'm saying ALL defensive shields are better than 3 shields. You've been ignoring this for a while. Like, outright, ignoring and then spouting "Oh he was prepped". Prepped means nothing when it's outright stated that all the shields at his disposal were used. And Thanos' prep included poisoning the planet, using his ship to save the heroes, teleporting them away, etc. No where did it stated that prep included arming himself with three amazing shields...
And since it's PERSONAL shields, and it happened BEFORE the Galactus fight. It's nearly impossible to believe that the shields were better. Unless we're assuming that Thanos got rid of personal shields when he knew he would be confronting Galactus. As much as you make it seem so, Thanos is not an idiot. In other words, Thanos downgraded everything after his fight with Omega, and after gaining HOTU... which you love to argue gave Thanos a powerup.

Right, in all honesty, I was going to stop arguing after this since this legitimately stumped me.
Thanos = LT >>> Death
I just needed to connect the dots to see that, since it's so obvious Thanos is above Death and comparable to Living Tribunal, right?

Again, Thanos = LT because he killed a couple beings that couldn't die. Thanos is above Death that gave him his own powers because he clearly overrode her power, as opposed to using her power! Genious!

Why do you think I need to answer your irrelevant questions that spawned during my questions when you won't even straight up answer mine. All of your answers are strong implications, instead of answers, which draws me to the conclusion you think Thanos is comparable to LT, which, I'm giving you the benefit of the doubt that that's not what you mean... but I don't know why that leads me to that conclusion since that's probably exactly what you mean since you're batshit insane.
Plus, I already answered that question anyway. If you had any sort of reading comprehension, you'd have seen that I have already said that Galactus has never killed a being that can't die... and by some form of stupidity, you felt the need to ask the question twice right after I said that. I don't understand the thought process, but I guess I can't understand something that doesn't exist, right?

Except when you throw the first punch. He was one shotted. He gave up. He was prepared to destroy everything... until Galactus hit him. Even
worse than Darkseid when Darkseid asked Superman for a quarter.

ALL>3. I know the math is above you, but with enough practice, you may be able to understand the simple concept.

Nothing blew over my head. You stated it was said on panel that it was 'the Mount Everest of force fields'. I'm asking when this was stated. Way to side step using proof by trying to sway me into something else. Next time you try to sound smart, try to think about what you're talking about.

Again, you can't destroy indestrucible things. That defeats the whole purpose. I don't have a problem with Marvel, I have a problem with less than stellar people not realizing that something's wrong with the thing they treasure most.
Also, way to ignore that getting reduced to a skeleton is the same as getting KO'ed. If Thanos gets reduced to a skeleton, he lost. Simple. He might heal up, but you also will wake up after getting KO'ed. Same thing. Thanos loses.

That makes no sense, and has never been stated on panel ever in any Drax appearance that has ever been published by Marvel. You have a problem with Marvel now?
Drax is his silver bullet, nothing more nothing less. Drax doesn't weaken Thanos... otherwise he wouldn't have been blown to bits by him.

Way to ignore the bulk of my post though. You think you always want to argue, but yet you ignore any sort of proof presented against you. That's not arguing, that's not even debating. That's just being a glutton for punishment. You think answering every post regardless of quality will make you 'win' the debate, when in fact all it does is make you look like you knew nothing about the topic in the first place. Everytime you go into a long debate, you lose... everytime. And people laugh at you while you drag a topic farther and farther away from its goal. Most of the snide remarks made against you that you love to try to argue with are way more informative than any of your fanboy drivel. I hope one day you learn how to use proof, and how to factor things into account instead of outright ignoring it.