KMC Forums - Nam-Ek and Ronan Vs Hulk and Thor

Home » Movies » Movie Discussion » Movie Versus Forum » Nam-Ek and Ronan Vs Hulk and Thor

Nam-Ek and Ronan Vs Hulk and Thor
Started by: danielgamer

Forum Jump:

Pages (9): « First ... « 6 7 [8] 9 »

Last Thread Next Thread

Author

Thread

wallman77
Dark Side

Gender: Male
Location:

quote: (post)
Originally posted by Time Immemorial
Since when is breaking glass a huge destructive force, in any movie? Its just shock value added to make the scene cool. They broke glass ok, Carver threw hissy fits about this because they did it in the matrix. Ok people they broke glass. And?

my friend the glass is a bonus. it shattered the CONCRETE ALL AROUND THEM fFOR YARDS AND EVEN SHOOK THE CARS.

__________________

Aug 20th, 2014 03:41 AM

Click here to Send wallman77 a Private Message

Time Immemorial
Restricted

Gender: Unspecified
Location:

Account Restricted

quote: (post)
Originally posted by carver9
They didn't touch the glass to break it and the distance they are from the building and the shockwaves reaching so far makes it even more impressive.

Glad we have confirmed glass was broken.

Aug 20th, 2014 03:42 AM

Click here to Send Time Immemorial a Private Message

Time Immemorial
Restricted

Gender: Unspecified
Location:

Account Restricted

quote: (post)
Originally posted by wallman77
my friend the glass is a bonus. it shattered the CONCRETE ALL AROUND THEM fFOR YARDS AND EVEN SHOOK THE CARS.

How are you trying to connect this as a superior feat to Namek, Namek tossed a entire train through the air and cratered it, Zod collapsed a sky scraper with just his heat vision. I fail to see relevance as collateral damage is in both movies of people fighting. Marvel shoots movies different then DC, do you want both movies to be the exact same, have the same type of CG and action and fight scenes?

Aug 20th, 2014 03:45 AM

Zack Fair
Fanboy

Gender: Male
Location: Under Satsuki's heel

quote: (post)
Originally posted by carver9
They didn't touch the glass to break it and the distance they are from the building and the shockwaves reaching so far makes it even more impressive.

Yeah. I'm surprised it was never brought up before. I remember mentioning it a few times when the movie was in theaters, but I guess people didn't care/know about it because there was no footage.

__________________

Many thanks to Rao Kal-EL Da Man

Aug 20th, 2014 03:49 AM

Click here to Send Zack Fair a Private Message

Zack Fair
Fanboy

Gender: Male
Location: Under Satsuki's heel

I guess if it doesn't explicitly triumph another feat it doesn't get brought up.

__________________

Many thanks to Rao Kal-EL Da Man

Aug 20th, 2014 03:50 AM

wallman77
Dark Side

Gender: Male
Location:

quote: (post)
Originally posted by Time Immemorial
How are you trying to connect this as a superior feat to Namek, Namek tossed a entire train through the air and cratered it, Zod collapsed a sky scraper with just his heat vision. I fail to see relevance as collateral damage is in both movies of people fighting. Marvel shoots movies different then DC, do you want both movies to be the exact same, have the same type of CG and action and fight scenes?

LOL what are u talking about dude. I remembered something from the movie. I looked it up and found that thor has a great strength feat often over looked. a feat that is comparable to the "god feat" of the great and feared kryptonians. it was merely to show that thor is no slouch in punching power and that he can give off blows comparable and in this case stronger than them since their haymakers didn't destroy the ground they were standing on. that's it. and it has relevance in the thread because we were discussing the helmets and some said thor or hulk cant break it. im putting my two cents in the other jar.

that's it...I dunno what ur talking about. dc and marvel cg and fight scenes lol. u got so ahead of me its not even funny. nam's other feats weren't in question. nor was collateral damage. so I dunno where that came from lol. look im sayin thor has enough strength to bang the big boys(ever nut hugged kryptonians) of KMC. that's it lol

__________________

Last edited by wallman77 on Aug 20th, 2014 at 03:56 AM

Aug 20th, 2014 03:52 AM

wallman77
Dark Side

Gender: Male
Location:

quote: (post)
Originally posted by Zack Fair
I guess if it doesn't explicitly triumph another feat it doesn't get brought up.

you see it

__________________

Aug 20th, 2014 03:53 AM

Zack Fair
Fanboy

Gender: Male
Location: Under Satsuki's heel

Striking power, not punching power.

By the looks of it the hammer did most of the damage.

But yeah I agree. That is why I don't see how people think Namek will solo this.

__________________

Many thanks to Rao Kal-EL Da Man

Aug 20th, 2014 03:54 AM

Time Immemorial
Restricted

Gender: Unspecified
Location:

Account Restricted

quote: (post)
Originally posted by wallman77
LOL what are u talking about dude. I remembered something from the movie. I looked it up and found that thor has a great strength feat often over looked. a feat that is comparable to "god feat" of the great and feared kryptonians. it was merely to show that thor is no slouch in punching power and that he can give off blows comparable and in this case stronger than them. that's it. and it has relevance in the thread because we were discussing the helmets and some said thor or hulk cant break it. im putting my two cents in the other jar.

that's it...I dunno what ur talking about. dc and marvel cg and fight scenes lol. u got so ahead of me its not even funny. nam's other feats weren't in question. nor was collateral damage. so I dunno where that came from lol. look im sayin thor has enough strength to bang the big boys(ever nut hugged kryptonians) of KMC. that's it lol

Fair enough

Aug 20th, 2014 03:54 AM

wallman77
Dark Side

Gender: Male
Location:

quote: (post)
Originally posted by Zack Fair
Striking power, not punching power.

By the looks of it the hammer did most of the damage.

But yeah I agree. That is why I don't see how people think Namek will solo this.

I stand corrected embarrasment

__________________

Aug 20th, 2014 03:58 AM

Time Immemorial
Restricted

Gender: Unspecified
Location:

Account Restricted

quote: (post)
Originally posted by Zack Fair
Striking power, not punching power.

By the looks of it the hammer did most of the damage.

But yeah I agree. That is why I don't see how people think Namek will solo this.

I base on him being able to block things like as Mal did that and follow it with serious damage. Namek was an absolute beast.

Aug 20th, 2014 04:01 AM

wallman77
Dark Side

Gender: Male
Location:

again maybe one on one, but with the hulk, the fight becomes something totally different. and thor will get a few hits in.

__________________

Aug 20th, 2014 04:05 AM

Zack Fair
Fanboy

Gender: Male
Location: Under Satsuki's heel

Ronan is the weak link. Give Namek someone like Abomination or something.

__________________

Many thanks to Rao Kal-EL Da Man

Aug 20th, 2014 04:07 AM

wallman77
Dark Side

Gender: Male
Location:

yup

__________________

Aug 20th, 2014 04:15 AM

Time Immemorial
Restricted

Gender: Unspecified
Location:

Account Restricted

quote: (post)
Originally posted by wallman77
again maybe one on one, but with the hulk, the fight becomes something totally different. and thor will get a few hits in.

Ok but Thor stalemated Hulk while he was supposedly holding back. Namek never held back and took down Clark every time. Though it didn't kill him it was stalemated based on durability.

Aug 20th, 2014 04:17 AM