It's impossible for you to tell me what my experience is about seeing a baseball is false. If you see time slower than you use to then no one can tell you that you are wrong. It's not even a debate. You can clearly just say I don't believe you. Discussion is over.
A 60mph faster was a complete blur to me, a streak of lightning. Now it is like it is floating in the air for a long time. My perception has changed and now I view 60mph much slower than I did when I first encountered them?
This is the truth whether you believe it or not. Also, a science documentary explained that flies see things far slower than humans.
Yes. It was a heat and radiation resistance feat.
Thor got pushed towards the forge when he let go. The net force on him can be calculated as the product of his mass times his acceleration.
It is also impossible for you to say that your perception of time is any better than that of other "normal" humans.
Perhaps you just normally have slower perception than everyone, and when your perception finally sped up you ended up just becoming normal like others. Who knows.
Bottom line is, there's no proof that batters somehow see fast moving objects in slower motion that other people.
An experienced baseball player is not a normal human.
Anyone who relies on peak human reflexes (~ 0.2 second reactions) and perception on a consistent basis is not a normal human.
Normal is defined as the middle 95% (think of the bell curve).
Another example, I took my ex girlfriend to the park years ago. I made her try to hit my fastball (we used the gate as the backstop). She complained that she cant see the ball and that it's too fast. Fast forward to few years later. She has multiple times tagged my fastballs as well as fastballs in the fast batting cages. She says that the ball appears to be slower than what she first saw.
Another example, I trained her on table tennis (yes I'm an experienced player). She could not even see my smashes. They were a complete blur to her. Years later, she blocks the hell out of them with near perfection. I have a hard time beating her and have to rely more on English tricks along with sideline control, instead of setting up smashes.
But all of this is irrelevant. We clearly see Diana following the bullet (in shock) as if time as slowed down.
Quicksilver, Smallville, flash, Spider-Man, etc are all portrayed to see things slower than a normal human does. This is a fictional law.
To say WW does not see bullets any slower than a human is trolling. Not only we have movie evidence but ALL speedsters perceive things that way. Otherwise, they wouldn't be able to respond.
The only reason she couldn't hit your fastball is because she couldn't lift the bat with her paws.
__________________ posted by Badabing
I don't know why some of you are going on about being right and winning. Rob and Impediment were in on this gag because I PMed them. Silent and Rao PMed me and figured I changed the post. I highly doubt anybody thought Quan made the post, but simply played along just for the lulz.
Idiot post. Take a class on statistics. Learn what a normal distribution is. Not normal doesnt mean superhuman, it means in low percentage tail area of the population.
For example, a baby born at 5lb or at 10lb is outside the normal range and therefore considered not a normal birth weight. Superhuman has nothing to do with anything here.
Your brain could always perceive the ball whether you consciously realized it or not. Improving reflexes is a result of improving proprioception. You're able to focus on the ball and not have to think about the movement of your body, this makes the ball look slower.
The only thing you proved with this is that you have no brains to even comprehend what is a joke
I never said emphatically that WW is bulletproof. Stop twisting my words. I am saying that it is hard to say definitely that she was vulnerable since she never got cut onscreen and that there may be a chance she MAY not as vulnerable to piercing as classically due to the sword catch
__________________
Thanks for the sig Scot-and for the help with my avatar
When someone annoys you, it takes 42 muscles to frown but only 4 to reach out and bchslap them upside down on their head
I know it was a joke (an old one at that). What makes you think that I didn't know the boob scan wasn't a joke?
You were suggesting that her being cut resistant holds some evidence towards her being bulletproof. The argument had nothing to do speed and perceptions as Silent trolled about.
__________________ posted by Badabing
I don't know why some of you are going on about being right and winning. Rob and Impediment were in on this gag because I PMed them. Silent and Rao PMed me and figured I changed the post. I highly doubt anybody thought Quan made the post, but simply played along just for the lulz.
KMC Community Forums
Jan 12th, 2019 02:04 AM
