But, You posted nothing to disprove that everything is canon.
On the other hand, We have posted evidence. and We have posted evidences confirming existence of infinite number of dimension.
Which is true?
So, Prove it.
Other than them, JLD confirmed the existence of infinite dimension.
Being realm between living and dead is not exclusive to being higher dimension.
In fact, Rama Kushna confirmed that it is higher dimension than ordinary dimension.
In fact, There are many reference about infinite spatial D below Bleed space.
Imagination and Non-imagination have nothing to do with spatial and temporal.
Realms above Bleed are nothing about temporal or spatial.
So,They don't deny existence of infinite number of spatial and temporal dimensions.
I took Doomsday Clock as one of the evidence of that everything is canon.
And,There are more to prove it.
As long as everything is canon
6D>5D>Sphere of Gods>Bleed>infinite number of spatial and temporal dimensions.
6D and 5D is extra.
They are nothing about spatial or temporal.
It has been confirmed again and again.
Hypertime has always been a thing(even under Snyder, since that's who everyone seems to be fixated on.) So as a whole, the multiverse is indeed infinite.
well you can have infinite dimensions in 6 dimensions. Infinite 3rd dimension for example. The ny52 is its own universe now. Dc is back to being infinite universes.
Not quite. It would technically be seven dimensions, but the space would be six-dimensional since the zeroth dimension doesn't span any space.
And that's assuming that there's proper context for the scene you reference.
The issue here is the same as before. There's not enough context to justify these the "28 dimensions Metatron voyaged through" where spatial dimensions.
Pro tip; if you can replace the word "dimension" with the word "universe" in a sentence, and it isn't contradicted by the context then you can dismiss it as unreliable.
You're using the word "dimension" in two different ways. You're using it to describe a three-dimensional space, which an infinite quantity of can be contained (without reduction) in a six-dimensional space.
But we're talking about infinite-dimensional spaces. And disregarding topology, a space with more dimensions can't be contained in a space of fewer dimensions.
You can biject (please log in to view the image) (i.e. there are as many points in (please log in to view the image) as there are in (please log in to view the image)), but for m > n, a projection of an m-dimensional object to an n-dimensional space would result in a loss of information. For instance, a circle could be a projection of a sphere, but it could also be the projection of an angled cone or cylinder.
Edit. **** ASCII.
Last edited by Astner on Oct 2nd, 2020 at 05:23 PM
Its from Green Lantern 8 if youve any doubt to my reference,
And there are plenty of instances to porve DC has more than 6 dimensions and even infinite dimensions
For example
"Parallel worlds and infinite dimensions". Clearly differentiates Parallel universes from dimensions https://readcomiconline.to/Comic/La...ue-5?id=86580#7
This scan is from Larfleeze run. Mr mind already posted it before but I give you the comics so you can read it by yourself
Wait, So you admitted that dimensions and parallel universes are exchangeable depending on the context. But you completely threw the context out of window when you referring something.
Like you said
But not in this sentence, Which you can't replace the dimensions with universes otherwise it doesnt make any sense
Like I said. When you demanded us to pay attentions to contexts but you just threw the context out of window
By analogy: "world" this word can be used to refer as the earth through most occasions. But it also can be used to refer other things
For example: "The world being suffered from the virus" and "I lost my family, the world is shattered" Both using the same word but not referring the same thing. And even though world refers the earth in most cases, But sometimes it just means other things.
Same case for my example. You keep using other sentences( I.E, Completely irrelevant contexts) to counter this specific sentence.
But this sentence is clearly differentiates "universes" from "dimensions"
Again like you said
So could the word "dimensions" be replaced by "universes" in this particular sentence? Parallel worlds and parallel universes are the same thing. Why did she want to say the same thing twice? This doesn't make much sense, Don't you think?
Last edited by qwertyuiop1998 on Oct 2nd, 2020 at 08:02 PM
Why are you relying on analogies when we have the text we're interpreting in front of us?
Yes it can. Let's read the sentence.
"...across parallell worlds and infinite dimensions--"
Let's exchange the the word dimensions for universes and read it again.
"...across parallell worlds and infinite universes--"
The latter is perfectly coherent.
Even if you consider the former to make more sense to you, that was never part of the condition.
Compare that to the scene when Mr. Mxyzptlk talked about points, lines and time to explain the sixth dimension that was an unambiguous reference to dimensional spaces and not universes. In this instance you can't change the word dimension to universe and get a coherent sentence out of it.
Yeah, The former is makes more sense to me. Because the latter is like saying "I'm travelling across America and united states" Just saying the same thing twice.
Anyway, Mr mind also posted this scan from WF which you admitted it was indeed referring the spatial dimensions https://ibb.co/2t46Vc8
And we knew that WF is canon since all appearances of mxy is the same guy that had been explained in Superman Reborn arc
KMC Community Forums
Oct 2nd, 2020 05:46 AM
