I just gotta ask. Are you stupid? Did you even read the rest of the fight? Or were you so happy over a supposed justification of your Darth Bane fanboyism that you and your sock Exodus sat down together right away at your computer to continue your "master-debating" (say that one fast enough, it'll come to ya"
1. Your posts are too long.
2. Your posts are often wrong.
3. Your quotes (as this one is) are often out of context.
4. You spend entirely too much time typing out huge answers to an entire group of people who think you are a fool.
Life advice: Find a darth bane fan club. Join it. Be happy there. Go ahead, have a party with your new friends to burn the pages of the book after your quote, the ones where Kas'im proves exactly who was toying with who. Bane was lucky to escape that temple with his life. To say he curb-stomped Kas'im is like saying "Luke "curb-stomped" Darth Vader on Bespin for almost 5 seconds!!!" and completely ignoring the fact that Vader owned Luke afterwards.
You claim that the perspective of Luke appearing to use twenty lightsabers at once is subject to hyperbole, but the statement of Bane's blade appearing to be "everywhere at once" isn't?
The rest of the fight isn't the point, Bane lost there becuase he didn't know how to fight someone with two lightsaber's not becuase of Kas'ims speed or skill. And if you read the last line it actually says:
"You should have finished me when you had the chance,"
- indicating that Bane could have finished him before he got out the twin bladesand that during the fight 'The Blademaster became desperate. Leaping, spinning, ducking, rolling: he was wild and reckless in his retreat, seeking now only to escape with his life.'
This is futher supported with: 'The outcome was inevitable. Bane was simply too strong in the Force. Only some unexpected maneuver could save Kas'im, but they had fought too many times in the past for him to surprise Bane now. Over the course of his training Bane had seen every possible sequence, series, move, and trick with the double-bladed lightsaber, and he knew how to counter and nullify them all.' So Bane WAS beating him before then and would have won if he hadn't have fallen for the old Sith flaw of gloating too much
And I don't appreciate being called a 'sock'. What does that actually mean by the way? That I smell? That's pretty lame.
Gideon, we all know you absolutely love to nitpick (see Janus), but if you're going to go out of your way to butt in on a discussion that you're not a part of, to do it, at least do it right.
1. I never denied the fact that Bane's blade appearing to be everywhere at once was subject to hyperbole.
2. I never claimed that absolutely no value could be gauged from such quotes (which is why I'd still bring them up in different arguments).
3. The difference between me and Lightsnake, is that I wasn't the one trying to -- undoubtedly -- place a hyperbolic statement over a factual one (I think you'll notice that the exact quote I was referencing at the time, was that Bane was able to move faster than the eyes of powerful force users to see, which isn't a hyperbolic statement, but a factual one) in terms of the quality they speak for. That was all I was pointing out to Lightsnake - that it was a factor that he wasn't taking into account.
So no, not a single double standard there, I think you'll find; those would be what you go by when you'll act as if Palpatine's lack of recent training with a lightsaber (and by extension, lack of technical prowess with the weapon) doesn't really make too much of a difference to his overall ability, and then support you claim with a bunch of his showings with a lightsaber that were achieved primarily through his force ability, yet when it comes to force demigods such as Nihilus and Sion, you'll treat their lack of prowess (and even then, you'll be relying on absence of proof) as the big be all end all, and ignoring that the latter of the KotOR demigods has Palpatine's best showing beaten by a mile.
Now really Gideon, I can understand the need you appear to possess to constantly try to counter as much of my points as you can (which, like in this thread, usually only equates to a single line per argument), I would quite possibly be like that as well if someone had been dismantling my almost every argument, but you're coming off as a tad bit desperate, and obsessive (call the cops kind of obsessive), and you're losing on the logic front every single time. I'd suggest you put an end to this odd, and quite frankly creepy vendetta you appear to have against me, and stick to what you do best: writing poetry.
As far as everybody on this forum who is in touch with reality is concerned, Escape has wtfpwned every one of your arguments. But you, being the antisocial buffoon that you are, continue to come back after almost 40 bans and still enjoy getting wtfpwned. Sucks to be you man.. It really does.
LOL, "creepy vendetta"? There is no vendetta, Nebaris. Really, do we need to discuss how you got on my account at SD.net and tried to get me banned? What about the last dozen or so of your account usernames being directly related to me? What about the obscenely long posts you've dedicated to me, since Janus, Nai, and myself have had our arguments? Or, what about the continuous returns and the bipolar, spastic rants you dedicate to me?
Lmao. The only one here with an obsession is you. We can all testify to it.