Well we've only seen Raskta when she had Battle Meditation, so we don't know how she is without it, but based off of that fight I think she can beat Kas'im maybe.
Tough call there. The novels set it up so that in theory each are the best the Dark and Lightside have to offer in the way of duelists.
Bane managed to take Kas'im until he switched to dual wielding, after which he only survived because of superior tactics. His dual blade abilities seem to be top notch, and therefore I see no reason to assume that he couldn't deftly handle a single saber as well.
Raskta is said to have claim to the most victories in saber combat of the entire Sith War, so I'd say that speaks to her prowess pretty well. I'd have to say that as she totally dedicated herself to saber prowess at the expense of any other Force-aided techniques that odds are in the end she would have what it takes to best Kas'im.
That said, it would be awesome and then some to see them engage in dual saber combat, though again, I think Lsu takes it.
Nope Kas'im should definitely take this, and Hoth was probably best duelist of the Jedi of those time.
Raskta Lu was only so good because of the battle meditation, kas'im was the best swordsman of the age, and possibly the best ever, and hoth was the greatest the jedi had to offer.
WHOAH! That took it too far! While Drew likes to make his characters appear unrealistically powerful, that doesn't constitute comparing him to that retarded ***** who wrote Twilight. He at least makes a decent storyline and interesting characters, not to mention he told us why there were only ever two Sith at a time.
I've read books by both, I'm able to appreciate (if not share) the depths of their mutual stupidity. Karpyshyn has no merits as a writer that I've seen. The only mildly interesting character I've seen from him was Scourge. Besides, Terry Brooks gave us the reason for the Rule of Two in 1999 with the TPM novel.
Hoth wasn't said to be the best of those time. He might've been great, mind, but we don't really know what his combat specialities even were. Raskta Lu was, on the flip side, noted as having a gigantic load of sith kills, more than anyone else, despite not being very impressive in non-saber areas.
Raskta Lu was not only dueling Bane, Bane after he'd fought Kas'im and gained more experience and while Bane was in orbalisks, but also coverage a weakling at the same time. That's pretty crazy.
In those times though because they were in war the best jedis were usually the most powerful and Hoth was the most famous, most accomplished, the champion of the order, and as Jedis dont really use the force offensively I like to think that he was the best with sabers. Plus in Path of Destruction he cuts through entire groups of sith lords with ease, whereas with Raskta we dont know if she didnt just collect lots of one on one kisll for example.
Lots of Jedi use TK and such. Farfalla was one of the other most famous Jedi Lords at the same time and was much better with his powers than he was with a saber, far outmatched by Raskta Lsu in blade work.
Hoth's biggest celebrations came as a general and leader. Now, I'm sure he's probably fine with sabers, likely better than Farfalla, but Lsu's famous entirely for her combat skills.
And if they were one-on-one kills? They'd have to be a massive number of them to counteract the numbers of people who take on groups, and people like that attracted skilled duelists trying to prove their ability. That's arguably more impressive, though considering she was in the Army of Light it was likely a mix.
Eh I thought Juhani and Jolee were kinda of lame personally. And I guess Missiomn was really likable but she was kind of a pointless and uninteresting character. Bastilla if anythinbg was probably best female characyer and she had awesome voice actress. Revan is cool if only because of tge plot twits and the fact that you wre basically unknowningly playing as the Dark Lord the entire time.
Also KOTOR and especially the second one are superior to Mass Effect imo with much better characters.