Yea. Fisto's good, he can pull anchor duty, and between the two others they'll manage. Likely to take some hard force pushes and bruises, but three masters including one of the better duelists in the order is too much.
Did they say he was above the three masters? Or did they say he's above the three masters combined. I believe Savage is above each master individually. But I don't really think he quite outclasses Kit Fisto, throw in one of the others and he'll be hard pressed, and would probably lose if it's Jar'Kai Fisto. All 3 and it's a rape.
^ After hearing Filoni's quote I stated that the reason Sidious didn't blitz Opress wasn't because Sidious was holding back but simply because Opress was > Tiin + Kolar + Fisto.
But I meant in the context of his performance against Sidious. That it was better than all those 3 together.
As for this thread I can see Opress defeating 2 of them through his sheer power (plus he's shown he can fight 2 Jedi at a time with his Saber staff)..
But 3 is just too many Sabers to defend against for someone of his low level of skill and experience.
Edit- Maul or Obi-Wan however would solo these 3
Last edited by Darth Thor on Feb 15th, 2013 at 04:56 PM
Maul could much easier than Kenobi. Maul has the saber and the TK powers to fend off two of them while smashing another ala TK. It'd be hard for Kenobi to get blows in with 3 opponents.
Yeah. Even Pre Vizsla made Maul work for his victory…
I don’t thinks three Jedi masters of this caliber will fall prey to Maul, much less to Obi-Wan. They have a chance against two of them, but three is just too much.
On topic, Savage goes down.
__________________ Theory is like a box of tools. It must be useful. It must function. And not for itself.
Feb 6th, 2013 10:20 PM
