Is there some reason why his performance against Starkiller is not relevant?Considering it puts him in Jedi killing prowess above Darth Malgus, whose battlefield feats have never been replicated (by Revan or anyone else) and Tulak Hord, who defeated an army of 1,000 Jedi in the Battle of Chabosh, I'd say it does.
Kinda of puts him above Revan as a Jedi killer as well. True dat. Which he'll counter with strength and superior technique.What advantages does Revan's experience afford that Vader lacks?Which let's be honest is his only absolute advantage, but it won't carry him.
The same being true of the reverse, not that that is any guarantee of victory.Right because I wasn't? Malgus fought against the Jedi Order during the Great Galactic War, killing many Jedi, and Tulak Hord defeated 1,000 Jedi during the battle of Chabosh.
They are Jedi killers who Vader is superior to as far as killing Jedi goes, or rather as combatants.
So it stands to reason that he can replicate their cited battlefield/combat related accomplishments. Especially considering Hord's feat is essentially the slaughter of Jedi.No shit lol. Unless you are actually implying she will win.I cringed tbh.
Yes speed does give one an evasive advantage against a slower strength-orientated duelist, but it remains a fact that if they lack the strength advantage, they cannot meet their opponent head on without incurring a disadvantage. That puts them on the defense, and forces them to expend energy evading, while minimising oppurtunities to launch a counterattack.
And if pushed into a tight spot where they cannot evade, they are screwed.Provide some (dated) examples. Your slow cyborg argument doesn't really stack up to his performance against Starkiller, who Vader repeatedly overpowers with his strength, and fails to himself achieve any real advantage with speed.
I haven't seen any proof of Revan's technical mastery at all tbh.
>Calls for a discussion
>Whines when engaged in one
>Gets stomped in the polls
Check again, Vader has his dead to rights twice over, the first time Marek escapes with a cheap shot, and the second time literally bluffs his way out.
Then Witwer comes along and says Vader let him win.Wanna explain why I should first?For reasons you are assuming.Lol, you missed the point, dodging doesn't win battles, it just expends energy and gives ground. Tell me did any of those instances end with Vader losing?Granted.Lol @ this blatant confirmation biased.Which is why I asked for dates, Vader lack of mobility became less and less of a problem as he grew accustomed to his suit, and grew more powerful. Unless its around 0 ABY or later its circumspect.
Well that's a start lol.Inb4 reasons.You mean Aurbere's point that Revan was a warrior? Hardly proves he mastered all seven styles.
It's a good fight (especially with Vader's recent feats), but my main man Revan takes this. Too fast and too smart for Vader. Float like a butterfly, sting like a bee!
Lol if you didn't want to have a debate you shouldn't have responded in the first place. But whining about it midway is just obnoxious.Well those comics aren't stopping any time soon.
True dat. Which he'll counter with strength and superior technique.What advantages does Revan's experience afford that Vader lacks?Which let's be honest is his only absolute advantage, but it won't carry him.
Dec 7th, 2015 09:50 AM
