But no one cared enough to really get involved at all.
Only to mock X2, which I could care less about, though how are we supposed to have a conclusion when we both keep spouting the same thing.
In every argument we've ever had, we always end up in an endless loop.
His arguments rely entirely on assumption.
"He's done this, so he could surely do THIS!"
When most of the time when he mentions "that", the feat he is mentioning is superior to the feat in question.
It would have made sense if he used Ren killing off Jedi Knights as the basis for his argument, but he uses stomping Finn while injured as his basis, when it really isn't all that impressive.
You might want to explain that one in a little more detail, perhaps breaking it down into simple categories? Because as far as I can tell, unless Skywalker can produce rather wide craters with his fists, then he's not doing much to put a dent in Grevious at all. That's not to mention all the other advantages the cyborg is brining into a one-on-one cage fight. You can try his four arms for one, his claws that apparently pierce right through Mandalorion armour. Now you might argue that Anakain is faster than Grevious, but that won't matter much when the General can just restrain his limbs with two of his own, and beat him within an inch of his life with the other two.
Oh, and I do expect you'll engage in it, wouldn't want to hold those stubborn beliefs now considering one's ethos. A simple google search tells me that it's a concession otherwise. At least, that's what happens when you type in "darthant66" followed by "the refusal to debate".
Of course little Anthony, that wasn't the only search result that cropped up either. Here we can find a rather long essay directed towards a fellow redditor, Banethesithari when he refused a debate proposition, because apparantly Anthony might be a little too Bias :
(please log in to view the image)
You haven't changed in four months Darthant, you're the same whiny little chode that you've always been. and will remain so.