Yeah Tulak should easily win, but what if it was a contest of force powers. 2 powerful force masters against an ultimately powersul sith lightsaber duelist.
__________________ I will destroy all of you and take control of the galaxy!!!
Ancient Sith (4000 BBY - 1000 BBY) vs PT Jedi
... Naga Sadow, Tulak Hord, Exar Kun, and Freedon Nadd, but they would also ...
They used Sith Magics as a form of the force. They studied alchemy and the ... www.killermovies.com/forums/archive/index.php/t-359798 - 9k - Cached - Similar pages
[ More results from www.killermovies.com ]
__________________ I will destroy all of you and take control of the galaxy!!!
Gender: Male Location: .::The Anti-Fanboy Confederation::.
Well...I've written this just too often:
The statement about Tulak Hord being the best lightsaber duellist the Sith had is a statement from KotoR times being almost 4,000 years before the OT.
And the weak point in this statement is that it just applies if you compare Tulak Hord to pre KotoR time people and it's only a statement about Sith. So basically there is no way this statement can be applied on Yoda and Sidious since they both are far past KotoR times and Yoda is a Jedi.
We simply don't know how the much the swordfighting changed during the years. If we see that Juyo (form VII) is around in KotoR times but Mace Windu in the PT is the first who mastered it (with Vaapad) you can assume that Mace might be better than Tulak Hord. And now you have Yoda and Dooku who are on par or better than Mace.
Viewing it this way, Yoda alone might be too much for Tulak in a lightsaber fight, throwing in Sidious will most likely overpower Tulak.
__________________
"Dear God, what is it like in your funny little brains?"
It kinda makes sense but vaapad was based off of juyo, then he mastered it. But tulak could take them in a lightsaber duel, I think atleast. But if it were force powers, it might be different, and everyone is entitled to their own opinion. That's why I make these threads, to see what others think.
__________________ I will destroy all of you and take control of the galaxy!!!
Gender: Male Location: .::The Anti-Fanboy Confederation::.
I don't judge Revans swordfighting ability because I don't know anything about it. Since I already argued that Yoda might take Revan in a lightsaber duel and I have argued that Dooku / Mace might be able to take Malak I - at least - don't think that Revan is far superior to Yoda, Dooku or Mace when it comes to lightsaber duels.
__________________
"Dear God, what is it like in your funny little brains?"
Well, the issue is that Kreia's statement to the effect of the Ancient Sith make it seem like the KotOR era individuals are children playing with toys would apply to Revan. So by this, we can assume, provided Kreia is a reputable source, that Tulak is superior to Revan in terms of swordfighting/lightsaber wielding. Now, if you want to assume Mace has more developed swordsmanship than Tulak, then logic dictates he would also be superior to Revan.
However, the primarily fallacy of this argument is that as lightsaber techniques get developed, that they are necessarily superior. You have to assume, that with the movement towards blasters and away from lightsabers (just as how Makashi is becoming less prolific) that just as much is lost as is gained.
It would effectively be trying to compare an army veteran to an Ancient Spartan in swordsmanship, the emphasis is not on waving a sharp, pointy gladius anymore.
KMC Community Forums
Aug 30th, 2005 07:45 PM
