Arkham Origins wasn't bad... It just didn't completely reinvent the wheel like the others, and not all games necessarily need to do that to be worthwhile. If you're mentioning it here because of its early release bugs, then see Assassin's Creed Unity and list that too.
It wasn't that bad, but it pales in comparison to Asylum and City. I just didn't a enjoy it that much, and like Smasadian said, it didn't add much to the overall lore of the Arkham games. Some things I liked (or even loved) about Origins, though, was Troy's Joker and Harley's/Joker's first meeting. The latter was particularly incredible, in my opinion.
The gameplay was better, yeah, but the story was boring to me.
If we're talking really bad games, pretty much any third party NES game that didn't have the seal of approval (Think Bible Games.)
__________________ What CDTM believes;
Never let anyone else define you. Don't be a jerk just to be a jerk, but if you are expressing your true inner feelings and beliefs, or at least trying to express that inner child, and everyone gets pissed off about it, never NEVER apologize for it. Let them think what they want, let them define you in their narrow little minds while they suppress every last piece of them just to keep a friend that never liked them for themselves in the first place.
Registered: Jun 2008
Location: In Luna's mane, chasing STAAARS!
Why you gotta hate on Arkham Origins? If any game shouldn't exist for being a rehash, it's Battlefield: Hardline. Origins at least had a ton of new stuff to make up for the AC layout. Hardline just has cops and robbers in maps similar to Battlefield 4's.
Apr 30th, 2015 04:52 PM
Thanks Scribble!
