With YouTube, Facebook, Twitter, you-name-it, etc banning/censoring conservative talking-heads left and right, is it time for legislation that would prohibit these moves?
What exactly is "hate-speech"? Anything that can be interpreted as being hostile towards another group of people? Give me a break.
No, it just takes a sane stance on those to hide behind "muh free speech" to be horrible people Fly.
You want to say something boring, or irrelevant, or malicious? Claim someone is trying to ban you from saying it. It's how these vacuous Youtube followers are manipulated.
__________________
Last edited by Putinbot1 on Jun 23rd, 2019 at 12:46 PM
The problem is your definition of a "sane" stance.
__________________ Chicken Boo, what's the matter with you? You don't act like the other chickens do. You wear a disguise to look like human guys, but you're not a man you're a Chicken Boo.
So the far-lefts stance is that people shouldn't have their rights protected?
__________________ posted by Badabing
I don't know why some of you are going on about being right and winning. Rob and Impediment were in on this gag because I PMed them. Silent and Rao PMed me and figured I changed the post. I highly doubt anybody thought Quan made the post, but simply played along just for the lulz.
Mmmyeah , pretty much. Just look at how Google/Youtube hides behind their shenanigans like wiith the Crowder stuff. They tell him He hasn't Broke Any Rules... but they punihsed him cause they don't like how he thinks....
Leftism is Fascism.
The Same kind of thing happens here on the microcosm that is KMC all the time.
And now FacsistBook is going to start pulling THIS SHIT!
I'd rather see a bill of rights which involves government not interfering in a private website's right to manage it's own content. not that it's needed
__________________
Your Lord knows very well what is in your heart. Your soul suffices this day as a reckoner against you. I need no witnesses. You do not listen to your soul, but listen instead to your anger and your rage.
Gender: Male Location: The Proud Nation of Kekistan
I would like to see some legislation that holds them accountable to defining and being clear about what their own rules are.
__________________
Shadilay my brothers and sisters. With any luck we will throw off the shackles of normie oppression. We have nothing to lose but our chains! Praise Kek!
THE MOTTO IS "IN KEK WE TRUST"
Just to be clear, you're perfectly fine with a few corporations controlling what is rapidly becoming the new public square? With them being able to behave like a publisher, claim first amendment rights, while also enjoying the immunity granted to them due to their "platform" status?
__________________ Chicken Boo, what's the matter with you? You don't act like the other chickens do. You wear a disguise to look like human guys, but you're not a man you're a Chicken Boo.
It’s not a public square though it’s private. Yes yes, the ruling about Trump whatever. I’ve already claimed I disagree with it and believe the ruling was wrong.
They're rapidly becoming that whether we like it or not. And you can disagree with the ruling, but the precedent has now been set. Regulation is needed.
They did this to themselves. And all over Trump Derangement Syndrome.
__________________ Chicken Boo, what's the matter with you? You don't act like the other chickens do. You wear a disguise to look like human guys, but you're not a man you're a Chicken Boo.
KMC Community Forums
Jun 23rd, 2019 03:39 AM
