Of course we'll be waiting forever, I gave a psychoanalysis, which by its very nature is impossible to prove. So.... good job stating the obvious there.
And which time are you speaking of? The Exile debate, becuase Faunus actually said I won that and I don't recall anyone else saying anything about it, so yeah.....
Actually, look back at what Faunus said there, and that was the closest thing to anyone saying that you had an argument. That's what makes this easy for me.
And psychoanalyses aren't hard to prove, neither are assertions and accusations, if they're legitimate. In your case they aren't.
I have lost more debates on this forum than I've won, but I haven't lost in a while, particularly because Gideon and Faunus are gone. If you'd like to post what points I "Lost" with LS in regards to the current debate, I'd love to answer them. I have a feeling though, that you won't because there aren't any.
Man, it was good to read that thread again. I was really on top form. But anyway, all I could find on the topic in question is this- 'Again, while I agree with parts of your broader argument', which is Faunus agreeing with Allankles, which as you were so fond of saying was basically my (and his, credit given) argument repeated over and over again. I also distinctly remember that I asked him to give his opinion on the argument over on ROK. Eventually he said that I had won (mostly becuase you wimped out (again)). So There. (plus it was totally worth the effort, just to re-read me owning you, giving you plenty of opportunities to present your own argument and then you not delivering (in da bedroom)).
And Psychoanalysis actually can't be proven- 'First, critics contend that Freud's theory is lacking in empirical evidence and relies too heavily on therapeutic achievements, whereas others assert that even Freud's clinical data are flawed, inaccurate, and selective at best. Second, the actual method or techniques involved in psychoanalysis, such as Freud's ideas on the interpretation of dreams and the role of free association, have been criticized. Finally, some critics assert that psychoanalysis is simply not a science and many of the principles upon which it is based are inaccurate.'- Kristen M. Beystehner. Somewhere in there it should say that it lacks empirical evidence
And you're basically saying that you've stopped losing now that no-one is really debating anymore. Great.
Edit: Yaay!
Edit2: though honestly, Drakengard has awful gameplay, but its hilarious to see how messed up it is. I mean, what other game lets you kill child-soldiers while they beg you to stop?
__________________
Last edited by Nephthys on Dec 16th, 2009 at 04:19 PM
In response to the Drakengard thing. You should play Sands of Destruction when it comes out; its apparently an amalgamation of Xenogears, Xenosaga, Chrono Trigger, Final Fantasy VII, Grandia, Etrian Odyssey and Drakengard, and developed by some of the best developers ever (the legendary Masato Kato and Yasunori Mitsuda).
I do play them but I'm not too big a fan of them lol. The truth is I'm not too big a fan of gameplay in general, a game really needs a storyline for me to stay interested, otherwise I get bored pretty quickly. All three by the way lol.
Actually, Faunus even admitted to not having read the argument and just to piss me off, and the fact that many of you have admitted that ALlankles is incompetent, coupled with you having his exact argument, means you got owned. But thanks for a trip down memory(reality) lane
No, I stopped losing because the only ones left to debate are you and LS, and I've never lost an argument to you.
However, I'm going to motivate you. Since you are always incapable of, and known for not backing your assertions up(not as much as RH though), I will give you $2 for every point you find that you claimed I lost against LS, and the same will apply to your Exile argument. Call it motivation to help you learn how to debate properly instead of throwing things out there. I'm confident you'll find nothing in LS's argument and even less in your owned Exile argument, I'll be happy to cough up the $$$ if I'm wrong.
Unless you're going to tell that THAT had nothing to do with LS? And if it didn't, then please go ahead and prove where I run away from arguments and where I am losing, I'll wait.
Don't be daft, it's called paypal and I'm only offering it because money usually pushes people to do something.
Oh no I understand everything you say, its just that your retardedly wrong, as I and Allankles have shown. And every time we ask you to argue back, you pussy out.
you-
Except there were and I am.
You and allankles have shown nothing besides identical, flawed arguments. When I wash my ass with him, you come in, and vice versa. Both of you wait for the other one, it's cute.
me-
you-
me-
you-
me-
you-
me-
You'll begin to notice a pattern here, with me constantly trying to get you to actually debate like a member of this forum should and then you insulting me and backing off
(incidentally, most of these are also arguments for the Exile to which you've never given a satisfactory response beyou 'lolz LOVE!', so yeah, gimme my money.
This was more confusing than the LSAT. Why don't you just link me to the original thread, or use quotes for the both of us, like I did in the argument with LS. Furthermore, you attribute "running away", or posting pictures as a sign of defeat, when I can attribute it to making my point and the other party has nothing legitimate to add, so I amuse myself.
ALlankles' argument has been proven wrong each time by me and other members of this forum. Your argument resembled his almost verbatim. There wasn't a single shred of evidence in that argument that you were right, ANYWHERE. However, if you REALLY want to debate it again, repost the thread and we'll start from scratch.
No it's not. If that was the case, you, Allankles, LS, or most notoriously, Nebaris, can keep on typing even though you know you're wrong or don't want to admit it, and hope the other guy just gives up so you don't look like a douche.
No one posts there anymore, so:
User Name: Nemesis
Password: Password1
(Case sensitive. Marvel at my winage.) ((Dnt look @ the me/gid thing, since that was just painful on both sides. [i still won that tho- faunus saiz so]))
Dec 16th, 2009 03:24 PM
