Which Ancient Sith Lord would you like to be reintroduced in the new canon?
I would personally like to see Freedon Nadd back in, he looks like he could mesh into the new canon Sith pretty well.
__________________ "Vader's pulse and breathing were machine-regulated, so they could not quicken; but something in his chest became more electric around his meetings with the Emperor; he could not say how. A feeling of fullness, of power, of dark and demon mastery -- of secret lusts, unrestrained passion, wild submission -- all these things were in Vader's heart as he neared his Emperor. These things and more."
__________________ "Happiness is a lie. Life is horror. The light is always dying all across the universe. The last star will flicker out someday, when it does, all that remains is shadow. And I will be its king!"'-Amahl Farouk
Re: Which Ancient Sith Lord would you like to be reintroduced in the new canon?
I second this. Or Ragnos.
__________________ There's a man goin' 'round takin' names.
An' he decides who to free and who to blame.
Everybody won't be treated all the same.
There'll be a golden ladder reaching down.
When the man comes around.
As much as I hate the whole "Canon vs. Legends" thing, I have to admit I agree with this. One thing I did like about TCW was Bane's new look. I found it far more impressive than his comic/novel counterpart.
Exar Kun is the only ancient sith interesting enough to exist in the pure, master race new canon.
Let the rest burn.
__________________
"The Daemon lied with every breath. It could not help itself but to deceive and dismay, to riddle and ruin. The more we conversed, the closer I drew to one singularly ineluctable fact: I would gain no wisdom here."
As long as they completely change, well, pretty much everything about him I agree. Karpyshyn's Bane was an absolute travesty (he was cool in the comic though). Also he should be the first "Darth".
"The Daemon lied with every breath. It could not help itself but to deceive and dismay, to riddle and ruin. The more we conversed, the closer I drew to one singularly ineluctable fact: I would gain no wisdom here."
Registered: Oct 2014
Location: France/Rezée (near Nantes)
Exar Kun and Darth Revan our old Darth Revan just before 3.0.
Tulak hord with a fresh reboot of his biography....
AJunta pall....
Marka Ragnos.
Our bad ass mother ****er Malgus.
Hmm, interesting topic. Both Kun and Nadd would be great to explore in canon. Ragnos as an obscure, ancient Sith would be good to. As to Bane, better leave him as a ghost that can be easily dismissed imho.
Last edited by Stigma on Mar 17th, 2015 at 09:06 AM
See, Exar always struck me as too straight-forward and not too interesting. He was an angry Jedi who became a sith.
Now, Ulic, he was the sith at the time with an interesting character arc. He was the one who was a legitimately good guy who fell, felt despair when he killed his brother, tried to redeem himself... where Exar was straightforward and was always in the same direction, Ulic grew and changed.
As for Freedon, he's a guy with barely any characterization. I'll admit to not getting his appeal either, not when there's a lot of more developed ancient lords. Ajunta is interesting. Heck, even Sadow- though I do hope they completely ditch the silly 'sorcery to blow up stars' stuff.
I prefer Ulic as a character. Exar, though, makes a far better and more intimidating villain.
Nah, as the creator of the RoT and the only survivor of those ancient Sith, Bane should be a bad ass. I hope they make him powerful and interesting in the new canon unlike what they did in the EU. Basically, he should be an entirely different character from his EU counterpart with the only similarities being that he is a sith named Darth Bane and that he created the RoT.