Exactly. And yes, you can see by his expressions Palpy enjoys his evil nature. He's not out for a moral good, he's out for his personal gain and will kill, manipulate, destroy etc. anyone or anything to get it. heck, he even clones people.
palpatine is nothing more than a comical bad guy.
the evil villain who twirls his handlebar moustache while waiting
for the train to run over the damnsel that he tied to the tracks.
he laughs sinisterly simply because he knows what he is doing is
completely wrong and evil, and that is precisely why he's doing it.
...so you cannot debate this by comparing this fictional depiction of evil using
actual real-world concepts of evil, because its already been defined
by george lucas as just what i described. his very nature is to consume,
kill, and destroy everything in his path, simply for the joy of the
destruction and suffering he causes. same goes for palpatine
__________________
"Sell crazy someplace else. We're all stocked up here."
Last edited by Schecter on Apr 11th, 2007 at 03:52 PM
its probably the most widely debated philosophical topic.
its just that in cases like this george lucas plays the role of 'dictator of reality'
when debating star wars, so his word is final.
__________________
"Sell crazy someplace else. We're all stocked up here."
Last edited by Schecter on Apr 11th, 2007 at 04:05 PM
well light and darkside darkside has hate in it which is abit evil but lightside has people talking about not feeling for others which is also abit evil in my opinion
gg is right this might go somewhere hopefully before flame wars about opinions start seems lights got sum dark aspects and sarks got sum light aspects about em
And Lucas's statement was concerning Anakin. He very clearly chose the spectrum of good (i.e. Jedi) and evil (i.e. Sith) for Anakin to chose between. Palpy was plain evil and used Anakin's obsessions for his own gain.
KMC Community Forums
Apr 11th, 2007 01:50 PM
