quote: (post)

Originally posted by Newjak
Correction "Some wealth and income inequality" is acceptable.

Too much has horrendous effects on the people and economy

quote: (post)

Originally posted by Klaw
Who has the right to decide how much is too much, and what right do they have to do anything about it?

quote: (post)

Originally posted by Newjak
People do and they have a right not to be broken by a system that puts them into high levels of poverty at the expense of keeping a handful of "smart hardworking" people living like royalty.

quote: (post)

Originally posted by Newjak
Correction "Some wealth and income inequality" is acceptable.

Too much has horrendous effects on the people and economy

quote: (post)

Originally posted by Klaw
What people?

Give a specific example.

quote: (post)

Originally posted by Robtard
^ Bingo

eg Pieces of shit like Jeff Bezos and other billionaires profiting the most during a pandemic: U.S. Billionaires Gained $1 Trillion Since The Pandemic Started

quote: (post)

Originally posted by Newjak
See Robtard below

quote: (post)

Originally posted by Klaw
That doesn't answer my question.

quote: (post)

Originally posted by Newjak
I'm not sure what specifics people are you talking about.

I also don't really care which people you want to be honest. Seeing your responses so far doesn't lead me to believe to will care what I say anyways.

All I will say is large amounts of income inequality like what we're seeing in the U.S. needs to be curbed by someone otherwise America is going to collapse.

quote: (post)

Originally posted by Klaw


What gives them the right to take peoples' money and redistribute it?

quote: (post)

Originally posted by Robtard
Should also be noted that it wasn't just them profiting that much during a pandemic, the middle and lower class lost tremendous amounts of wealth.


Klaw likes to play defensive shield to these bastards and the system that supports the inequality, like a useful dummy. Cos I don't think he's the top .1%

quote: (post)

Originally posted by gold slorg
sure it's fair and just - but not really good in the long term if critical point is being reached

i mean if you don't like communism & shit like that, then redistribution and reasonable taxation are the only way to prevent them lol

if you have insane inequalities, the lower class people will in the end be like 'hey there are millions of us and only dozens of them, let's kill them and take their wealth' and boom you have red revolution and another Lenin shit again

redistribution, taxation, and welfare politics weren't even created by the leftists lol, they were created by capitalists that realized that for capitalism to survive, you can't allow for social pressures to reach the critical point where the lower class are just like 'this whole thing sucks, let's kill the 1%'

quote: (post)

Originally posted by Robtard
He never said he was for that, the issue is with the system that allows such levels of inequality, while protecting the richest people and corporations.

quote: (post)

Originally posted by Robtard
He never said he was for that, the issue is with the system that allows such levels of inequality, while protecting the richest people and corporations.