No he doesn't. He uses special effects because they are needed, like a majority of sci-fi flicks. Can you recall a sci-fi flick without special effects?
I would have to agree with you their , i usually bypass all the crap about love peace ect , just to see the giant monsters kicking the shit out of each other.
I have mixed feelings about the film , i personally thought the film was good , but the acting weak . With padme having little to no emotion and anakin whining . Although part of the actors problems was the stupid script which fell in on itself halfway through the film.
I seriously dint understand why everyone hates hell-boy , i thought it to be a pretty decent film , xxx on the other-hand was a stinker . A weak action flick just to promote Vin Diesel's career .
1. The last horror movie
2. saw
3. catwoman
4. The last ride
5. scary movie 3
6. Doom
7. The Ring 2
8. When Sante conqured mars (don't know i conqured is spelled right but the movie sucked
9. The Village
10. Enough
This movies are not in order
__________________ outside im only a big beautiful butterfly but inside me there's a little ugly maggot who just wanna come out..
The king may control the man, but the man controls hes soul
Same recycled plot- A bunch of kids in the middle of nowhere, giant animal/dinosaur/etc kills them one by one, a guy and a girl are left in the end, they make out, THE END.
The acting- Oh god... Who the hell finds these guys? Do they actually refer to them while shooting as "The Talent?"
Gender: Unspecified Location: With Cinderella and the 9 Dwarves
What is a Sci-Fi original movie...actually it seems like more like Horror movies you are talking aboot..Sci Fi movies are, well, science fiction, are they not?
"Meet the Fockers" was hilarious, and you'd have to be married/engaged to really get the jist of it. "Mean Girls" is the new age "Heathers", and a great social commentary.
"Coffee and Cigarettes" isn't really a "movie, perse. I wouldn't count it.
"xXx" was a pretty engaging action flick with a great soundtrack.
"Napoleon Dynamite" was intentional stupid. Pure genius, IMO.
"Freddy vs Jason" wasn't supposed to be scary. Both franchises have been campy for years now.
"Fantasic 4" was a well rounded comic book movie without pretention. That's a rarity. PLUS it was entertaining, and hip.
"Fletch" owns, and the new TCM wasn't necessary, but it wasn't too horrible of a remake. It's more graphic, and detail oriented.
What did you expect from a first time filmmaker on a limited budget? It's a cult classic now.
Come on. "Underworld" was well written, very modern and engaging, and wasn't hokey like so many other werewolf movies out there, save "Ginger Snaps". That was a VERY cool movie, visually, and storyline wise.
"Santa Claus Conquers The Martians". It was a old B movie, of course it sucked.
"The Village" will never get its due. It's a period piece for all anyone knows, and the twist at the end is entirely unpredictible. Besides that, it speaks volumes about utopian society and its flaws.
Monty Python's Jabberwocky was the absolute worst movie I've ever
seen. It was literally a bloody mess - no plot, gross humor with blood strewn about the scenes like rain, enough to make you puke. I enjoyed the improvisation of "Holy Grail", and I understand that British humor is more tolerant of physical and cruel gags, but I think Jabberwocky just
went too far.
The stupidest movies I've seen (and I like good horror flicks) were
"They" and "Jeepers Creepers". By the way, I liked "Jeepers Creepers 2"
because the good guys win, and clearly, there was a plot, a history of
the animal, and some rationale behind the re-appearance of the beast.
"They" was senseless. It was a simple attempt to make you curious as to what the heroine was fighting, and when you finally generate some curiousity, the woman is captured by "They", whatever they are, and the movie ends. That makes for a dull movie - you want your money back.
Jeepers Creepers was almost as senseless as "They". It gets a better rating because
1) It showed the entire creature early enough in the movie to make you care to find out what it was
2) The film quality was decent enough to see what's going on.
Jeepers Creepers fails because it doesn't reveal what the kids are fighting. Most viewers don't like being baited, and won't pay for a second movie if they don't like the first movie. When I buy DVDs, I like to have the original and all sequels of a movie, but if the original movie
is bad, I won't buy it.
The movie that made me feel like I was robbed at gunpoint of my movie money was "The Village". It was advertised as a horror flick,
and turned out to be the sorriest hoax of all times. It was senseless.
With jets in the sky, helicopters, private planes, public surveillance,
no area of a state within walking distance of civilization in the U.S. can
go unnoticed or uninvaded for enough time for children to become
young adults. A hopelessly fake piece of fiction. When you promise your
audience horror, give them horror.
I nominate Boy's in the Hood (Hah i mock your shitty spelling style)
This film is the most putrid and laughable effort ever.
All it was , was a outing of black guy's running around , swearing every second or so (How many times were the words ***** and **** used ? ) trying to pick up girls and shooting at each other with the occasional drug deal thrown in.
In fact the judges were more then likely on crack to even nominate this film.
Shitty shitty waste of space if i ever see this film of my television set again i will throw the damn box out of my window.....
It's an image worth pondering for a moment. Maybe, when you cut past the instrumental and songwriting virtuosity, the funny voices and characters, what is left is a man alone in his recording studio for days at a time.
KMC Community Forums
Nov 2nd, 2005 06:11 AM
Worst movies of all time
