You make a valid point who, but some people just need to be told that they are useless trash. I don't support needless suicide, but every once in awhile, there's a human being out there who would do the world a great favor by succumbing to that act. Hopefully Knightfall will be one of these statistics. Or we can just have Paola kick his ass out of here, either way.
I understand your feelings of frustration, you fail to defeat me intellectually so you must resort to petty insults and wishing death upon me. You certainly aren't the first to have done so and you most assuredly won't be the last, yet...I am still here. I urge you to continue your insult war, as I said, it feeds me. The more you post, the more I post, the angrier you get, the more satisfied I feel...no matter what you do; I win.
u guys are crazy. some people really hate batman, i dont know why there all jumping to spideys defence. joker is one of the most evil villains ever created, fact is gg doesnt come close in terms of being evil.
gg blew up half of new york, wow, what an original idea
when it comes down to its bats and joker are human, gg and spidey arent, to an extent, joker doesnt have a glider or pumpkin bombs, just his wits and some henchmen, and he still caused so much trouble. yeah goblin is evil, but nowhere near the jokers level.
joker is evil to batmans extent, kind of like kingpin is evil to dd's extent...but spidey and gg are much larger in scope therefore have much more of a greater sense of good and evil
i dont hate batman, i just think some dont read much of spiderman and some people are all hearts and roses about batman being "human" and the "pinnacle of the human race" but people never bother to understand more than whats being told to them, sure spiderman is a completely fictional character, but his problems are much more down to earth than batman's would ever be imo
why am i going to spidey's defense? because people consider batman "complex" and then speak of spidey as simply black and white
__________________
Last edited by Havoc470 on Nov 16th, 2004 at 07:50 PM
yeah, Spidey is definately more relatable than Bats ever will be. I'm sorry, but Spidey has more human qualities that we can all share. Love, Compassion, mercy, anger, vengence, Hate, being broke, being a college student, trying to hold a job that doesn't pay enough to get by. Being busy 24/7, trying to please everyone around you when you go through hard times, enjoying the simple things in life, being silly for the heck of it and loving being alive despite your blessings and curses.
These types of things Spidey expresses much more than bats could. Bats is pretty much one sided. He's dark, and he gets the job done. He's human and needs what all humans need, but he has been shaped closer to a onedimensional character. One that I love.
Maybe if you have been to war or had ur parents killed in front of you, or somn similar then you can feel like bats does, but wait, how many of us are multi billionares and can do what ever we want when we want?..............oh yeah, George Bush.
__________________
Last edited by Spiderninja008 on Nov 16th, 2004 at 08:18 PM
Young one, you cannot defeat someone intellectually if it's not an intellectual fight. You have shown no intellect whatsoever, and YOU are the one who resorted to wishing death by that stove remark. You also began the insults several pages back to everyone else. And I'm not angry, not at all. I don't get angry over a message board, lol, that's absurd. I get angry at people who have an effect on my life, you do not. This is a Batman vs. Spider-Man thread, it hardly holds importance in the grand scheme of things. Think what you like, I really couldn't care less.
i know alot of people who dont have parents, and one or two that have lost their parents at a young age (either by car accident or mugging), why would a ruthless killer shoot two adults and take their money while leaving the amazingly rich kid alone to come back and completely kick his ass? no freakin clue
either way my friends arent like that at all, 1) because they dont have billions of dollars, 2) because real life isnt like that at all
Lol, you're so angry Wrath. You are obsessed with this thread and you have to keep posting responses. Clearly I've gotten under your skin. And all this over a simple message board post, man you are easy to annoy. Just admit that I won the argument and let it go.
Batman virtually has to beat Spider-Man to a pulp to get Spider-Man's attention, Spider-Man on the other hand has to knock Batman out with one punch and then swing home. That is the more likely scenario
Well if it is the one punch the spiderman is brining to the fight then he should turn and go back home to Aunt May before something really bad happens to him.
Batman beating spiderman to a bloody pulp to get his attention. Well slow down in-front of the batman and you lose.
This quote was not mean to be cool "You do not need to beat someone to a bloody pulp before you know that you have done a number on them." NOT MEANT TO BE COOL . In lames terms I do not need to kick you ass to pulp before I know that you have had enough. SORRY IF YOU FOUND THIS COOL but it is ok if you found it to be wrath.
Everybody knows that, even six graders to kindergarden. What is your point? And let me tell you something your spiderman is not immune to yourGood guys win 9 times out of 10. The writer's going to find a way to let spiderman win, whether it makes any sense whatsoever or not I changed batman to spiderman.
Wrathofachillies, this is a question you asked knightfall, now I am asking it to you. "What color is the sky in your world"?
Now powers, no problem Because batman is going to find his way around that dusie. The only thing that gives batman trouble is going to be the spider sense Because it is unique. Never the less we have seen batman adapt to his opponent before the person could say thank goodness for super powers. And people I'm I lying
Last edited by lifeisaglich on Nov 17th, 2004 at 12:05 AM
I've said it before and I'll say it again, BATMAN will WIN.
The BIGGEST argument used against Batman's victory is the fact that he has no superpowers. True.BUT, Batman has literally transformed his body into a weapon.Not to mention the fact that he DAMN knows how to use it. Sure Sipderman may be '100 times more faster, more agile', but what is all that worth if he doesn't know how to use himself to his full extend. Batman can find 100 times more creative ways to use his bare hands lethaly against his enemy while Spiderman doesn't even know the basics of using his very human body. How? I ask, how do you expect Spiderman to defeat Batman with his newly aquiared strange, spider sense and agility, which he himself is just learning to get a grip on ?He can't even defend himself in an ordinary, humanly manner, HOW will he do so successfully in an inhuman, extraordinary manner?This creates a MAJOR problem for Spiderman because here he is standing in front of a man who knows thousands of ways to use hi sordinary,human body lethaly when Spidey doesn't have a full grip on his human skills,nor his 'oh so great' superpowers.
It's not what you have it's how you use it.
Last edited by Punkyhermy on Nov 17th, 2004 at 12:20 AM
first of all i still believe spidey wins, as for the gg v joker argument, this is my opinion
u think just cos someone is more powerful it makes them more evil and have a better understanding of what it means to be evil? thats untrue imo.
i personally have read tons of comics bout bats and spidey. petey has more human problems sure, in his own way. but relating to a character is a purley personal thing, look at my sig ffs. do i relate to bats or spidey more? bats, not because i'm rich (which i'm not) or had my parents killed(which io didnt, but because i dont have an aunt may, i don't have a loving family or shit like that. i am and always will be a loner, if bruce is complex, then so am i. he made a conscious decision to go out and protect people, he doesnt have a mary jane to look after and worry about or save in every comic, bats saves strangers. probably people he'll never see again. i'm sure to the majority petey is more relatable, but not to me. thats just my opinion.
What the hell are you talking about? You aren't even making any sense. Nothing bad is going to happen to Spider-Man. Batman hasn't the ability to take him down without some serious weaponry, plain and simple. He is a decent martial artist, nothing better. Spider-Man has fought martial artists much superior to Batman and dodged every blow. You don't know anything about Spider-Man obviously.
The writer often finds reasons to make a particular character win whether it makes sense or not. That would be the scenario if Batman won, much like it was when he fights Superman. He doesn't 'beat' Superman, he holds out kryptonite and that counts as a fight. No. It doesn't. I won't bother responding to the 'Batman adapts' absurdity. He cannot adapt to someone who knows his every move before Batman even knows. If he finds some sort of knock-out gas, then things are more evenly matched, but he still doesn't have the fighting ability to knock out Spider-Man. Period.
You've used this argument before. You've proven in debates past that you know nothing of characters other than Batman. Case in point: you know nothing of Spider-Man, thus you don't get to have an opinion. Spider-Man knows how to use himself to his full extent just as easily as Batman does. His full extent greatly surpasses Batman's as well. Where do you get his 'newly acquired anything?' Spider-Man has been around for 40 years! He has been fighting in the comic world for more than a decade, what is wrong with you? Go look up certain information before you enter into a discussion in which you have such limited knowledge. I can't stand people who think 'their' hero is undefeatable and other heroes don't know how what they're doing. It doesn't work that way sweetheart.
KMC Community Forums
Nov 16th, 2004 03:54 AM
. 
. In lames terms I do not need to kick you ass to pulp before I know that you have had enough. SORRY IF YOU FOUND THIS COOL but it is ok if you found it to be wrath.
