It was originally planned to have T4. They had the basic story written at the same time as T3. However nothing concrete has been set which is why its not in the list =)
I havent been able to find much. I came across a snippet that told how it was based after the ending of T3 and [SPOILER - highlight to read]: It take place completely after judgement day. It follows John Conner from the beggining showing how he came to be leader of the reistance.
Supposedly on the basic premise was fleshed out. They have not written a script or anything for it yet.
Yep! The first two may not have been that good but this one and the fourth one should be great! Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban and Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire! Though I do like the books better the movies.... But the books mature as Harry gets older.... so than movies should too!
__________________ When you walk away...
You don't hear me say...
Please, oh baby, don't go...
Simple and clean is the way that your making me feel, tonight...
Yea there arew a lot of unnesscesary sequels. Some of them will definately be good, but others will probably suck. But there are just way too many.
About T4, I think it was written already, and now they are working out the rights to everything (that is confirmed). However, now that Arnold is governator, I don't think T4 will be made. Let me get back to you guys on that.
[COLOR=limegreen]There's nothign wrong w/ sequels, true they are becoming quite profuse lately, but that does not mean that there is a lack of originality. Hollywood finds that people enjoyed a certain movie, so they milk it for all it's worth. It's just the way the system works. And while most sequels are absolute crap (i.e. Batman movies, Tomb Raider, 2Fast2Furious, Harry Potter, and many many more), You do get the occaisional gem (X-Men, LotR, Matrix)
What I'm saying is, sequels are not a bad thing. Sequels expand upon world that we come to know and love (wit
Sequels should only be released if they actually ARE part of a trilogy, ie LOTR, Harry Potter etc. Geez thats one crazy list of upcoming sequels back there, im not sure half are really necessary, cant they think of something new instead? New characters, new story etc.. something different. And The Matrix was originally a trilogy, cheap excuse i reckon, M1 was clearly a single movie, he is the one, he gets the girl, Smith is dead (or gone at least), story's over !!
well indeed now aday every good story can have a sequel
it's all about the money
FFS best example is disney
they now have a sequel to almost every story they have
(with the exception of snowwhite I think)
__________________ Be smart, be cool, be sexy = be LIBERAL!
I love sequels. THey give more depth to a story. Some sequels suck and you can defenitley see that Hollywood has no ideas any more. Every little thing is turned into a movie.Even thaty stupidest comic books. But you have to say that allmost everything has alredy been done. If you could make movei or just write a script what would you write about. Trust me most of it has already out there
well about the comic book thing, after Spiderman, they were all basically for money. I mean I'm sure whoever made the movies is a huge fan of the movies, but its still mostly for money. Or maybe Marvel wants to do some kind of saga?
KMC Community Forums
Oct 15th, 2003 04:41 PM
The first two may not have been that good but this one and the fourth one should be great! Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban and Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire! Though I do like the books better the movies.... But the books mature as Harry gets older.... so than movies should too! 
