(Ock this isn't anything towards you so take no offence)
Your so funny, I know what you said was right but then you add "ock will back me on this" ... I mean seriously for someone who doesn't post here alot, or for anyone period why do you think adding that comment at the end will change someones veiws.. If I wrote >>
The blob is the next villain in spiderman 3.. miroku will back me on this
Do you think anyone will care... Now once again Ock this isnt against you..lol.. I just found it funny, thats all...
I guess you have someone who thinks very highly of you YOU HAVE FANS
__________________
I am the evil Seed...The seed that went Wrong... The seed that spread horror...The seed that was Never meant to be......
You still have no f*cking proof. Sony had planned after the first was released for more than three. I WATCHED AN INTERVIEW WITH TOBEY MAGUIRE WHEN HE SAID IT HIMSELF! Also, there hasn't been a good trilogy on film since Star Wars, and that's not even a trilogy anymore. (LOTR was so far from the books it was pathetic, so don't start with me there, and The Matrix has even been said BY ITS OWN CREATORS that it wasn't what they originally intended, and sucks in comparison) Trilogies, while they do have their logical side, aren't good for comic books, because the story never ends. We're not talking about a story that has had an end yet. Also, let's think about this for a second. First Spider-Man movie did great in the box offices. Second Spidey movie did the same. Unless Raimi really screws up the third movie, it's gonna do great. This isn't a DC comics movie we're talking about here. (Sorry, but it took them to Batman Begins to be good again, and Superman Returns looks like shit) Now, I'm not saying that the rest of the crew won't stay, because I wish someone better than Raimi would come along and introduce the Symbiotes correctly. Someone like Robert Rodriguez or Paul W.S. Anderson could do it well, mostly because they're huge comic fans, and symbiote fans. Now, as for the actors, playing a superhero or someone that's affiliated with one puts you at an iconic state. Think of Christopher Reeves, and how when you mention Superman, you think of him. I'm not a Superman fan, but Reeves made that character better by the way he acts, mostly because he didn't overcomplicate Supes. Actors love to be iconic characters, and Spider-Man allowed these lesser known actors and actresses to move to that kind of status. They'll be remembered for a long time as the people who played Spider Man, Mary Jane, and so forth. Put yourself in that position. Would you turn down the opportunity? No.
Now that I've said my piece, I'm gonna quit arguing about this crap, and just be grateful that there's gonna be a third movie.
1. I still have no proof? You're the one that is going on saying that you know for a fact that they're planning 7, and you haven't given us a single bit of information about it, but "I know." Thusly, I will not accept it as a fact that Sony has done that. I'm sure Sony wants to have as many Spider-Man films as possible as long as they're making them money, but that does not mean it is written in a contract or anything, and until you prove it to me, I'll have to stick to my saying that it is not confirmed for that to be the case, and since it is not confirmed, your idea of it being confirmed is wrong.
2. The fact that The Matrix wasn't a planned trilogy does not influence Spider-Man films at all, and I have no idea how you came across that conclusion.
3. Yes, actors enjoy being an icon - HOWEVER, and anybody that knows anything about film will back me up on this, actors DO NOT WISH TO BE TYPECAST. That is why people are hesitant about taking up the role of James Bond, because once you're Bond, you're Bond, and nobody else. What was Roger Moore after 007? Nothing. What was Dalton after 007? Nothing. Lazenby wasn't even 007 long enough to mention in such a category, but he has had no career afterwards, even less than those 2. Connery and Brosnan have had careers after 007, but every time someone mentions their name, they get the Bond note. Actors do not wish to be typecast, and because of that, they don't stay on films for more than a few. Tobey Maguire may be a Spider-Man fan but he would not make 7 films in a row, which would make his other films have to suffer, which would increase his "Tobey is Peter" image and lessen his "Tobey is an actor" ideal. Then he's Peter Parker for the rest of his life, and he can never get any good roles, because everyone just sees him on the screen as "Hey wasn't that the guy who played Peter Parker?"
You mention Christopher Reeve...and you proved my point completely. When you hear Reeve, you think Superman. Do you think of anything else? No. Typecast = no good roles = not a happy actor.
More like Peter overload. Isn't Paul W.S. Anderson the guy that did the RE movies? If that is him, I don't want him anywhere NEAR the Spider-Man movies.
venom is not illogical because he has been introduced in a number of ways. They don't necicarily have to go secret wars, they could do what the animated series did and have it come from space and bond with spidey or they could do what ultimate spiderman did and have it be a scientific creation.
1. The line about Eddie being on it for weeks - doesn't really set anything up.
2. Jameson having been to the moon - but that would require a lot of screentime to have a spaceship crash and so forth, and I don't think they'll go the alien route. Plus, they can't just say it already crashed and all that, cause that's just cheating the fans out of a spaceship crash and whatnot.
3. The fact that the next logical upgrade would be for him to be TOO powerful, which the symbiote could do - but they don't have enough time for all that stuff.
Read it again, edit. God, you're a edit. I told you that I WATCHED AN INTERVIEW WITH TOBEY MAGUIRE, AND HE CONFIRMED THAT HE HAD SIGNED A CONTRACT TO MAKE SEVEN MOVIES! Jesus Christ! Do I have to put up a god damn neon sign for you to get it you edit. Now, think about this for a second, and stop arguing. Lest we forget that many actors have well known characters, such as Anthony Hopkins with Hannibal Lecter, Brad Pitt with Tyler Durden, and so forth. I'm just gonna be honest right now. You're not in Hollywood. You've never been in Hollywood. You never will be in Hollywood. So, you will not understand how it works. And with 007, there hasn't been an amazing actor that came from those roles since Sean Connery. So, shut up, stop arguing, and leave it be. You made one statement into a huge argument, and it just wasn't necessary. I have proof, you don't. So, do us all a favor and .go play a game of hide and go edit yourself
Last edited by Paola on Jan 20th, 2006 at 04:11 PM
KMC Community Forums
Because
Jan 19th, 2006 08:04 PM
YOU HAVE FANS 
ok
