__________________ Recently Produced and Distributed Young but High-Ranking Political Figure of Royal Ancestry within the Modern American Town Affectionately Referred To as Bel-Air.
I don't know why really. (It's never good to not support your answer I know. lol) But it just doesn't excite me all that much. The second half however, is another story. It's pure cinema gold.
ESB was only good for darth vader to tell luke hes his father. THATS IT!
the real movie to be best is ROTS!@
the film hasbetter vituals and better effects than anyother previos starwars film
the old trilogy is lame an outdated the new triology is what the fans realy want and that was to see anakin before and after he fall to the dark side.
this is the best order
ROTS
AOTC
TPM
ESB
ANH
ROTJ
there is noting more to say. ROTS IS THE BEST STAR WARSFILM EVER!!! stupid cluless noobs.
The real fans want the PT? Erm, from what I've noticed, that's not the truth, and it's the hardcore fans who've given the PT the most criticism.
Visuals and effects do not make a movie great. They're just pretty things to distract everyone from the poor storytelling and directing.
The OT is not outdated. Rather, Lucas couldn't be bothered to make sure the PT matched the OT, hence the plotholes and such. The OT was first, therefore it's the PT that's off.
I wouldn't be surprised if you are one of those people who think they should redo the OT to match the PT.
ROTS was mediocre. Of course I like it, but it fails in comparison to all of the OT, including ROTJ. Anakins fall was unbelieveably fast. The PT had a terrible story and the only saving grace were the visuals which Lucas and Co. love to talk about while jerking eachother off.
The OT had substance. The PT has pretty flashing lights.
The only PT element I would have liked to see in the OT is the lightsaber duels. The OT needed NO CGI added to it. I hate the SE's but I got the DVD's anyway since Lucas is too stupid to release the OT originals.
Silly me. Maybe those old movies DO suck...because effects then truly weren't as good as they are now. Plus they had all those other failings like good plots, charaters with depth and development, decent dialogue, good pacing, and solid directing that just make them "lame".
Good thing the new trilogy doesn't have a lot of that in it or it would suck!
...wait a minute..."WATSUA MEESA SAYING!!!" -my point exactly.
I hated the SEs. Stuff got changed and added that shouldn't have been. Have you ever seen the theatrical releases as opposed to the 97 SEs? Somehow I doubt it.
Obviously you CAN have a SW movie without super-cool visuals. The OT was about the story, not all the pretty flashy computer stuff they could do. And it was far better because of it. Believe it or not, but plot, character development, depth, etc. are FAR more important than cool effects. And this is coming from someone who's got ADHD and the attention span of a goldfish.
Am I sure I know what I'm talking about? Of course I am. I first saw the OT at the age of 10. I've seen all six movies over 30 times each, ROTS being the exception with about 10 viewings because it's the newest. I do believe I know what I'm talking about.
Contrary to what you may think, the duels, while being cool, are not the most important part of the movies.
And remember the difference between the OT and PT. As Lucas himself said, the PT showed the Jedi at their golden age, while the OT had an old man, a cripple in a suit, a barely trained apprentice, and an ancient midget. The duels aren't supposed to be all jumpy and flashy, and if they were it would have absolutely destroyed the believability of it.
this is STUPID i made my ****en point and you just dont get it. you call yourself real fans because you saw the OT and
you liked. i happen to watch all of them. and i know that star war was imconplete without the fall of anakin. if you dont understand that then call dont yourselfs starwars fans. star wars neede ROTS. period!
THE END
__________________ join the darkside or else!
Last edited by Obi Mynobi on Mar 28th, 2006 at 05:56 AM