The Monarchy Never Ended

Started by Deano2 pages

The Monarchy Never Ended

from a very mainstream source!!New England Historic Genealogical Society

Recent findings from mainstream genealogists have revealed that the people in power today in the United States are directly descended from the Royal and aristocratic families of Europe who originated in the Mesopotamia region in the near-East at the time of Sumer and Babylon.

This theme of the same bloodlines “keeping the power within the family” is not only in the United States. It is every single country on the planet.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

It is commonly assumed that there is no aristocracy, let alone nobility, in America. Nothing could be farther from the truth. In his work, Ancestors of American Presidents, Gary Boyd Roberts of the New England Historic Genealogical Society reveals at least 33 presidents of the United States have been related to England’s King Alfred the Great (849-899) and Charlemagne (742-814), the famous monarch of France, and 19 Presidents are related to England’s King Edward III (1312-1377), who has a thousand blood connections to Prince Charles. Royal descendency is not only common for presidents but for other leading politicians, banking and business tycoons, military leaders, media owners, government officials, intelligence agency chiefs, etc, etc, and you will find they come from the same bloodlines which can be charted back to the British and European royal and aristocratic families and their origins in the Middle and Near East at the time of Sumer and Babylon.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

John Galt (a pen name of a researcher fearing to be identified), in an unpublished manuscript (now in my possession), The Genealogy of the New World Order, has traced the royal ancestry of George Bush, which traces from Charlemagne and Alfred the Great, all the way down through George Bush's 32 presidential cousins!

Both George Bush and Barbara Pierce Bush (of Merrill, Lynch, Pierce, Fenner and Smith) are descended from the same Pierce family of England as President Franklin Pierce. Originally known as the enormously powerful Percy family of England, a name change to Pierce was required along with a quick immigration to America, when their involvement in the failed Gun Powder Plot to blow up Parliament became known. One of the Percy castles, where this plot was hatched was known as Sion (Sun) House.

Other notable Bush relatives include the Grovsner families of England and America, and the Taft family of Ohio. The Grovsners of England are the Dukes of Westminster who own the most substantial properties in the City of London --- the banker's capital. Of over 100,000 acres of Grovsner property, most is in the financial district of London! In America, the Grovsners founded Nation Geographic.

National Geographic is known for sweeping down on the archeological treasures of the world, especially those of a religious significance, and spiriting them away to the Smithsonian Institute, controlled by their cousins the Smithsons, also descended from the Percys. Imposing false interpretations on religious finds is very important to the House of Sion. As interesting as these family affiliations are, it is the Taft family which turns out to be the most politically interesting.

Bush and Gore’s Bloodline Battle

Do presidential candidates Al Gore and George W. Bush have royal connections? Buckingham Palace politely declined to comment.

When it comes to picking the winner in the American presidential race, Britain’s leading chroniclers of royal ancestors say they’ve never been wrong — not once in almost 200 years.

Based on facts gleaned from the old scrolls and dusty archives of Burke’s Peerage — researchers of royal bloodlines since 1826 — the Brits wager it will be Texas Gov. George W. Bush.

“The presidential candidate with the most royal genes and chromosomes has, up to now, always won the White House,” say the researchers at Burke’s Peerage.

They say Bush’s blue blood runs thicker than Vice President Al Gore’s. In fact it trumps the royal ties of every other president to date, including his father’s. It seems George W. has inherited his mother’s deep blue blood-line.

(Note: George W. Bush has the MOST ROYAL GENEALOGY of ANY president of this nation, with ties to EVERY European Monarch. This is highly significant.)

His Royal Highness, King Dubya
Burke’s publishing director, Harold Brooks-Baker says Bush’s royal connections are startling.

“[Bush] is closely related to every European Monarch both on and off the throne,” says Brooks-Baker.

Some of the governor’s royal kin include Britain’s Queen Elizabeth II, the Queen Mother, Dutchess Sarah “Fergy” Ferguson and even the late Princess Diana.

His most prominent ancestor may be England’s King Charles II, who shared the governor’s vision of a strong military.

Going back nearly 1000 years, Brooks-Baker points out both the Bush and Pierce families [Barbara Bush’s maiden name is Pierce] were high society.

“Not one member of his family was working class, middle class, or even middle, middle class,” he notes.

Al’s Family Hardly Peasants
Gore’s family members weren’t exactly peasants. The vice president’s family tree includes Charlemagne and three Holy Roman emperors.

(Note: Charlemagne is credited with founding the Holy Roman Empire. Now consider the next sentence.).

And a good fight wouldn’t frighten the vice president’s most famous ancestor, England’s Edward I — best known today as the king who defeated, then executed Braveheart.

Edward was also said to be very popular with the ladies. His descendent, Al Gore certainly won the hearts of many American ladies with “that kiss” he publicly planted on wife Tipper.

Although Gore is running a bit behind Bush in the European royal count, his blood-line runs close to some American home-grown nobility, including Thomas Jefferson, Daniel Boone, and “Buffalo Bill” Cody.

Trump Card
Buckingham Palace politely declined to comment on the recorded royal connections of either candidate.

“This sort of thing happens every time there’s an American Presidential Election,” scoffed one palace official.

But if the Burke’s Peerage prediction has its doubters, the company doesn’t hesitate to defend its crowning legacy.

“You can’t just write off 200 years of accurate predictions,” says Brooks-Baker pointing out Mike Dukakis learned about the “royal factor” the hard way. The 1988 Democratic nominee and son of Greek immigrants had no connections to any European thrones, and he lost in a landslide.

Well... That explains the inbred look in both the Royals and the Bushes...
😆

What about JFK? He was related to Irish peasants.

John Galt (a pen name of a researcher fearing to be identified), in an unpublished manuscript (now in my possession)

Notice how the "source" material has only been seen by the author and no one else. The researcher is not identified, nor has the manuscript with its bibliography been kept from the general public and the scrutiny of other researchers.

I noticed the mention of "mainstream genealogists," but only one name is mentioned. Maybe the author needs to produce other names.

News flash. Everybody in the world is related to everybody else in the world if you go back far enough.

Originally posted by Oswald Kenobi
News flash. Everybody in the world is related to everybody else in the world if you go back far enough.

Source?

Originally posted by KidRock
Source?

Source? Read any science book on the subject.

It's funny how this guy can trace back records of people's births and decendancy to Charlemagne or over 1000 years ago. Does anyone truly have any concept of how hard that would be if not impossible for the average person?

Written records of births and deaths were shoddily kept at best until recent history, and true bloodlines can't be proven with certainty, merely suggested at best.

But once again we see the claim to a legitimate source, but in the end it is an author with an assumed name offering no documentation or proof of his findings.

Just do a search on "Burke's Peerage prediction" and look at the results. All conspiracy pages. Again.

another interesting and kind of related issue....the most prolific gene in the world is descended from the genghis khan family

wierd though..all the most powerful people from 100's of years ago..the people who was related to them are in power now

Recent findings from mainstream genealogists have revealed that the people in power today in the United States are directly descended from the Royal and aristocratic families of Europe who originated in the Mesopotamia region in the near-East at the time of Sumer and Babylon
😂 😂 guess the Scandinavian royals have to be left out of this 😂 😂

wierd though..all the most powerful people from 100's of years ago..the people who was related to them are in power now
oh the royal families of Scandinavia have no real powers

John Galt?...somebody read his Ayn Rand didn't they...

Originally posted by Deano
wierd though..all the most powerful people from 100's of years ago..the people who was related to them are in power now

Weird? No, it's just a crock of shit.

Originally posted by KharmaDog
It's funny how this guy can trace back records of people's births and decendancy to Charlemagne or over 1000 years ago. Does anyone truly have any concept of how hard that would be if not impossible for the average person?

Written records of births and deaths were shoddily kept at best until recent history, and true bloodlines can't be proven with certainty, merely suggested at best.

But once again we see the claim to a legitimate source, but in the end it is an author with an assumed name offering no documentation or proof of his findings.

Just do a search on "Burke's Peerage prediction" and look at the results. All conspiracy pages. Again.

And notice how Deano doesn't address the concerns I bring up about the validity of findings.

It's funny how this guy can trace back records of people's births and decendancy to Charlemagne or over 1000 years ago. Does anyone truly have any concept of how hard that would be if not impossible for the average person?
actually in Norway we have church books that are close to a 1000 years that provide the information needed to trace back ones family, my father used this to trace back our family but that doesnt go out for the entire country though. We just happen to come form the area that has the best preserved church books

Originally posted by finti
actually in Norway we have church books that are close to a 1000 years that provide the information needed to trace back ones family, my father used this to trace back our family but that doesnt go out for the entire country though. We just happen to come form the area that has the best preserved church books

Granted there is exceptions. But It seems that these conspiracey folks have access to 'secret' documents that the rest of the world is unaware about. I just think that for the most part it is a little far fetched.

Originally posted by KharmaDog
Granted there is exceptions. But It seems that these conspiracey folks have access to 'secret' documents that the rest of the world is unaware about. I just think that for the most part it is a little far fetched.

Don't forget that these "secret" documents are almost never produced by the loonies either. And in the rare instance that they do, the documents never hold up to expert scrutiny.

Granted there is exceptions. But It seems that these conspiracey folks have access to 'secret' documents that the rest of the world is unaware about. I just think that for the most part it is a little far fetched.
on that I agree.
And as said before the Royals in Scandinavia hold no power

No one anywhere is sophisticated enough such a conspiracy (or whatever)
going for so long.

No one could keep somehting like that going for so long, I mean.