Anyway Kenobi, here's what you wanted but I don't know why I bother since you're mashed up head is gonna dismiss it as false in some way or another just like everything else we have shown you.
REDUCTIO AD ABSURDUM: WTC 7
In the May House Science Committee W. Gene Corley, the American Society of Civil Engineers representative on the BPAT, conceded that “Building 7, which was across the street from the main towers, also collapsed and provided us with the first example that we recognized of a building collapsing as a result of fire.” (House May 30) WTC 7 presents
the image of a classical controlled demolition. Whereas the twin towers are seen to explode, WTC 7 implodes – it falls in upon itself with none of the spectacular mushroom plumes of smoke and powder which had marked the demise of the larger twin towers. The foundations collapse before the façade, the middle of the building collapses before the outer walls, and streamers of smoke are emitted from the façade. WTC 7 did imitate
the twin towers by collapsing almost exclusively upon its own foundations. WTC 7 contained electrical generators and a supply for diesel fuel to operate these, and apologists of the official version like Gerald Posner have seized on this circumstance to make the collapse of this building plausible. But there has been no sign of raging diesel fuel fires, as can be seen from the photos of the fall of WTC 7, so the apologists are
grasping at straws. The owner of the WTC complex was Larry Silverstein, who recounted the fall of WTC 7 in the September 2002 PBS documentary, America Rebuilds, complete with this
astounding revelation:[B]“I remember getting a call from the…fire department commander, telling me that they were not sure they were going to be able to contain the fire, and I said, ‘we’ve had such terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing is to pull it. And they made the decision to pull and we watched the building collapse.” “To pull” would appear to be the jargon term in controlled demolition circles for the deliberate detonation of charges leading to the destruction of a building.[B\] And if WTC 7 was pulled, why not WTC
1 and 2?
__________________
"How about this? Shut your mouth...Or I'll kick your teeth down your throat and shut it for you."
Many good points but please quantum physics is as disputible as mainstream physics and leaves many unanswerd questions.
Your 3rd last pg in which you called him a zombie was a little overzealous perhaps he is just unable to accept that his "security" and lifestyle arnt what they seem,as for the media i totally agree if you examine the american news for example it is filled with fear spawning and really aims to get people worked up and feel scared and insecure therefor more dependent on their government which they reliy on for protection.
No, I have asked for a source other than a conspiracy theorist. You have provided none. No Dan Rather backing up your claims. No legitimate mainstream research, only one conspiracy theorist sourcing another conspiracy theorist.
Kenobi... people standing in the blast holes and jumping out the buildings was reported on mainstream news, okay?
Ohh man this just takes the biscuit.
Do you seriously think I swallow it all without question? I read from many different authors and the main themes and details are all agreed upon and even experts on ancient history like Zecharia Sitchin agree on the reptilians/interbredding/bloodlines side of it all.
Nope, I get pissed at you becuase you can never see the elephant when its sitting next to you.
Yes, there was was talk of razing two or three other buildings, but WTC 7 fell before they could secure it. This is from my brother in law at the NYPD, who was there on scene.
No, people jumping out of the building was reported on the mainstream news. People standing in the blast holes is completely false. Now, you're telling me what I saw with my own eyes if false too.
Yup and the excuse was a little fire broke out in one of the room
That banking building on the other side was closer to the WTC buildings AND EVEN GOT HIT AS BUILDING 2 COLLAPSED YET IT SURVIVED WITH ONLY MINOR DAMAGE YET A BUILDINGS TWICE THE DISTANCE AWAY WHICH NEVER GOT TOUCHED, GOT RAISED TO THE GROUND IN TEXT-BOOK DEMOLITION STYLE!!!!
There was damage to the building. It's so goddam funny that you will call anybody who was there a liar simply because they disgree with you, but you will believe someone half a world away that has never viewed the site, a credible source.
whether people was in the blast holes or not...point is the goverment and the scum behind the scenes orchestrated this attack for there own selfish politics. just like hitler did when he firebombed his own reichstag building to scare the people. if you still think al C.I.Aida could pull of such an attack..you are truely gone...maybe you can tell me why NORAD stood down for the first time in 50 years..maybe you can tell me why this event was predicted on an illuminati board game along with the pentagon attacks....maybe you can tell me why the madrid building didnt fall after days of being on fire..yet twin towers collapsed within an hour
maybe you can tell me why you are so brainwashed
__________________
"How about this? Shut your mouth...Or I'll kick your teeth down your throat and shut it for you."
But you quote CBS in one of your tirades, Novusordo. If the mainstream media is not to believed, why should someone believe it when it agrees with you?
tell me what damage ??
what damage could of brought that building down?
the building was far away from the twin towers
the buildings that larry silverstein didnt own..didnt collapse
__________________
"How about this? Shut your mouth...Or I'll kick your teeth down your throat and shut it for you."
i have a theory,it may not be true but its credible
Bush received warnings that an Islamic group was planning a terrorist atrocity,Bush chose not to act because it would suit his own further gains in a war in the middle east that he was planning.
The planes where hijacked and headed for their targets however the pentagon was not one of them the government (bush) wanted to eliminate those who did not agree with his war policy.
The planes hit Bush used the catastrophe to his advantage and it helped him start a global war on terror which he new hed be able to use to attack Saddam and bush also may have other buildings such as the ones miles from WTC destroyed to fit his own agenda
The media are there to pound the version of events the Illuminati want the masses to believe and so anything that goes AGAINST the official line, must be true. Does that make sense to you?
KMC Community Forums
Jul 8th, 2005 04:39 PM
