But you produced those pictures to back up your argument. Now you're saying they're irrelevant. I have an eyewitness account that says there weren't people there, but I'm a liar. I know other eyewitnesses, but they are liars.
Please quote in the 9/11 Commission Report where it says NORAD stood down for the first time in 50 years.
The Madrid building fire was not jet fuel. Jet fuel burns at a high heat. There was no impact the weakened the supports of the Madrid building. The Madrid building was not 110 stories tall and affected by wind like the WTC towers. You're apples and Toyotas, Deano.
Yes that is pretty much it but I'd replace everywhere the word "Bush" is mentioned with "Illuminati" and I'd also add that it wasen't so much of a case of the Illuminati finding out they were going to do it but it was the Illuminati controlled CIA and other intelligence agencies that organised and instigated it to happen.
CIA officials met Bin Laden a month before 9/11, for example.
Presidents are merely adminastrators and I'd be generous to put them above 3/4 of the global manipulation heirachy so a much more powerfull force had to be involved in order to control the entities that could of stopped the attacks. That force is the Illuminati.
Whenever stuff like this happens, always ask two questions: "who gains" and "who had control over the security".
oh and guess who ran security on the twin towers?....MARVIN BUSH! cousin of the president.....and guess when his contract ended?....SEPT 11 2001
his job was done
__________________
"How about this? Shut your mouth...Or I'll kick your teeth down your throat and shut it for you."
Well sometimes they have to allow certain information to be reported such as the Downing Street Memo's recently. They woulden't get away with not reporting stuff like that but they did try to for a few weeks.
That is false. There was structural damage to WTC 7.
No, the engineers said the towers were built to withstand multiple small airplane impacts. In fact, the lead engineer said that they never took into account that a jumbo jet liner would strike the building when they designed it.
You are correct. Fires alone cannot bring down a modern skyscraper. An impact from a transcontinental jetliner and the ensuing fire can bring down a skyscraper.
You know what i find odd in these big wars the "enemy"(illuminati members??) always get away,for example Kaiser Wilhelm obviously a member he escaped WW1,Hitler was never positivly identified beyond reasonable doubt,Mullah Mohammed Omar escaped Afganistan,Bin Laden escaped Saddam escaped only to be found later but perhaps at illuminati convenence
explain to me norad, marvin bush, larry silverstein saying he pulled the wtc 7 building
please explain the difference between hitler bombing his own reicstag building and the goveremnt bombing there own building so they can take your freedoms away, just like hitlser tryed to do...
10 years time it will be like living in nazi germany..with everyone with a damn microchip in there hand..and yet people wont seem to mind that they are in a prison planet..which scares the hell out of me
__________________
"How about this? Shut your mouth...Or I'll kick your teeth down your throat and shut it for you."
I do understand. You're saying that if someone who lies to you everyday says something different one day must be telling the truth for that one day. That's flawed logic.
The 911 COmmission was seriously compromised of CFR and TC members which tie into the Round Table network of secret societies who's sole purpose it is to bring about the full implementation of the NWO so basicly, again, you are asking for sources who's job it is to cover it all up.
Besides, I find it hard to beleive you are unaware of NORAD's stand-down since it was mainstream news for ages.
Its official that NORAD where orderd to stand down that is one of the major strong points for conspiricy theorests,but then what could NORAD do shoot down civillians
KMC Community Forums
Jul 8th, 2005 05:01 PM
