KillerMovies - Movies That Matter!

REGISTER HERE TO JOIN IN! - It's easy and it's free!
Home » Movies » Movie Discussion » "The Vomitorium" - Reviews By KMC Members

"The Vomitorium" - Reviews By KMC Members
Started by: Cinemaddiction

Forum Jump:
Post New Thread    Post A Reply
Pages (13): « First ... « 3 4 [5] 6 7 » ... Last »   Last Thread   Next Thread
Author
Thread
idowhatiamtold
Senior Member

Gender: Unspecified
Location: United States

:'( I was looking forward to The Interpreter....

Old Post Nov 9th, 2005 07:33 PM
idowhatiamtold is currently offline Click here to Send idowhatiamtold a Private Message Find more posts by idowhatiamtold Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Solo
Senior Member

Gender: Male
Location:

quote: (post)
Originally posted by Wolfie
if you didn't like the first SAW, you probably won't like the second.

One week too late.

The Interpreter was alright, just not as good as it could have been.

Old Post Nov 10th, 2005 12:13 AM
Solo is currently offline Click here to Send Solo a Private Message Find more posts by Solo Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Tptmanno1
Life Ponder-er

Gender: Male
Location: Dreaming...Or am I living...

Didn't like Interpreter 2 at all...


__________________

Old Post Nov 10th, 2005 12:24 AM
Tptmanno1 is currently offline Click here to Send Tptmanno1 a Private Message Find more posts by Tptmanno1 Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Wolfie
Keep on howling!

Gender: Male
Location: California

quote: (post)
Originally posted by Solo
One week too late.

On the other hand, I talked to my friend a couple days ago, she hates the original with a passion but she thought the second wasn't too bad.


__________________

Old Post Nov 10th, 2005 12:51 AM
Wolfie is currently offline Click here to Send Wolfie a Private Message Find more posts by Wolfie Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Dusty
Senior Member

Gender: Male
Location: The United States. I <3 U

Chicken little 2005

More than I expected anyway.

So I go out on another random movie run looking for buried treasure, so after seeing the awful "Madagascar" I thought I
might check out another Animated movie of th sorts, so I looked at chicken little At about 12:25 or so. But I won't keep you waiting with the boring stuff, Here's the review.

Chicken little is actually the best we've had since the "incredibles" or "Finding nemo", It was a hundred times better than "Robots" and ran circles around "Madagascar". Not a minute goes by where something isn't funny to tell the hones truth. The thing I really liked about this movie is the fact that they went that extra mile to really colorize the characters. The Characters are so awesome, I just loved all of them. Not to mention the fact that the animation they use on "chicken little" is something we haven't seen before, It's a little more chalky, giving out the idea that they aren't trying to look real. They are trying to look unique in a cartoon kind of way. Plus they also try and use the shaky camera effect which animators don't usually use because of the difficulty. After the movie I couldn't help but ask my brother, "who was your favorite character?". There are lots of characters to like here.

It's almost impossible to hate this movie IMO, unless you are looking for the best picture type. I should also warn you, be prepared to see celebrity guest voices in this movie, such as Adam West, the Batman himself. All in all this movie was ALOT better than I expected it to be. It's a good little family movie, and a GREAT time killer. The only real disappointment I had was the fact that it was only 81 minutes long.

Old Post Nov 13th, 2005 05:36 AM
Dusty is currently offline Click here to Send Dusty a Private Message Find more posts by Dusty Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
NightWriter
Seeker of Inspiration

Gender: Male
Location: Do you really care? I don't.

Nice review yes


__________________
Frankly, im to lazy to find something clever to put here, sue me no expression

Old Post Nov 13th, 2005 06:20 PM
NightWriter is currently offline Click here to Send NightWriter a Private Message Find more posts by NightWriter Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Dr. Strangelove
The King Stay The King

Gender: Male
Location: Interzone University

"Man Bites Dog (It Happened In Your Neighborhood )"

Ben (Benoit Poelvoorde) is eccentric, witty, intelligent, charming...oh and a serial killer. Filmed by documentary filmmakers looking for a truly evil human being, they follow his every move: from his murders, rapes to his harmless talks about women or chats with his grandparents. As the filmmakers follow this killing specimen, they themselves get rapped up in his own games of sadistic killing, drawing the line in objectivity in film, journalism and the like.

The film shot in documentary style gives it unflinching realism to a sickening in-your-face level. Being shot in black and white reduces any diversions of sights and colors; consequently, this lets you focus on the killer and accomplices actions to the fullest extent. The killings are brutal, without any remorse or sense of pity. Yet with documentary style, it makes the murders so much more realistic than any other type of serial killer movie. To some, the film is considered an black comedy, although the funny parts were pretty thin with all the murder.

Never has a film had a character been so absurdly loony yet still so realistic. Ben has an almost James Bond persona but still has a every day quality that makes him all the more scary. Even as crazy Ben is, it's the documentary film makers that truly change the film. Just starting out filming a psychotic killer, their objectivity goes out the window as they soon become replica's of Ben. At one time, they themselves want to stop filming Ben. They have enough film to make a movie of it, yet they keep coming back to Ben for the interest, pleasure, and fascination. Kinda true about our society. We condone violence, yet we are fascinated by it at the same time.

Man Bites Dog is totally recommended if you loved A Clockwork Orange or Natural Born Killers. It's an terrifying look on violence and violence presented by the media. As Matt Zoller writes in his essay about the film "By the time Man Bites Dog ends, you may wish you'd stopped watching.

But you didn't"


__________________


“As flies to wanton boys are we to the gods, they kill us for their sport.”

Last edited by Dr. Strangelove on Nov 20th, 2005 at 07:43 AM

Old Post Nov 20th, 2005 07:40 AM
Dr. Strangelove is currently offline Click here to Send Dr. Strangelove a Private Message Find more posts by Dr. Strangelove Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
BackFire
Blood. It's nature's lube

Gender: Male
Location: Huntington Beach, CA

Moderator

Nice review, Strangelove. I love Man Bites Dog, truley gripping and disturbing cinema.


__________________

Old Post Nov 20th, 2005 08:12 AM
BackFire is currently offline Click here to Send BackFire a Private Message Find more posts by BackFire Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Dusty
Senior Member

Gender: Male
Location: The United States. I <3 U

thumb up. good review, it's about time this thread got booted up.

I'll try some reviews today on:
Jarhead
Harry potter 4
Zathura


after I ir al cine

Old Post Nov 20th, 2005 04:17 PM
Dusty is currently offline Click here to Send Dusty a Private Message Find more posts by Dusty Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Solo
Senior Member

Gender: Male
Location:

Last 28 Movies I Saw


City of God - (Meirelles, R, 2002): Original and disturbing. Portrays crime and corruption (in the 1960s'-1980s') in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil perfectly. - 10/10

The Blair Witch Project - (Myrick, R, 1999): Great start, horrible ending. - 5/10

Undead- (Spierig, R, 2003): Great stuff. - 7/10

High Tension - (Aja, NC-17, 2003): A gorey "wanna-be-thriller" with horrible dialogue, and a predictable twist. - 3/10

What's Up, Tiger Lily - (Allen, PG, 1966): Not the most entertaining comedy, but it's still funny. - 5/10

Race for Your Life, Charlie Brown! - (Melendez, G, 1977): A wonderful story with fantastic animation sets up for one of the best "Charlie Brown" adventures yet. Although, it was'nt as good as "Bon Voyage, Charlie Brown (and Don't Come Back!)". - 7/10

Gangs of New York - (Scorsese, R, 2002): A terrific, intense, and amazing revenge tale. - 8/10

Jarhead - (Mendes, R, 2005): Dragged out, sloppy, but none-the-less great. With Sarsgaard and Gyllenhaal's amazing performances it's almost ace, pure ace. But the film was dragged down by a sloppy script, and as a result they're sadly left a notch under beautiful. - 9/10

From Dusk Till Dawn - (Rodriguez, R, 1996): If you are looking for a little Halloween movie, with vampire strippers, loads of corney violence, George Clooney, and a Tarantino view of it all, this is your movie. - 6/10

Bon Voyage, Charlie Brown - (Mendez, G, 1980): Magnificent story, magnificent adventure, magnificent characters, magnificent animation. - 8/10

Fritz Lang's M - (Lang, NR, 1931): Peter Lorre made this movie. The beggining is very slow, but the middle starts to pick up it's pace, and in the end, it's two-hours well spent. Not the best two-hours spent though. - 8/10

Christmas with the Kranks - (Roth, PG, 2004): Not great, and definately not good, but I guess you could call it decent. - 4/10

The Matrix - (Wachowski, R, 1999): Great. - 7/10

Donnie Darko: Director's Cut - (Kelly, R, 2001): Donnie Darko is easily one of the best films of all time. It's very strange. But then again, tell me a movie that has a six-foot tall bunny rabbit named Frank who's from the future. Donnie Darko is a hidden gem, more people should really see it. A truely deserving pin-point in movie history. It has a very strong performance by Jake Gyllenhaal (Jarhead) and a memorable directorial debut from Richard Kelly. Amazing, it truely is. - 10/10

The Matrix Reloaded - (Wachowski, R, 2003): The Matrix Reloaded puts itself in a pickle. By viewing this, most people would think nothing of it, but what they can't see, is that it flows much better. It's much harder to understand, but once you do understand, it's a lot more entertaining than the first. It answers all of the questions from the original, and makes a few more too. It's much better than The Matrix, but not too much better. - 7/10

Harold and Kumar Go To White Castle - (Leiner, R, 2004): Harold and Kumar Go To White Castle is a teen movie, but it succeeds at being a hilarious adventure. - 8/10

Pulp Fiction - (Tarantino, R, 1994): Tarantino's second flick is a lot better than the first. Although, that isn't saying much considering they're both masterpieces. Easily one of the best and influencial films of all time. - 10/10

Reservoir Dogs - (Tarantino, R, 1992): Tarantino's directorial debut is one of the most emotional, powerful, and entertaining movies of all time. - 9/10

Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire - (Newell, PG-13, 2005): This addition the the Potter franchise outdoes the previous takes. Newell shines a new light on Harry Potter, and the film is more intense, entertaining, and emotionally provoked than ever. Will this be the best movie of the year? Depends, but right now the chances look pretty good. - 9/10

Dr. Strangelove or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Bomb - (Kubrick, PG, 1964): Pretty overrated, but it does have it's moments. - 7/10

Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban - (Cuaron, PG, 2004): The Potter franchise started out roughly, but it looks like it's getting exactly where it should be. - 9/10

Madagascar - (Darnell, PG, 2005): The penguins were hilarious, too bad no one else was. - 3/10

Schindler's List - (Spielberg, R, 1993): Liam Neeson and Ralph Fiennes give strong and emotional performances in Spielberg's visual adaptation of Oskar Schindler's essential part in the Holocaust. - 10/10

Grosse Pointe Blank - (Armitage, R, 1997): George Armitage actually made a good movie. I might even add, John Cusack did a great job. - 7/10

Once Upon a Time in Mexico - (Rodriguez, R, 2003): This one wouldn't have been anything without Johnny Depp. A truely great action film, and it takes some unexpected turns. - 8/10

A Christmas Carol - (Marin, G, 1938): The adaptation of the classic Dickens' novel. The film has obvious potential, but it goes to fast and cuts many parts of the novel. It fails to rise to the novel's magnificence. - 7/10

The Family Man - (Ratner, PG-13, 2000): Sure, it teaches morals, but it's still too long, and I might even say, gay. - 3/10

Frank Miller's Sin City - (Miller/Rodriguez, R, 2005): A triumphantly disturbing masterpiece. Yep, it has it's flaws, but what doesn't? - 10/10

Old Post Nov 27th, 2005 07:53 PM
Solo is currently offline Click here to Send Solo a Private Message Find more posts by Solo Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Dusty
Senior Member

Gender: Male
Location: The United States. I <3 U

thumb up good thinking.

I might do something like that.

Old Post Nov 27th, 2005 07:58 PM
Dusty is currently offline Click here to Send Dusty a Private Message Find more posts by Dusty Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Cory Chaos
AmStar 14 Manager

Gender: Male
Location: Mooresville, NC

Those aren't reviews. They're more like short, and ultimately invalid opinions.

Ranking "Christmas With the Kranks" above "High Tension". That's a ****ing gas. roll eyes (sarcastic)

Old Post Nov 28th, 2005 12:05 AM
Cory Chaos is currently offline Click here to Send Cory Chaos a Private Message Find more posts by Cory Chaos Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Dusty
Senior Member

Gender: Male
Location: The United States. I <3 U

quote: (post)
Originally posted by Cinemaddiction
Those aren't reviews. They're more like short, and ultimately invalid opinions.

Ranking "Christmas With the Kranks" above "High Tension". That's a ****ing gas. roll eyes (sarcastic)


They're quickies cine, for people who don't feel like reading a 2 page reviews. There is NO such thing as an invalid opinion, an opinion is an opinion, not a fact. And he ranked "High tension" above "Christmas with the cranks" based on an OPINION. also you need to remember you put "spice world" in your favorites list. Now maybe I think that movie is shit, but I'm not going to bother you about it becuase it's your opinion, and not my own.

Last edited by Dusty on Nov 28th, 2005 at 12:25 AM

Old Post Nov 28th, 2005 12:17 AM
Dusty is currently offline Click here to Send Dusty a Private Message Find more posts by Dusty Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Solo
Senior Member

Gender: Male
Location:

quote: (post)
Originally posted by Cinemaddiction
Ranking "Christmas With the Kranks" above "High Tension". That's a ****ing gas. roll eyes (sarcastic)


I'm sure "Joe Somebody" was a whole lot better?
How about "Spice World"?
And the masterpiece that is "It's Pat!"?

"High Tension" was an unpretentious piece of shit, that tried to pull off a twist, and was, IMO, horribly unoriginal. The only reason people would like "High Tension" is for the gore.

Last edited by Solo on Nov 28th, 2005 at 01:24 AM

Old Post Nov 28th, 2005 01:10 AM
Solo is currently offline Click here to Send Solo a Private Message Find more posts by Solo Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
BackFire
Blood. It's nature's lube

Gender: Male
Location: Huntington Beach, CA

Moderator

The only thing in High Tension that was bad was the twist and a few trivial plot holes. Everything else about the movie - The atmosphere, the suspense, and the gore - was excellent. It was definately one of the best horror films of the last couple of years, hands down.


__________________

Old Post Nov 28th, 2005 01:20 AM
BackFire is currently offline Click here to Send BackFire a Private Message Find more posts by BackFire Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Wolfie
Keep on howling!

Gender: Male
Location: California

"HIGH TENSION" (2003)

Love hurts!

Marie and Alex are off to Alex's parents house in the woods to study. The night they arrive, however, a psychotic killer comes knocking and kills Alex's family. With Alex being taken away, Marie needs to find a way to stop this killer before it's too late for her best friend.

An ode to 1970s horror/slasher films, as director Alexandre Aja describes it. It had a Texas Chainsaw Massacre feel to it in some parts and Halloween in others. I may have been looking too into it, but I noticed a hint of Children of the Corn in one scene. I even sensed Toolbox Murders. Anyway, I can't remember the last time a horror film was released that was this good.

This film is better watched in French with full subtitles. The dubbed version in the cinema featured some subtitles and some dubbing. Cécile De France does her own voiceover for her character of Marie and you can tell she is not fluent in the English language. It was a good idea to have an actor do their own voiceovers but it just didn't pan out here. But that isn't anything to blame the film about.

The deaths were plain and simple, but not in a bad way. The detail in them made it all worth it, such as the woman on the floor with her throat slit open. Of course, every slasher in history has done that but it looked all too real here. The gore was very good. It was graphic and realistic.

Another pleasant graphic moment I found hilarious was the killer getting head from a severed head. It showed the audience just how disgusting this killer was. Many times you say to yourself, "This guy is sick!" This fact was shown very well throughout the film, courtesy of the great actor, Philippe Nahon.

The movie is so good, even a bad ending couldn't ruin it. The film as a whole was scary and thrilling, then they decided to surprise the audience with a twist that came out of left field. I, personally, didn't see it coming because I gave the filmmakers more credit than that. When will the movie industry give the Fight Club ending a rest?

Though the plot twist was lame, unnecessary, and created many plotholes, what came after was it was quite good. It left us with what this "switchblade romance" (the working title of the film) is all about.

Overall, a great movie for any horror fan, easily one of the best of the decade.


__________________

Old Post Nov 30th, 2005 07:08 AM
Wolfie is currently offline Click here to Send Wolfie a Private Message Find more posts by Wolfie Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Tptmanno1
Life Ponder-er

Gender: Male
Location: Dreaming...Or am I living...

I don't know if this is anything like what anyone is looking for, but I had to write it for English, so I though why not!


Magnificent Seven

Made in 1960, The Magnificent Seven stars Yul Brynner, and Eli Wallach among others. It was directed by John Sturges. As movies go, it was simply mediocre, while it held my attention; I wasn’t kept on the edge of my seat with excitement. And with such a movie, it had good and bad qualities. It was very stereotypical for one, it did not pull any punches, you could tell where it was going, it also has suitable music, overrated as it is, and finally it features a strange balance, of very good acting, and very poor acting, and it is obvious where the producers spent their money. But all in all, it was a very run-of-the-mill film that, while not being the best movie ever, it still was better than many other westerns.

This movie was incredibly stereotypical, and the only thing more shocking than that, is how many times this simple plot has been replicated and parodied. The plot itself is a common one, poor farmers hiring gunman for protection. The Mexican bandits, the poor farmers, even the Magnificent Seven were the stereotypical gunmen, loners, who live and die by the gun. This fact in itself serves as one of my questions for the film. Over the course of the film, each main character, with the exception of the kid, always play the loner protagonist. But having a film with seven loners working together, simply doesn’t work, and it raises the question of why they would all want to work together in the first place. Plot holes like this, along with the predictability that comes from the stereotypes keep this film strongly rooted in the mediocre category.

The music, while by Edward Bernstein, a much respected composer is overrated. People swear by this music, as if it was the end all, and the most impressive musical score ever. And all it really ended up being was the repetition of the main theme with a few variations. It never branched out, or served any purpose other than to loudly announce the heroic moment of the seven, and even that got old. It never added any emotional attachment or anything else you expect a score to do. The theme was catchy, I’ll give it that, but its failure to elaborate and to create more emotion brought the movie down.

The acting in this movie was very up and down. The main characters were very well played, except for the kid who I though was slightly overacted, his actions and comedies were taken a bit too far, and you couldn’t ever take him seriously or think of him as anything but bipolar as he went from screaming at the villages to trying to bullfight the docile steer. Then the villager’s acting was so incredibly flat it seemed that the casting director just pulled random people off the street. This made it almost painfully obvious that the producers spent lots of the money in trying to get the bigger stars to be in this movie, that they didn’t have enough left for the other actors and had to settle for less. This oversight or whatever it may be, really cost the movie and causes it to be less effective.

While this movie is acceptable, and is not a total disgrace to the filmmaking community, it is nothing to write home about. And I seriously cannot see how it has become so much of a classic today. There are much better movies out there that don’t get half the exposure this one does. But for a remake of the Chinese film The Seven Samurai it does moderately, but it would be worth the comparison to rent The Seven Samurai simply to see what was changed besides the setting and how

they approached the plot.


__________________

Old Post Dec 2nd, 2005 07:05 AM
Tptmanno1 is currently offline Click here to Send Tptmanno1 a Private Message Find more posts by Tptmanno1 Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Dusty
Senior Member

Gender: Male
Location: The United States. I <3 U

quote: (post)
Originally posted by DeVi| D0do


Here's my review/ramble/collection of words on my opinion of the film...

KING KONG

Absotively, posolutely the BEST film of the year. Bar none. It would seem that Jackson can indeed do no wrong. The three hours are a great butt workout but damn is it worth it. Yet, unlike Lord of the Rings, this is a film I can see myself watching again and again. In fact I can not wait to see it again.

This film is not only true to the nature and spirit of the original, but it adds upon it enourmously. The emotion is astouding. There were moments throughout the enitre film where I got knots in my throat, and if it wasn't for the fact that I went to see it with my mates instead of my girlfriend, there were moments I think I would have shed a tear or two... (but, then, I cried during The Lion King).

Kong himself is simply amazing. If the academy had any balls they'd nominate Andy & Peter & Co. for Best Actor. That's how good he is. There was not a single moment where I didn't totally believe there was a 25 foot gorilla right there. Though, sadly, it seems some of the other effects in the film suffered due to the obvious amount of time spent on Kong. The Brontosoraus stampeed is less than convincing, and some of the creepy crawlies could have done with several more months of post production. But the quality of the CG is forgivable when watching these amazing scenes. And they really are amazing.

Kong vs. T-Rexes. Ho... ly... f*ck. I can say without hyperbole that this is very possibly the greatest sequence ever put to film. I'll leave it at that as to not give anything away. Though, I will say that here the CG is great.

Indeed it does take just under an hour to actually get to Skull Island. And, yes, it is another 20 minutes until we actually get a glimpse of Kong. But what preceeds the arrival on the island is still so great that I didn't even care. In fact, I could have done with more. The first act alone is better than most films. Though there is this strange subplot to do with one of the crew members (Billy Elliot) that really just goes nowhere, and could easily have been done away with.

I've read some reviewers had a problem with the Carl Denham (Jack Black) character. I can understand where they're coming from. I'd have preferred a character more like the original. Jack Black is sometimes just too... Jack Black. It's not distracting, and if you hadn't seen the original I don't you'd have a problem... And even though I had seen the original it wasn't really a problem for me. I liked the way he played it. It was just different.

The relationship between Ann and Kong is just beautiful. The scene where she dances for him is so warm and funny and beautiful. And the scene on the ice in New York could have been so corny and cheesy, but for me it totally worked. Beautiful.

Yeah, so maybe I am biased. Maybe, because I'm a kiwi, because I have enourmous respect for Jackson I was predestined to love this film. Whatever. I love that I love it.

10/10

Old Post Dec 15th, 2005 03:13 AM
Dusty is currently offline Click here to Send Dusty a Private Message Find more posts by Dusty Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Ya Krunk'd Floo
Moving with the swell.

Gender: Male
Location: West of the Sun.

'The Descent'

Spoilers ahead...DO NOT READ IF YOU HAVEN'T SEEN THE MOVIE YET!

Well, my dears...I have just completed the viewing of this particular horror film. My opinion? Why, yes...Of course, I shall come to that as it is what you've all been waiting for, isn't it my poppies? Yes, it is...

Well, with my eyes viewing the screen and thus partaking in the 'movie experience', I was initially rather unsettled and ready to roll. The spear through the window was bank-rolled before the first corner, but that second spear? Well, we all knew something was about to happen, but what we didn't. Jumping jack rabbits, I flinched like a weak kid who is always being picked on! Toughen-up, me boy!

As the females entered the cave, I was filled with dreadful anticipation. With my peeling eyes, I could hardly watch the squeeze through that itsy bitsy pokey holey. It reminded me of a chance happening many moons ago, when a squad of friends and I went cliff jumping. Found an underwater hole, did we 4...so upon dare of trying did we all dive down and through - for if we poultried, then walking home it would be...la la.

On first sight of Chapman's Homer...wait...On first sight of the little monsters, I was a little tweaked. Freaky enough, but a little too precious, if you get my meaning, Gollum. Then, after that skiddadle and swift ascent, I was suitably chicken jittered. After this, some things happened.

Then, that there ending...Suitably up-lifting at first, but then you always knew something had to be up its sleeve seeing as it hadn't finished yet...The final denouement? Hmmmm, maybe a little too tricksy, if you ask me. You didn't? Huh, that's weird. Anyway, yeah, she was loco, but so were her eses. My opinion is that she fell down, down, down and out, then up, up, up and about. The little motion in the car being a strange daymare. Maybe...maybe not...

My brain just don't like the idea that..."Oh, and then I woke up and it was all a dream..., etc." Didn't we all write that at least once during our high-school exams? Hmm....

7/10 - jumpy, but loopy


__________________
Full fathom five thy father lies;
Of his bones are coral made;
Those are pearls that were his eyes:
Nothing of him that doth fade
But doth suffer a sea-change
Into something rich and strange.

Last edited by Ya Krunk'd Floo on Dec 15th, 2005 at 09:36 AM

Old Post Dec 15th, 2005 09:27 AM
Ya Krunk'd Floo is currently offline Click here to Send Ya Krunk'd Floo a Private Message Find more posts by Ya Krunk'd Floo Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
BackFire
Blood. It's nature's lube

Gender: Male
Location: Huntington Beach, CA

Moderator

Man, I've been wanting to see that movie for such a long time, since I heard about it a year ago. Neil Marshal is a great, promising director - Dog Soldiers was outstanding. I hope this comes to the states soon.


__________________

Old Post Dec 16th, 2005 10:17 PM
BackFire is currently offline Click here to Send BackFire a Private Message Find more posts by BackFire Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
All times are UTC. The time now is 05:12 AM.
Pages (13): « First ... « 3 4 [5] 6 7 » ... Last »   Last Thread   Next Thread

Home » Movies » Movie Discussion » "The Vomitorium" - Reviews By KMC Members

Email this Page
Subscribe to this Thread
   Post New Thread  Post A Reply

Forum Jump:
Search by user:
 

Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is OFF
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON

Text-only version
 

< - KillerMovies.com - Forum Archive - Forum Rules >


© Copyright 2000-2006, KillerMovies.com. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by: vBulletin, copyright ©2000-2006, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.