I proved wrong every point he made, he's viewed this thread, taken his ass that was handed to him on a platter with french-fried potatoes and left. Man, I'm good...
wrong again as always.the only retarded fans are the ones who embrace the moronic change to organic webbing instead of the classic chemical webbing and defend it and other moronic decisions sony made with the movies no matter how incredibly stupid they were.a true fan as I have to keep repeating to you man-spider fans,is someone who cares about seeing spidermans true character on screen instead of this phony neautered man-spider version we are seeing. your arguments are laughable and as stupid as always because there are several things in these man-spider movies that are far more rediculous and more stupid than chemical webbing. I already addressed them,go back and read through them because Im not going to repaet it again since you chose to ignore that laughable and lame argument you have against the chemical webbing.you man-spider fans always shoot yourselfs in the foot with that laughable statement that the webshooters are fantasy crap.dont know how to break the news to you but THE WHOLE THING OF SPIDER-MAN IS FANTASY and a guy getting the powers to cling to walls,get super human strength ect from a spiderbite is even more rediculous and fantasy than a kid genious creating a fluid.better luck next time in your wild insane arguments against the webshooters. well if you like your movies to have a real world basis to them then you need to stop watching the man-spider movies because they hardly have that in them. in the real world,the webbing would shoot out his butt.
interesting that all the stuff you mentioned are the things that occured AFTER the first spiderman season cartoon show.the first season of that show which was easily by far its best season of that show was the only season that had good quality writing in that show,after the first season it went downhill from there and got progressively worse with just a few good episodes here and there until the season four, the final season-it got so idiotic I could not take that show anymore and didnt watch the final episodes of that show until several years later because they were as horribly written as the man-spider movies are.
cant YOU just grow up and say -it was a bad movie,that Im just happy a spiderman movie has finally been made and dont care how bad they screwed up the comicbooks? wow,your funny,to cry, tears got to come out of your eyes,the last time I cried was years ago when I lost my dog,THAT did make me cry like a 3 year old and get tears out of my eyes,cant blame me for that,only someone who is heartless wouldnt. got news for you,sony and raimi did not put hard work into it.just like tim burton did not put hard work into making a batman movie,christopher nolan and the screenwriter for batman begins on the other hand DID put hard work into making a batman movie.
still telling lies as always.the organics are a MAJOR change,it doesnt make the movie better,it just dumbs down his character.with organics,any dumb idiot like flash thompson could have been bitten by a spider and become spiderman,but peter was so gifted as a scientist that he was able to do something very few other people could have done to show what a unique person he was by CREATING the webbing.not just ANYBODY could have done that.again your argument agaisnt the webshooters is stupid because AGAIN,the whole thing of spiderman is unbelievable,its even more unbelievable getting the powers he got from a spider as I just pointed out. and I roll the eyes because you ignore points I alread y made and just make me repeat them again because you cant acknowledge you have been defeated.
the man-spider movies have HORRIBLE plot lines,especially the first one.that whole thing of -you want to know who I ma,you sure you want to know was retarded,something i would expect out of a 5 year old.other than JJ jameson and uncle ben and aunt maye and peter,there was no in depth personalitys to the characters,unlike the first tow superman movies the supporting characters werent even developed.the character development to people like betty brant,robbie robertson ,harry osborn and mary jane and flash thompson key supporting characters was horrible,mary jane acting like gwen stacy instead,spiderman not being funny.the first season of the 90's toon the characters were MUCH better developed with much better plot lines and storys.but like i said,after that,the first season it went down hill from there with just a few good episodes here and there.
__________________
Last edited by Mr Parker on Nov 25th, 2006 at 06:38 PM
prove it.thats just all heresay on your part. hate to break the news to you but you have failed to prove me wrong in ANY of your posts where i on the other hand have proved you wrong countless of times.that would be you who is trying to find some pathetic loop hole in my reasoning and clinging to that for dear life.your the one that has yet to make any valid points. you want to call someone a troll,then you need look no further than in the mirror.I now remember why I initially put you on my ignore list years ago.I thought by the way you had conducted yourself in the batman section when batman begins came out that you might have grown up since then,obviously I was wrong since your back to your old childish insulting ways and name calling again.time to put you back on ignore again.no wonder your ex friend in real life spidergrl isnt friends with you anymore,easy to understand why.
__________________
Last edited by Mr Parker on Nov 25th, 2006 at 06:49 PM
if you want to believe the insane ramblings of yours proved me wrong on any of my points and that makes you feel better,then go on living in your own little fantasy world believing that.
thanks again for once AGAIN proving you lack any common sense or logic whatsoever.YOUR last post to me before you ran off and started posting again recently was way back on june 6th.YOU took practically 5 months before coming back and deciding to address my point yet here you are saying I got nothing else to say for not coming back immediately like you want me to.some of us dont get on the computer everyday and when we do,some of us dont venture into the spiderman section because of idiotic statements like this.once again the rolling of the eyes is because of idiotic statments like this.you fail to use any reason or common sense that I just might not have ventured into the spiderman section the few times I got on the computer withing the last week because it obviously did not occur to you that I might possibly not come to KMC that much anymore these days and the few times I do,I dont venture into the spiderman section much these days because of stupid comments like this. have fun talking to yourself,your back on my ignore list again.I really get tired of shooting down your weak and laughable arguments all the time and forcing me te repeat the answer to you again because you choose not to read it or if you did,you didnt remember the answer givent you and you just repeat it again.its annoying having to repeat the answers to you when you keep bringing up the same points all the time that were already addressed.
__________________
Last edited by Mr Parker on Nov 25th, 2006 at 07:09 PM
OK the first time I saw this tread I thought WTF?!. I mean the movies were great. Some characters weren't exacly as they are in the comic, so what ( I think we all know that no adaptation is perfect) The movie is called Spider-Man and IMO Spidey was acurate (not counting the lack of humor but I can live with it) and the organic webs are better because not everybody reads Spider-Man like my parrents, they don't know he has web shooters they only know he has webs, if they saw Peter making web shooters they would think it's pointles it's more realistic for Spider-Man to have organic webs (since he's Spider-man and spiders have webbing) and besides didn't Spidey get organic webs in the comics? Also about the costumes, GG's suit looks bad but what did you expect it was created for the army (last time I checked they don't wear latex suits). Mr. Parker and bakerboy's arguments are pathetic what is important is to make a good movie with a good story and characters not 100% accurate and like I said not everyone reads Spider-Man. Also the only real problems I saw was the lack of trash talk by Spidey and Mary-jane. I mean MJ is an idiotic character anyway add Dunst's horrible looks and terrible acting and you get one nasty combination. And compared to movies like Superman Returns and Elektra, Spider-Man deserves all the awards in the world. AND EVERY ONE I KNOW LIKES THE MOVIES (even my mom which is no comic fan). So it isn't Man-Spider it's Spider-Man.
P.S. If you don't like the movies don't watch the not waste my time with your whining.
Can't we all just agree to disagree? Maybe we could rename the thread to "I Dislike the Spider-Man Movies" (please, for the love of God, minus the Man-Spider! We get it, already!), and only those that identify with the title can come in here?
For the last time , i want to clear something for some idiots, MR PARKER AND MYSELF ARENT THE SAME PERSON. Im sick of that stupid thing that the man spider crew are posting again and again and again. DONT YOU BELIEVE ME? GO AND ASK FOR THE MODERATORS TO CHECK OUR PM ADRESSES AND YOU WILL SEE IT. What a bunch of morons.
And about man spider 3? it will be the same crap than man spider 1 aka the power ranger vs the unnfunny freak with organics and man spider 2 aka good guy controlled by tentacles vs unnfunny freak with organics. Same stupid organics, same stupid or more stupid goblin costume, mary jane being like gwen, gwen being like mary jane, spidey not funny, sandman as uncle ben killer( hoorray for raimi, one spiderman mith more destroyed), topher grace as venom, etc. Same old garbage that the man spider crew will see in cinema because there are some guy with a spiderman costume on screen, not matter about the spiderman mithos.
__________________ The beatles, best group ever.
John Lennon, Musical genius of all time
Helen Mirren and Julie Christie , most lovely british actresses of all time.
I don't remember saying you and Mr. Parker are the same person. And what's you're problem if you don't like the movies don't watch them. Even people who don't like comics like the movies. And as for the webbing it would seem weird for a kid to do something that synthetic designers have been unable to do for years. Also Spider-Man grossed $114,844,116 on the opening weekend. Spider-Man earned $783,964,497. It seems you and Mr. Parker are the only ones who have any real problems with the movies.
Do you live in a cave or something like that? There are hundred of persons who disliked those movies. Press and normal people. So, stop that bullshit of mr parker and me being the only ones to hate those movies.
I dont remember if you said that, but a lot of people here are posting again and againt it, what is very boring and annoying, beasides of a lie.
Webbing would be weird in a superhero movie with heroes and villains and super powers and sandman and venom and goblins and doctor octopus? Give me a break.
__________________ The beatles, best group ever.
John Lennon, Musical genius of all time
Helen Mirren and Julie Christie , most lovely british actresses of all time.
I remember saying him and Parker AND WhiteRat are the same. You wanna know why? Because they are. No one would join Spartacus-Boy's war against Spider-Man movies, so he made his own army.
I guess that's a "no" to my previous, peaceful request then eh?
KMC Community Forums
Nov 23rd, 2006 02:21 AM
your arguments are laughable and as stupid as always because there are several things in these man-spider movies that are far more rediculous and more stupid than chemical webbing. 
I already addressed them,go back and read through them because Im not going to repaet it again since you chose to ignore that laughable and lame argument you have against the chemical webbing.you man-spider fans always shoot yourselfs in the foot with that laughable statement that the webshooters are fantasy crap.dont know how to break the news to you but THE WHOLE THING OF SPIDER-MAN IS FANTASY and a guy getting the powers to cling to walls,get super human strength ect from a spiderbite is even more rediculous and fantasy than a kid genious creating a fluid.better luck next time in your wild insane arguments against the webshooters. 
got news for you,sony and raimi did not put hard work into it.just like tim burton did not put hard work into making a batman movie,christopher nolan and the screenwriter for batman begins on the other hand DID put hard work into making a batman movie.
