KillerMovies - Movies That Matter!

REGISTER HERE TO JOIN IN! - It's easy and it's free!
Home » Community » General Discussion Forum » Philosophy Forum » Prove to me that 2+2 does not = 4

Prove to me that 2+2 does not = 4
Started by: whobdamandog

Forum Jump:
Post New Thread    Post A Reply
Pages (34): « First ... « 27 28 [29] 30 31 » ... Last »   Last Thread   Next Thread
Author
Thread
shaynebmxxx
The mighty Techno Viking

Gender: Male
Location: 480

soo i heard that some indians (native) found out that if you take 2 strings with 2 knots on each then you tie them together you end up 5 knots.. soo that means 2 + 2 equals 5 right there..


__________________
Do not dwell in the past, do not dream of the future, concentrate the mind on the present moment."-Buddha"

Old Post Sep 2nd, 2007 03:44 PM
shaynebmxxx is currently offline Click here to Send shaynebmxxx a Private Message Find more posts by shaynebmxxx Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
LatinoStallion
Perfection

Gender: Male
Location: Paradise

I can prove that 1+1=3.



One man and one woman have sex. The woman gets pregnant and gives birth to a child.


The summation of two people has ended up in a result of three.


HHeheeeeee big grin


__________________

Old Post Sep 2nd, 2007 03:52 PM
LatinoStallion is currently offline Click here to Send LatinoStallion a Private Message Find more posts by LatinoStallion Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
jinXed by JaNx
Senior Member

Gender: Male
Location: Pittsburgh

prove to me that 2+2 does =4

wait, better yet, prove to me that black really isnt white


__________________
"If you tell the truth, you never have to remember anything" -Twain
(sig by Scythe)

Old Post Sep 11th, 2007 02:21 AM
jinXed by JaNx is currently offline Click here to Send jinXed by JaNx a Private Message Find more posts by jinXed by JaNx Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Creshosk
Senior Member

Gender: Male
Location:

quote: (post)
Originally posted by SpearofDestiny
I can prove that 1+1=3.



One man and one woman have sex. The woman gets pregnant and gives birth to a child.


The summation of two people has ended up in a result of three.


HHeheeeeee big grin
That'd be 1+1=r, where r is a random integer.

Twins... triplets... etc etc... sextuplets


And yes, even negative numbers count.


__________________

Old Post Sep 11th, 2007 05:21 AM
Creshosk is currently offline Click here to Send Creshosk a Private Message Find more posts by Creshosk Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
It's xyz!
Restricted

Gender: Male
Location: Made you look

Account Restricted

This thread is stupid.


__________________

Bulbasaur, the original... Pepe.

Last edited by Raz on Jan 1st 2000 at 00:00AM

Old Post Sep 11th, 2007 09:48 PM
It's xyz! is currently offline Click here to Send It's xyz! a Private Message Find more posts by It's xyz! Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
debbiejo
Dreamer

Gender: Unspecified
Location:

It's all perception.

Old Post Sep 16th, 2007 05:14 PM
debbiejo is currently offline Find more posts by debbiejo Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Symmetric Chaos
Fractal King

Gender: Male
Location: Ko-ro-ba

quote: (post)
Originally posted by lord xyz
This thread is stupid.


But at least it inspires people to try being clever.


__________________



Graffiti outside Latin class.
Sed quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
A juvenal prank.

Old Post Sep 17th, 2007 12:16 PM
Symmetric Chaos is currently offline Click here to Send Symmetric Chaos a Private Message Find more posts by Symmetric Chaos Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Shakyamunison
Nam Myoho Renge Kyo

Gender: Male
Location: Southern Oregon, Looking at you.

quote: (post)
Originally posted by Symmetric Chaos
But at least it inspires people to try being clever.


Most people don't really understand what was meant by the thread question.


__________________

Old Post Nov 5th, 2007 09:26 PM
Shakyamunison is currently offline Click here to Send Shakyamunison a Private Message Find more posts by Shakyamunison Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Bardock42
Junior Member

Gender: Unspecified
Location: With Cinderella and the 9 Dwarves

quote: (post)
Originally posted by whobdamandog
Math is generally referred to as an "Objective Truth" in science.
Objective meaning.."absolute" in its existence or beginning.
By faith alone..numbers used to determine the results of simple equations are assumed to be 100 percent constant. "Constant" meaning..they represent "absolute" values...and are not subject to change.

There are some, however, who believe that everything in life is made up of "Relative Truths." Relative meaning..everything is subject to change, and truth is dependant upon an individual's circumstances/views.

Those of you who believe in "Relative Truths." Please provide for me an explanation..as to how the mathmetical equation.

2 + 2 = 4

Is a relative truth.

**You may not make any "absolute" arguments to prove this relative truth, doing such.. would be contradictory to your position.
I am not sure who doesn't believe in absolute truths at all. I certainly quite desperately do.

The matter of the fact though is that, 2+2 = 4 is defined in multiple systems like that. It's just a matter of definition.

You define 1 and 0 and then call "1+1" "2" and "1+1+1+1" "4" and "1+1+1+1" is defines as the same as "1+1" + "1+1". It's rather simple counting.

And assuming we exist, assuming we can define and assuming most things are the way they seem to us, that is an absolute truth. Not that we can ever be sure, now can we?


__________________

Old Post Nov 5th, 2007 09:33 PM
Bardock42 is currently offline Click here to Send Bardock42 a Private Message Find more posts by Bardock42 Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Captain King
Jim Profit

Gender: Unspecified
Location: United States

This is because most people are stupid.

Not everything is absolute
Not everything is subjective


It's absolute to say that, but it's also subjective. Because what I think is absolute today, might be subjective tommorow, what I find to be subjective tommorow I might find to be absolute next-week.


Only the sith think in absolutes. And even "subjectivists" are guilty of thinking in absolutes. If they admit everything is subjective, then that in itself is an absolute.


I'm more inclined to be annoyed with moral subjectivists then absolutists. Because if morality is subjective, then pain is subjective. There is no moral reason not to just jump someone and rape them to death. Other then the ramifications of socio-justice. But then, why would they be upset? Is everyone else just ignorant of the moral subjectivity of my actions? How convient for the moral subjectivist victim I just raped to death...


Nothing aggarvates me more about others then the fact they think i'm as stupid as they are. I'm no friggin Plato, and neither are they.

Old Post Nov 17th, 2007 09:17 PM
Captain King is currently offline Click here to Send Captain King a Private Message Find more posts by Captain King Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
It's xyz!
Restricted

Gender: Male
Location: Made you look

Account Restricted

I see morality as an intelligent thing. Dumb acts are considered immoral to me, because they're dumb and only bad comes out of it.


__________________

Bulbasaur, the original... Pepe.

Last edited by Raz on Jan 1st 2000 at 00:00AM

Old Post Nov 18th, 2007 09:37 AM
It's xyz! is currently offline Click here to Send It's xyz! a Private Message Find more posts by It's xyz! Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
dadudemon
Senior Member

Gender: Male
Location: Bacta Tank.

quote: (post)
Originally posted by lord xyz
I see morality as an intelligent thing. Dumb acts are considered immoral to me, because they're dumb and only bad comes out of it.


Absolute statements can be proven to not be absolute....

For example...being dumb or doing dumb things is not always bad.

If an old lady, who needs to exercise but she forgets that she just turned off the stove, gets up and walks to the kitchen to turn off the stove only to find it turned off...is only in a better disposition than she began with because she was able to gain a bit of physical activity improving her health. of course,the butter fly effect can be applied to this scenario and you can say that she is able to live longer and an event that occurs with her causes a young person to change a little and later run for Presidency of the USA and this young person then becomes one of the best US presidents in history. Bla bla bla...and so forth.


__________________

Old Post Nov 19th, 2007 12:33 AM
dadudemon is currently offline Click here to Send dadudemon a Private Message Find more posts by dadudemon Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
kamhal
Senior Member

Gender: Male
Location: Planet Earth

quote:
(1) X=Y
(2) X2 = XY
(3) X2 - Y2 = XY-Y2
(4) (X+Y) (X-Y) = Y(X-Y)
(5) X+Y = Y
(6) 2Y = Y
(7) 4 = 2

Therfore 2 + 2 = 8


The step 2 has a flaw. You can't presume that the double of a number is this same number multiplied by himself. Example: 3*2=6 yet 3*3=9, or 1*2=2 yet 1*1=1 (and go on).

Actually i know that it can be mathematically proved that 1+1 is not =2, yet i put aside math by quite some time and i would have to look in a big and scary pille of dusty books laughing

Old Post Nov 20th, 2007 06:40 PM
kamhal is currently offline Click here to Send kamhal a Private Message Find more posts by kamhal Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
dadudemon
Senior Member

Gender: Male
Location: Bacta Tank.

quote: (post)
Originally posted by kamhal
The step 2 has a flaw. You can't presume that the double of a number is this same number multiplied by himself. Example: 3*2=6 yet 3*3=9, or 1*2=2 yet 1*1=1 (and go on).

Actually i know that it can be mathematically proved that 1+1 is not =2, yet i put aside math by quite some time and i would have to look in a big and scary pille of dusty books laughing

Dude...I think that is supposed to be

X^2


that is why I didn't question it...it is hard to do superscript...I guess.


__________________

Old Post Nov 21st, 2007 01:43 AM
dadudemon is currently offline Click here to Send dadudemon a Private Message Find more posts by dadudemon Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Bardock42
Junior Member

Gender: Unspecified
Location: With Cinderella and the 9 Dwarves

quote: (post)
Originally posted by dadudemon
Dude...I think that is supposed to be

X^2


that is why I didn't question it...it is hard to do superscript...I guess.
Have to reconsider.


Oh right, have it. You divide by 0 between step 4 and 5.


__________________

Last edited by Bardock42 on Nov 21st, 2007 at 02:04 PM

Old Post Nov 21st, 2007 01:57 PM
Bardock42 is currently offline Click here to Send Bardock42 a Private Message Find more posts by Bardock42 Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
It's xyz!
Restricted

Gender: Male
Location: Made you look

Account Restricted

quote:
(1) X=Y
(2) X2 = XY
(3) X2 - Y2 = XY-Y2
(4) (X+Y) (X-Y) = Y(X-Y)
(5) X+Y = Y
(6) 2Y = Y
(7) 4 = 2

Therfore 2 + 2 = 8


quote: (post)
Originally posted by kamhal
The step 2 has a flaw. You can't presume that the double of a number is this same number multiplied by himself. Example: 3*2=6 yet 3*3=9, or 1*2=2 yet 1*1=1 (and go on).

Actually i know that it can be mathematically proved that 1+1 is not =2, yet i put aside math by quite some time and i would have to look in a big and scary pille of dusty books laughing
WRONG!

(4) (X+Y) (X-Y) = Y(X-Y)
(5) X+Y = Y

Here is where it messes up. X = Y. So lets assume X = 2.

(4) (2+2) (2-2) = 2(2-2) Which is saying:
(4) 4 * 0 = 2 * 0 It then tells you that it proves
(5) 4 = 2, but that could be said about any number.

4*0=94949239294524814571*0 Therefore 4=94949239294524814571

But any number times by 0 = 0, so it's basically saying X is a number, and so is 2X, but they're not the same number, obviously.

quote: (post)
Originally posted by Bardock42
Have to reconsider.


Oh right, have it. You divide by 0 between step 4 and 5.
No you don't divide by zero between step 4 and 5, you idiot.


__________________

Bulbasaur, the original... Pepe.

Last edited by Raz on Jan 1st 2000 at 00:00AM

Old Post Nov 24th, 2007 12:49 PM
It's xyz! is currently offline Click here to Send It's xyz! a Private Message Find more posts by It's xyz! Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Bardock42
Junior Member

Gender: Unspecified
Location: With Cinderella and the 9 Dwarves

quote: (post)
Originally posted by lord xyz

No you don't divide by zero between step 4 and 5, you idiot.


A-actually you do.

X = Y => X-Y = 0

You just said what I said, but in less mathematical terms.


__________________

Old Post Nov 24th, 2007 02:53 PM
Bardock42 is currently offline Click here to Send Bardock42 a Private Message Find more posts by Bardock42 Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
It's xyz!
Restricted

Gender: Male
Location: Made you look

Account Restricted

quote: (post)
Originally posted by Bardock42
A-actually you do.

X = Y => X-Y = 0

You just said what I said, but in less mathematical terms.
Where do you divide by zero?


__________________

Bulbasaur, the original... Pepe.

Last edited by Raz on Jan 1st 2000 at 00:00AM

Old Post Nov 24th, 2007 06:49 PM
It's xyz! is currently offline Click here to Send It's xyz! a Private Message Find more posts by It's xyz! Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Bardock42
Junior Member

Gender: Unspecified
Location: With Cinderella and the 9 Dwarves

(4) (X+Y) (X-Y) = Y(X-Y)
(5) X+Y = Y

How do you think you get rid of the (X-Y)? And X-Y in the real numbers is 0. You can't do that.


__________________

Old Post Nov 24th, 2007 06:56 PM
Bardock42 is currently offline Click here to Send Bardock42 a Private Message Find more posts by Bardock42 Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
It's xyz!
Restricted

Gender: Male
Location: Made you look

Account Restricted

quote: (post)
Originally posted by Bardock42
(4) (X+Y) (X-Y) = Y(X-Y)
(5) X+Y = Y

How do you think you get rid of the (X-Y)? And X-Y in the real numbers is 0. You can't do that.
Ah yes, ofcourse.

Well, what's the link between 3 and 4?


__________________

Bulbasaur, the original... Pepe.

Last edited by Raz on Jan 1st 2000 at 00:00AM

Last edited by It's xyz! on Nov 24th, 2007 at 07:32 PM

Old Post Nov 24th, 2007 07:27 PM
It's xyz! is currently offline Click here to Send It's xyz! a Private Message Find more posts by It's xyz! Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
All times are UTC. The time now is 07:58 PM.
Pages (34): « First ... « 27 28 [29] 30 31 » ... Last »   Last Thread   Next Thread

Home » Community » General Discussion Forum » Philosophy Forum » Prove to me that 2+2 does not = 4

Email this Page
Subscribe to this Thread
   Post New Thread  Post A Reply

Forum Jump:
Search by user:
 

Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is OFF
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON

Text-only version
 

< - KillerMovies.com - Forum Archive - Forum Rules >


© Copyright 2000-2006, KillerMovies.com. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by: vBulletin, copyright ©2000-2006, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.