The point is, if you didn't clarify in your first post whether it was based on stats or perceived ability, then its fair game to use stats as an argument. You
__________________
Greg Oden: The future of the Blazers. The future of the NBA.
Whoops. I deleted my 2nd paragraph earlier but apparently left the "You". Even though it wasn't what I was originally going to say, lets just for shits and giggles finish that sentence with "...f*ck!"
__________________
Greg Oden: The future of the Blazers. The future of the NBA.
a lot like wuta when it comes to answering back to me...he obviously has nothing bad to say about the nets with solid facts and proof. all he can say is that they suck....i could say the same about everything he says but whenever i respond to his posts i make a point. and he tells me i dont understand logic? lol.
you know i was joking when i said vince is better, right? wade is better. he basically won the championship for miami. he should not have gotten the mvp, he should have gotten ovp, "only valuable player." believe me, i watched every minute of the finals, and i was rooting for dallas big time unfortunately cause i hate miami. miami was seriously dead in the water, but every last second of every game, wade somehow finds a way to make the game winning play. after dallas lost game 5, i almost cried. they have some stupid motto "15 strong" which is bull. half of active roster doesnt even play, and if it wasnt for wade's heroics, the mavs would have swept them, yes, it is undeniable.
I think MVP is still more accurate. Zo was a defensive beast. GP hit some big shots here and there. Shaq wasn't playing like Shaq, but you can't say he held no value in the finals. And the rest of the team didn't play horrible as well. Wade was the key component and had it not been for him, the Heat would have lost, but he didn't do it all by himself.
Other than that, your point is very valid and I agree that he is better than Vince.
__________________
Greg Oden: The future of the Blazers. The future of the NBA.