Gender: Male Location: between apathy and indifference
What is more interesting is the different debating skills used in this forum that can be equally effective.
For example, some people look at some of PVS's posts and just react to some of the hostility or jokes and ignore some of the common sense or information that is the root of the post.
Other people overlook some of the excellent posts that Bardock has made and chosen to focus on his sarcasm.
Some people pick appart VVD's grammar instead of reading his well thought out posts that deftly support his arguements.
Different approaches and all can be effective.
__________________ "I made a typo bif deal" - JacopeX
Last edited by KharmaDog on Jan 9th, 2006 at 08:23 PM
I'll just point out that nobody has successfully picked apart VVD's grammar. I don't believe it's possible to, unless he accidentally makes a typo.
Whob has tried a few times...
I agree with most of what you said though. I am of the belief that if you lace a post with blatant hostility you can't really complain about the root being overlooked, but as much as we disagree, PVS has more sense than most of the current dwellers.
VVD and AC melds...There must be something very special there...AC seems to always mention VVD's posts..........Whoa....What is it with special relationships.....LOL.......Hmmmm attraction........Like Water boy......
Hahaha, good luck dude. Though I didn't challenge you, I was just stating the obvious. Whob has tried and failed. The only time VVD would have any lapse in grammar is if it's intended. He is never unintentionally wrong.
Hahaha, we happen to know each other but rest assured, there's absolutely no "special" anything there. Anything but. I was just merely pointing out that he has flawless grammar because he does. Who am I to deny that? I'd say the same of anyone else. His zest for applying me to humourous circumstance (even if only for his own benefit) aside, I'm not about to deny anyone anything.
Arguments in the GDF about assisted suicide, the death penalty, abortion, the nature of homosexuality, evolution etcetera with Joes Nobody are as equally inconsequential. The skills and relevancy of posters is also at times questionable.
If you're looking for exemplary debating skills, KMC isn't the best place in the world to start.
Why must you mention him in relation to your views.?? I wonder..Is is insecurity and need a side Kick....No one else mentions others when it comes to their views....just wondering...
Gender: Male Location: between apathy and indifference
I don't see anyone thinking that VVD is AC's sidekick. Although I do agree AC often seems to look for acceptance from VVD, I do know there is not much love between them.
Go fishing for better examples Debbie, you're crapping out with this one.
__________________ "I made a typo bif deal" - JacopeX
Hahaha, acceptance from VVD. Funny. He's the last person I'll look for acceptance from. I know him in real life and there are a great many times, most infact, that I wish I did not.
Because KharmaDog humourously mentioned him, so I tagged something onto that (it was relevant) and you chose to remain in idiot mode as you always do. Once again dragging things to where they needn't be. Now, I don't wanna have to report you a fourth time.
KMC Community Forums
Jan 9th, 2006 08:09 PM
...i think 
