There only linked in the fact that a boy is the same sex as a grown man, I would say Homosexuals Find Men attractive, Not small boys, In the same way Straight people Find Women attractive, Not small girls.
What your proposing is that Homosexuals Find Men attractive so they must find Boys attractive. I seriously Doubt a Homosexual would bed a man if he found out he was below the age of consent, Where as a Nambla Member seeks out ONLY those below the age of consent.
Saying hello and joking is one thing, Trying to bed someone below the age of consent is another, Personally I wouldn't go near anything below the age of 17.
Though I would ask, Are all your comic-book groupies above this age???
thou Should I not say hello to any of the new members? And posting in the OTF doesn't quailfy me as a sex thread addict...
a man who rapes a little boy is a homosexual
and a man who raped a little girl is a heterosexual.
is that it? for whob it seems to be...but anyone else? no? ok how about this:
homosexuality is a mental disorder related to paedophelia. more 'advanced' homosexuals progress to raping children. men who rape little girls are in fact homosexual, just that they have advanced even farther than the standard peadophile.
is that the brown nugget you're trying to dig up? please enlighten me.
please. decode the speech, and say what you mean. because this is getting stale.
Gender: Male Location: The Fortress, North Pole with Santa
Account Restricted
It's legal at 16 and you're what 19 thats OK surely as low as 15, At 19 I knew 15 year old girls a bit.
QUOTE=6026722]Originally posted by Hit_and_Miss Though I would ask, Are all your comic-book groupies above this age??? [/QUOTE]
The comic book forum has probably the oldest membership on a regular basis and also probably the youngest except for Video games and Anime which are also very young.
QUOTE=6026722]Originally posted by Hit_and_Miss thou Should I not say hello to any of the new members?[/QUOTE]
Of course not
QUOTE=6026722]Originally posted by Hit_and_Miss And posting in the OTF doesn't quailfy me as a sex thread addict... [/QUOTE]
Well most of them in the OTF do seem to be obsessed by sex
__________________
herd behavior is a comical thing - Thanks Silver Spider
It took you more than a post to figure that out...
Yes..but he's not on the same level of perversion as the homosexual paedophile..at least according to nature.
ie: nature = "male + female" not "man + man"
Well you forgot to mention that there are different levels to "obscenity", some "obscene" behavior..is far more perverse than others.
ie: A man who rapes a 2 year old, is much more "perverse" than a man who rapes a 20 year old.
Often times it is..did you even read the wiki article about NAMBLA..it was founded by a division of a "Gay Rights" group. Believe it or not, it's actually supported by various segments of the gay community to this day.
I wouldn't say more "advanced", I would say more "perverse..." Either way..they're both perverted to some degree, however, not on the same level.
Never stated that..now you're just making stuff up bud..
For obvious reasons mentioned throughout this thread, some paedophiles..are clearly more perverted than others.
I don't think anyone can enlighten you PVS..I've already attempted to rationalize with you for over 20 pages..and it still hasn't gotten through your head that a society assigns different "degrees" to perversion and obscenity. If you didn't learn that by the age of 18, then you'll never be able to understand it.
Repeat:
One can't apply "Relativism" to various obscene acts. Some acts are obviously more perverse than others.
__________________ If knowledge is power..how come we have so many idiots in charge?!!
Last edited by whobdamandog on Feb 22nd, 2006 at 01:10 PM
aww but why not whob? this way you can just blame all paedophelia on the queers. you are not very good at scapegoating, though you do put in your best effort. research the scapegoating tactics of jerry falwell, and you will be yet closer to mastering the art of connecting irrelevant issues and making an ass out of yourself.
Gender: Male Location: between apathy and indifference
According to nature? When did you go out and interview nature? Have you spent any time at all studying nature or even going outside and experienceing and learning about nature.
This argument against homosexuality is one of the worst. Homosexuality occurs often in nature. SO if it happens in nature, then it is a natural occurance.
Homosexuality has been observed in Bonobo chimps, Gorillas, Bottlenosed dolphins, Japanese Macaques,Sheep, Lions, Birds ,and many other creatures.
Here are some references if you choose to research it:
Bagemihl, B. (1999). Biological exuberance: animal homosexuality and natural diversity. New York, NY: St. Martin’s Press
Bama, L. (1997, February). Macho rams “take a walk on the wild side”. High Country News, 29, 2.
Kluger, J. (1999, April). The gay side of nature. Time Magazine, 25-27.
Phillips, H. (2002). Homosexuality is biological, suggests gay sheep study. Retrieved April 2, 2003, from htttp://www.newscientist.com/news
Vasey, P.L., Chapais, B., & Gathier, C. (1998). Mounting interactions between female Japanese Macaques: testing the influence of dominance and aggression. Ethology, 104, 387-398.
Weiten, W. (2001). Psychology themes and variations (5th ed.). United States: Thompson Learning, Inc.
__________________ "I made a typo bif deal" - JacopeX
Gender: Male Location: The Fortress, North Pole with Santa
Account Restricted
The Gay sheep were a Welsh recombinant DNA experimant I believe, for the purposes of shipping to New Zealand where lonely men will find them highly useful. Although both the Welsh and New Zealanders like heterosexual sheep also, I believe (allegedly). After all Cardiff does have Castle Cock!
__________________
herd behavior is a comical thing - Thanks Silver Spider
Well from what I can gather, in the US and many other countries, the law has different categories of rape. I believe rape involving "sodomy", sexual intercourse through penetration of the anus, carries a greater sentence than rape which involves vaginal intercourse.
If no penetration is involved, I believe the sexual offense is usually classified as molestation, which carries a lesser penalty than rape..correct me if I'm wrong however.
And let's not forget, often times one's punishment is also based on the amount of times they've commited the offense.
So in a nutshell...it all really depends on the type of "rape" one has commited, and the circumstances involved when they commited said offense.
From a social perspective, I believe many societies tend to give harsher penalties to men who sexually abuse young boys, as opposed to those who sexually abuse young girls. It's kind of like being doubly perverse..not only are you engaging in sexual relations with someone who isn't physically mature, but you're also going against what most deem to be the predominant "coupling" of the sexes within nature.
__________________ If knowledge is power..how come we have so many idiots in charge?!!
Last edited by whobdamandog on Feb 23rd, 2006 at 12:43 AM
KMC Community Forums
By Barker
Feb 21st, 2006 01:43 PM
I was in the off topic and my Spider sense tingled because some one said sex in here.
