Erm technically, he wasn't. The ancient sith were a race. Exar Kun was a human, not a sith And the thing is, there are many ways of looking at who the ancient sith were, but the only problem is that the creator of this thread makes it clear that he doesn't put Exar Kun in that catagory.
Exar Kun was the last DLOTS/Sith Lord of the ancient ways, therefore he was the last of the ancients. And I didn't read that the creator had included Kun so um..
Dude, you still don't get it. the ancient sith were not a religion, cult, organisation, order or anything like that. It refers to the race, nothing else. You can't just change the meaning of the title so it suits what you said (which was foolish and wrong) when the creator of the thread makes it clear that he is taking the more general and technical meaning of ancient sith.
Hence Kamikz good explanation. Technically Exar Kun was an ancient sith, now if the author the ancient sith from GAOTS and before, then that's more clear..
1. Exar wasn't an ancient...no more than Darth Ruin or Revan
2. Exar was hardly the last before Bane's Order, Kamikz...there was Revan, Malak, the Triumvirate, Darth Ruin, Belia Darzu, Darth Rivan, Kaan, the
What, because he was crowned by tha ancients and learnt sith magic? You seriously can't be more wrong. Just accpet it: in general the term 'Ancient Sith' refers to the race, and the creator of this thread makes it quite clear that he is taking that general meaning. You're just plain wrong td.
Listen troll if the creator said that then more power to him, if he didn't then the term itself can be interpreted in 1 or 2 ways. Now as I told you before, you need to have a triple digit IQ to type to me, so please refrain from doing so. I don't associate with mentally handicapped/unstable children.
You clearly don't know jack.
You can't just take your own interpretation of the meaning of the term 'Ancient Sith' in this thread and place it above ours', especially considering that our interpretation of the meaning of the term is the general term and clearly the creator of the thread's interpreatation of the meaning, whilst yours' is just foolish.
And believe it or not, it seems that the last force-user to learn sith magic to our knowledge is in fact Lumiya. Not sure about the new sith order in Legacy.
Are you retarded? Do you understand the concept of Ancient Sith? Yes the main definition is clearly Ancient Sith. But theoretically Nadd and Kun were the last ones to learn from the ancient sith, be initiated by the ancient sith, etc, thereby making them the last of the ancient sith lords.
The thing is, you've already made clear that you're above 18 years old, while I'm midway through highschool, so you would be expected to seem slightly more intelligent than I am. The thing is, you're not so I really wouldn't be talking about IQs if I were you.
Judging by all of your posts, and considering the fact that you wouldn't know intelligence if it hit you over the head, I don't take your opinion seriously..
Last to learn from the ancient sith? lmao, I would seriously recommend reading Evil Never Dies: The Sith Dynasties td, seriously. And as I have said, Lumiya was the last. And palpatine was accepted and kinda crowned by the ancients IIRC, and he learnt ancient sith teachings so using your logic, wouldn't that make him an ancient sith.
No, because there's a 4,000+ year difference between the two. Notice how the ancient sith truly died with Exar Kun, and the only thing that was left was the sith ideal, and nothing else.. And stop calling me td, you've already humiliated yourself enough on this forum, I don't think you can afford to continue your stupidity.
The thing is, I sometimes make idiotic posts on purpose just to see the responce and hardly put that much effort into debating, while users like Mokoto will write essays in response to one statement. I think I already proved my intelligence by being the first to discover your identity, td.
Yes, on purpose. 100% of your posts have been on purpose, we really believe that. You've proven your stupidity which is why you get ridiculed. But your defense mechanism is apparent, troll.
I really don't see how calling you td is humiliating myself. You're lame. And stick to your argument dude, weren't you talking about sith teachings? It's funny how the moment I refute your argument, you completely change it and pretend that it was your arhument the whole time. Great way of debatinf td
Jul 18th, 2006 08:30 PM
