And you are going to use wikipedia as a good source of information? I don't know, may be you wrote that thing.
And yeah right they were also hiding in the airport, and on the bridges, in kindergardens and two houses Israel recently bombed, and you're going to buy all that? Again, there are over 1000 people died, 900 of them were civilians, others from army of lebanon and great minority from Hezbollah.
And i have reasons to believe that they are blood thirsty rapists and killers.
You tell me that I wont believe otherwise no matter of what, who's talking, you are buying every crap they say about accidently killing 900 people and terrorists hiding in the kindergardens. Take Palestine for example. Israel says: "those kids had bombs so we had to shoot them down" or "we killed those teenagers because they were terrorists" or "we bombed that village in respone for blah blah" but in reality everything Palestine does is a respone for what they did to them. What it takes you to understand that?
Yeah. like at the time when soldiers shot down two kid(both aroung ten) and said they had bombs, but no bombs were found. Like I said, 900 inocent people.
Great you accounted for 2 lost civilians now come up with the rest of the 898! My point is, its very difficult, there are innocent lives lost. However a known tactic in "war" is to hide your casualties to demoralize your enemy and strngth your backing by those sympathetic to your cause.
Accept the overtures of surrender from the Japanese, clarifying the U.S. stance on the Emperor, that they intended to allow the retention of the monarchy, knowing it would be a militarily strategically beneficial to do so.
A website if you're genuinely interested: http://www.ncesa.org/html/hiroshima.html
Although I'm doubting it.
My opinions are formed from the information available to me? What is your opinion of the current situation and how was it formed? My view is that the current Israeli offensive is too indiscriminate and disproportionate and will ultimately fail to achieve anything substantial other than further death on both sides and economic and humanitarian crises in Lebanon.
What is your opinion as to the longer term outcome of the current situation?
Those 2 was an example of what Israel says when they kill inocents, they always use cheap lies. Same here, they bombed houses kindergardens and bridges and said there were terrorists, but turned out they only killed inocent people, so now they are using cheap excuses.
It is not hard to find out what victims were from Hezbollah and what not.
So the US was not wrong, but was wrong... OK.... Believe what you like, neither of our views are original anyhow, for each historian, history book you pull to support your view, there’s another to contest it. So I guess I must be listening to the wrong people and reading the wrong books.
Don't you remember, I admitted to making grammatical errors and will continue to do so, but you selectively pointing them out in a vain attempt to bully people is pathetic, since of course not only am I the only one that does it, but you have made errors yourself, unless you see yourself as being perfect.
LOL, Ok, I'm a hypocrite, but refrain from dropping the knee jerk 'irony' bomb.
Super.
I'm sure I do... 'I know you are, but what am I!'
And I repeat, did I ever say "Everyone hates Israel." nor did I say or imply that all media is one sided and on the Lebanese side, as you quoted and claimed I did.
I'll give it a look... while being skeptical of the source.
My opinion is that Israel is doing what it can to protect itself, and that opinion was formed from information given to me while staying skeptical of that information.
Israel, and Hezbollah are fighting a fight without rules. Always in war there are deaths and economic crises. This is something you can always expect. But someone will achieve something, if you fight the fight in a manner of following no rules.
Unless you live in either Israel or Lebanon, then you cannot truly justify what Hezbollah and Israel have committed. You can neither blame either of them, for their influences are far beyond your and my comprehension. It all simply comes down to a matter of life and death.
What annoys me about all this is the biast news reporting. They go on about that its Hezbollahs fault because they started firing rockets at isreal.
But they only started that AFTER isreal started the bombing. Ok Hezbollah captured two Isreali soldiers which was daft and bound to piss Isreal off. But Isreal is holding THOUSANDS of Hezbollah people prisoner, not to mention a whole nation of Palastine.
I recon Isreal is the US´s long arm in the middle east, the same way Iran is using Lebanon as a remote attacking entity, the US is using Isreal.
Wow killing soldiers and kidnapping them is really ugly! Compared to shelling a Gaza beach full of civilians who were having a day out in the sea!
No it's far worse. Which is why Hezbollah retaliated by attacking soldiers NOT CIVILIANS like Israel did...
Out of all the stupid things I've read from you, i.e. Hezbollah launching rockets before Israel's first bombings, this one nails it. You really are a div. You mean most of these dead people and kids were most likely Hezbollah afterall? So you're saying we might as well kill everyone who moves, because they may be a Hezbollah militant afterall? I suppose in that case the red cross ambulances and the UN post were probably Hezbollah as well? Most of the deaths have been confirmed civilians you idiot by people in a better position to make said confirmation than you.
Go pour yourself a glass of milk and eat a pack of cookies, instead of posting crap, you little pratt.
__________________ I know what you're thinking punk. You're thinking: "Did he fire six shots or only five?" Well, to tell you the truth, I've forgotten myself in all this excitement. But being as this is a .44 Magnum, the most powerful handgun in the world, and would blow your head clean off, you've got to ask yourself a question: "Do I feel lucky?" Well, do ya punk?
You don't know much about wikipedia do you, 'quality control', the requirement to list sources, the fact that only longtime members of wikipedia can edit it currently, the huge list of citations and soruces that are at the bottom of the page? People that don't like what they read usually deny it's validity because they can't accept opposing facts.