So this is how your argument dies.. First Yoda knows only 1 form, then Yoda is NOT cleary teaching them a second form which is specifically stated.. So this means Yoda already knows 2 forms which destroys your argument completely..
And I'm glad that your word>Attack of the Clones..
If they call it Shii Cho you can argue with facts all you want, but you would still lose..
LOL it destroys my argument? I just gave you 2 links, now all of a sudden they aren't definitive enough for you.. They said Yoda is teaching Shii Cho so he is. The fact that you would argue with facts and not concede defeat is hilarious lightsnake. Your argument is over..
LOL because that's the only thing that helps your argument lightsnake. But I gave you two links, you can call them canon or not, it is widely stated that Yoda knows all the forms, I'm sure that exists in your little Sourcebook or NEC or whatever. You lose lightsnake, give it up and get back on topic of Ragnos.
Read your source books, read the links, and quit whining, you lost. The Ragnos old age thing will be solved soon as Anderzone emailed me back saying he will get Kevin Anderson to email me because he is busy right now.
Dont you think it's a little odd that a 900 year old Jedi Master only knows one form of lightsaber combat. Shii Cho is the first form of combat padwans learn so that proves he knew at least two.
You know how long I waited for Kevin to send his answers to me, you immature brat? Over a month. Anderzone told me 'sorry for the wait, Kevin was busy', that's it...how does that translate to 'not written by KJA?' Give me the name of a source, you little brat. I've given you the names of mine
It was SIGNED by Kevin, I kept checking back with them and they told me he got my questions. You know something, Tdtd? the hell with you. You're immature and a troll. You ride the coattails of people smarter than you and your main debate style consists of ad hominem. I've actually cited things published by LFL, I've read my soruces and I'm asking you TO PROVE THE **** UP. I'm telling you right here and now:
You give me the names of these sources, just the NAMES and I'll read them myself, or you forfeit right now. Sudden death, you don't get away from this. You tell me EXACTLY what I want or you concede this debate.
Who do you keep calling immature when its you who is the one constantly crying. Been Projecting much lightsnake?
Stop complaining ok? Your emails mean nothing to me, you have just the text showing, and then want people to take your word for the questions you asked, and the other answers given to you NOT in the email. You must live in your own little fantasy world, seeing as how once you lose an argument, I'm suddenly tdtd, riding smarter people's arguments(obviously not you since I wouldn't call you intelligent), and am a troll all of a sudden. Well lightsnake, I suggest you consult the Myriam-Webster's dictionary before spewing off vocabulary you have no concept of. I have already proven my case and you have made a fool of yourself constantly, now if you have nothing to add, shut up and let me and escape get back on topic, as you're becoming too much of a childish nuisance on this forum... "Troll".
Darth Sexy, get to my arguments or leave. You're acting as immature as Lightsnake is and only wish to piss him off.
Lightsnake, I understand you getting angry at him, but you're being as immature as he is and it isn't helping my debate at all with him. Especially if he gets locked in a petty argument with you instead of handling my debate, which is what I ultimately want.
Jul 14th, 2006 06:06 PM
