As I'm no engineering guru, I can't explain why it collapsed as it did. I can simply tell you that it did, and direct you to video of it doing so. I can also tell you that seismic records show there were no preset explosives at the scene, and there were no squibs present to indicate any went off.
__________________ In case we find ourselves starting to believe all the Anti-American sentiment and negativity, we should remember England 's Prime Minister Tony Blair's words during an interview. When asked by one of his Parliament members why he believes so much in America , he said:
"A simple way to take measure of a country is to look at how many want in... And how many want out."
Gender: Male Location: The sewers of the Big City!
Re: Re: Can someone please prove the official version of 911
Do you understand the notion of explaining, because it seems that everytime I ask you to post this is what you do. Debunking911 simply offers rebuttals to conspiracy claims, and I haven't made any claims about why the towers fell in this thread ffs.I'm asking you to explain the pancake collapse and the science behind it and how it's possible.
__________________ In case we find ourselves starting to believe all the Anti-American sentiment and negativity, we should remember England 's Prime Minister Tony Blair's words during an interview. When asked by one of his Parliament members why he believes so much in America , he said:
"A simple way to take measure of a country is to look at how many want in... And how many want out."
Okay I will take the word over a man I just met a week ago who HE brought up how corrupt the government is at work with me the other day, not me.He is a retired steel worker who says that there has never been a steel building collapse due to fire and that its impossible for an aluminum airplane to knock down a steel building.To just imiagine ramming a car into a brick building and see what happens.Its the same thing.He also says as well that it takes 3000 degrees to melt iron and the highest it ever got inside the towers was 2800 and it was for only 5 seconds.Also if you look at the video,the majority of the explosions of the aircrafts take place "outside" the building.The planes simply could not have caused the explosions.
__________________
Last edited by Mr Parker on Mar 20th, 2007 at 07:22 PM
Steel and iron are the same thing he says.Lukily he is here right now to tell me this.He also says as well that those buildings were built with the highest grade of steel when they were built.Also says as well that the fireproofing covering the steel was designed not to start cooling and melting until after 4 hours of temperatures at 5000 degrees before it starts cooloing and doing its job.I would get him on here to say this himself but he has poor typing skills.Says he has extremely slow typing skills.
__________________
Last edited by Mr Parker on Mar 20th, 2007 at 07:30 PM
My friend says that he saw George Bush plant the explosives inside the towers himself.
But he can't type well...
Are you serious, Parker? "WELL MY FRIEND SAID THAT"-- enough. I don't care who you met a week ago, and what he thinks or "knows" but unless he's a structural engineer who personally helped construct the towers, no one will take him seriously, ef he even exists at all.
Lol, steel and iron are NOT the same thing. Iron is in steel, but steel also contains carbon and is stronger thatn Iron.
That claim right there just completely makes you look stupid.
Even though you're on my ignore list I just couldn't resist.... oh my god you are so STUPID. YOU HAVE ABSOLUTELY NO SOURCES WHATSOEVER. You can't just say... "oh yeah I met this random guy last week and we started talking about 9/11 conspiracis all of the sudden." YOU ARE SO FULL OF SHIT.
And what the hell are you talking about... "luckily he's here right now to tell me this" as your typing... in your house?
Wait, what is he saying knocked down the buildings, the plane or the fire? Well, according to the official story, its the plane, the fire etc. combined.
Yeah, because Petrol can soften clay like burning jet fuel softens steel.
1. The official story says the steel did not melt.
2. The twin towers are made of steel. Iron is different to steel.
3. It did NOT only burn for 5 minutes.
4. It wasn't just one temperature, some parts were hotter than others which helped cause the metal to bend and weaken.
5. Iron's melting temperature is 2800F http://www.webelements.com/webeleme...xt/Fe/heat.html This is too obvious and too stupid to debunk.
KMC Community Forums
doesn't fit in with the context.
Mar 14th, 2007 04:25 PM
This is too obvious and too stupid to debunk.
