Parker. Please use paragraphs and grammar and fun things like that. It helps people read the crap you write, and they might have to pay a little more attention before they notice that you're talking absolute crap.
__________________
Thanks to Badwolf for the great sig!
not due to differing viewpoints, due to spouting wild assertions with no evidence to back them up, many times when there is already an over-abundance of evidence to debunk their fantasy before they even type it.
just look at the first page here:
- It was a conspiracy that Brandon and Bruce Lee both died. Really? There was no connection between the two deaths time, location, persons involved, manner of death, etc. It's just some off the wall wild assertion somebody decided to kill 5 minutes with by posting it on the internet.
- Moon landing was a hoax. Hmmmm. So this is a world-wide conspiracy? We announced our intentions to go to the moon 8 years prior. We announced the exact date of launch months prior.......yet China, Japan, England, Germany, RUSSIA, etc..........nobody was watching? They were just going to take our word for it? I guess one of those countries also harbor the secret magic mine that tons of moon rocks were excavated from. Every reason they give for believing a hoax causes one to laugh. Their reasons of belief are not based on anything other than their own ignorance about physics. Yet this shit gets posted on here.
- the WTC was a controlled demolition. That's what Parker and Deano post about. They say there are all kinds of "demolition experts" who back this claim yet have never given one as a source. I just got done googling this very subject. Not one credential to be found. Not one demolition master of any large demolition company or military expert has stated this that I can find. Since they don't list these sources, I'm guessing they both have the same source.........some construction worker in their town? yeah um....been 7 years now.....I'm sure one of these demolition masters would have said something on camera and it'd be on Youtube by now. Link it.
- Queen Elizabeth aswell as all heads of state for every nation on earth are shapeshifting lizard people from another planet. pretty much speaks for itself.
- JFK conspiracy. It has been re-enacted both physically and computer generated. The shots fired from Oswald's rifle match all wounds. Not just in computer models......with live ammo, bone and ballistics gelatin human substitutes. While there probably is a conspiracy to be found here as Oswald was assinated by Ruby, he was probably working for someone, these nuts are trying to find a conspiracy about the actual shots fired to wound inflicted, something that has been proven time and time again to hold true. The conspiracy would lie in who's interest Oswald was acting on......CIA, Cubans, etc. Why discuss that? It's too easy. Instead we're all going to discuss at great length second gunman and grass knolls even though every wound has already been accounted for by Oswald's shots.
it's not all conspiracy theorists. just the internet conspiracy theorists. I'm a conspiracy theorist myself. I believe there are a great many....that are real. These guys just make up crap off the top of their heads with no reason for believing so given. wild shit at that. Hell......Deano's whole "every head of state is a shapeshifting lizard alien" idea was taken from a soccer goalie. Not somebody in the know...ex CIA or MoD......a f-cking soccer player. When David Beckham declares he's actually a time traveller from the 26th century come back to save human kind, Deano will be posting about it adnaseum in this very forum. Parker will be there replying with "tell 'em Deano".
so yeah.... government officially denies knowledge of extraterrestrial life they know to be true, conspiracy. government conducts illegal covert opperations disavowing knowledge of it, conspiracy. Moon landing is a hoax, heads of state are giant lizard people with the ability to re-arrange the shape of their bones, muscles, skeletal and nervous systems aswell as the actual cellular structure of their epidermis at will........dumbass.
i genuinely believe that's one of the most dangerous ideas in the world because at its core it basically denies that there are islamist extremists that dont want to cause massive destruction to the western world
of course...any terrorist organisation worth their salt would claim to attack america in such a way that it would bring the entire might of the most powerful nation on earth as well as their allies down on their heads
believing they didn't...and using the most outlandish and conflicting and utterly fabricated of misinterpreted or out of context "evidence" is a far more rational explanation for what happened
first off,if you ever bothered to go back and read the posts of mine,katsu's,a guy named David something,emperor ashtars and Deano's, you would see where your wrong that we havent listed any sources.I have listed them countless times here I dont know how many times.I have referred people to david griffiths books many times where he lists those sources he talks about,not my fault you dont want to read the books I list here. I listed that canada wants the truth link too many times here,your going to have to go back and look in the past pages where I listed those sources. I get tired of repeating them just to have them go ignored cause you guys dont want to see it.all you got to do to see the truth besides reading Griffiths books is visit this site www.911truth.org also if you go to youtube.com and just type in -proof that explosives went off,you'll see videos there that CANT be debunked that explosives went off.plus I'll take the word of firefighters that were there that day who said in the oct 2002 edition I believe was the month-where they were quoted saying-The 9/11 commission was a half baked farce.Those guys had no interest in finding out the truth.I have put out buildings before where explosives went off.I know the difference between the sounds of a mere collapse of a building and explosives going off and those were explosives going off.Those people are a bunch of damn liars. sorry but I'll take the words of those firefighters published in that magazine over the loons that have come on here that desperately grasp at straws trying to disprove those people with the insane posts the always come back with.especially lord xyz and jadens.
as far as the moon landing?I havent done much research into that subject but I am open minded that that one they were telling the truth about.Da pittman brought up some good points on his thread which sways me into believing THAT one they were telling the truth about.Like I said on that thread,they got to tell the truth sometimes.this was probably one of the rare times they did.
shapeshifting lizards as people? well I think its safe to say only Deano here believes in that one. Dont lump people like me and batdude into that same group.
if you believe all that crap from the governments version that all shots from oswalds rifle match his wounds,then your seriously beyond help to be reasoned with.The first rifle they found on the sixth floor for instance was a model not even close to the one they say oswald owned with shell casings that did NOT match the manlicher carcanao.witnesses that were there that I have met over the years insist they saw a gunman from the grassy knoll fire a shot there,the photographs clearly back that up as well.they clearly show a gunman on the grassy knoll.witnesses who took photos that day were detained and harrassed by policemen and had their films confiscated.
Luckily some people were able to get out without having that happen to them cause again,the films clearly show at least one gunman on the grassy knoll. you also clearly dont know about Ed Hoffman the deaf mute who was there that day.He had a view from the overpass.an aeriel view of the whole thing.He swears he saw a gunman on the grassy knoll fire a shot then immediately pass it on to another person standing nearby him and that man,broke the gun down into small pieces and put it in his suitcase and walk away.which by the way,if you ever studied anything about the CIA,yopu would know thats how they are trained in assassinations when they pull them off.also,ask any vietnam veteran "Like I have" who participated in many kills in the vietnam war,and they will all tell you the warren commissions explanation that oswald got shot from behind is a joke because they know from experience in kills,that you shoot a guy in the back of the head,their head is going to go forward,not back.I spoke to one once and he said he never once saw a vietcongs head go forward when he shot them from the back.Thats how these vietnam veterans knew from the beginning back then that the warren commission was a fairy tale.
Thats also being plain ignorant to say that it wasnt a homegrown plot because the only people who had the power to make the army intelligence there stand down that day allowing open windows,people with umbrellas in the audience,ect ect and to make that triangular turn slowing the car down to 11 miles an hour a direct violation against secret service policy,is people in high positions of power within the government.one video ALSO shows one secret serviceman wanting to ride behind kennedy on the bumper of the car to protect him,only to be ordered off the car by a superiour obviously.That secret serviceman is seen in that video expressing his anger and outrage over that as well.For his protection to be relaxed like that,it could ONLY happen if it was carried out by people in high postions of power within the government.after all,it was the mayor of dallas-who hated kennedy,that changed his parade route.
please get the facts strait.I have NEVER backed Deano up on the alien shape shifting lizard thing.But just because I think he doesnt know what he is talking about on that issue,doesnt mean he hasnt done great research into 9/11.I back him up on 9/11 because he HAS done very good research into that subject.
1: David Ray Griffith is a theologian...not a scientist...his work was based on someone else's....someone who never even visited the US during their "investigation"...someone who never conducted a single scientific test into any of the pieces of physical evidence at any of the sites of the 9/11 attacks
as for the firefighters testimonies that were posted by Katsu in this thread...if i recall...not a single one of them said the word "explosives"....many said "explosions" but explosions are ALOT different from explosives...and explosions would be expected in a building where high power generators etc are being used and are being caught up in fires
as for trying depserately to grasp at straws...2 words....you already know what they are
KMC Community Forums
Sep 13th, 2008 09:25 PM
The essential force of reality
I listed that canada wants the truth link too many times here,your going to have to go back and look in the past pages where I listed those sources. I get tired of repeating them just to have them go ignored cause you guys dont want to see it.all you got to do to see the truth besides reading Griffiths books is visit this site 
